IBJOpinion

HETRICK: It's time to put money behind our crime-prevention push

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Bruce Hetrick

Last week, my wife attended a conference at Yale University in New Haven, Conn. I tagged along for a change of scenery, some quiet workspace, and a chance to visit friends in my old Nutmeg State stomping ground.

At the opening-night dinner, the organizers welcomed participants, outlined coursework and introduced leaders.

Then they did something I’m not accustomed to at home in Indiana or in my travels around the country: Instead of the usual chamber-of-commerce “enjoy our city” routine, they issued a safety warning.

They said Yale’s campus is safe enough, but we needed to be cautious—especially at night—in surrounding areas of New Haven, including the adjacent-to-campus downtown where our hotel was located.

They urged participants to take the shuttle bus to daytime conference sessions at the nearby Yale School of Management or, if they chose to walk, to do so in groups.

The next night, Cheri and I were headed out around 6 p.m. for dinner at a highly recommended pizzeria. Because it was only six blocks away, we thought we’d walk.

In the hotel lobby, however, a conference organizer and Yale alumnus hailed our dining choice but urged us to drive, because we’d likely be returning around sunset.

“It’s better to be careful,” he said.

So we drove.

New Haven should have everything going for it. It’s home to one of the most respected universities in the world. Town meets gown in a downtown with parks, historic neighborhoods, magnificent churches and a nice mix of residential, retail and office space. Highway access to New York, Boston, Cape Cod and points between is excellent.

And yet, in 2010, FBI data showed New Haven to be the fourth most dangerous city in the United States (behind, Flint, Mich.; Detroit, Mich.; and St. Louis, Mo.), based on the ratio of violent crime to population.

There was no promotional material about the city of New Haven in our hotel or in the conference packet—not a single brochure, magazine, restaurant list, shopping guide, historic walking tour map, nothing.

All we learned about New Haven is that it’s not safe.

That’s quite the contrast from Indianapolis, where we welcome visitors with open arms, urge them to walk everywhere, promote our 24/7 downtown, and pile on publications, videos, websites, apps and publicity filled with things to see and do.

But with a 2013 shoot-’em-up trend worthy of the O.K. Corral, we need to ask ourselves: Is Indianapolis at risk of suffering New Haven’s plight, and what are we doing to prevent such a blow to our reality and reputation?

Back in 2006, faced with an escalation in violent crime, Mayor Bart Peterson appointed a 45-member crime prevention task force to analyze the problem and determine how to help. I was honored to be one of them, sitting next to then-U.S. Attorney/now congresswoman Susan Brooks at meetings and co-chairing a best-practices subcommittee with then-Butler University President Bobby Fong.

Mayor Peterson asked us to look not just at how to enhance public safety’s ability to address present-day crime, but also how to address recidivism, education, economics, housing, drugs, poverty and other factors that contribute to crime.

He asked us to look not only at what had been done well locally that could be expanded or enhanced, but also at what had worked well in other places that could be introduced in Indianapolis.

When our task force returned with an ambitious set of recommendations—for new police officers; adequately funded public-safety pensions; strategic investments in our courts, judges and prosecutors; community-based grants for crime prevention programs and more—the mayor and city-county councilors contributed to their own political suicides (for many of them, anyway) by passing a local-option income tax to help fund these public-safety measures.

This week, sitting on a Yale island in a crime-ridden sea, I got to wondering what happened to the $90 million that was going to be focused on crime prevention. I asked think tanks, advocacy groups and academics. I searched the Web. I looked for outcome measures—the kinds of things you’d want to announce or report to citizens who’d been asked to cough up cash to ensure a safer city.

But other than a community crime prevention grant program that’s been booted from city government to the Indy Parks Foundation to the Central Indiana Community Foundation; a program that’s dwindled from the intended $4.5 million per year to just $1.7 million; a program that’s employed “peanut-butter philanthropy,” spreading too many small grants to too many recipients to make a measurable impact, there’s not much information to be found.

Just another task force report. Sitting on another shelf. Bullets flying ’round.

Now, as the murder rate in Indianapolis escalates, instead of using the tens of millions of local option income tax dollars allegedly allocated to crime prevention, city government is starting the Indy Public Safety Foundation to raise private donations for crime prevention.

I hope it’s not shelved. I hope it’s not shelled out piecemeal. And I hope it buys us more than what New Haven has.•

__________

Hetrick is an Indianapolis-based writer, speaker and public relations consultant. His column appears twice a month. He can be reached at bhetrick@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT