IBJNews

HHGregg gets 'Help' from Beatles to sell big screens

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

HHGregg Inc. is turning to John, Paul, George and Ringo to help it sell TVs, dishwashers and dryers.

The Indianapolis-based retailer launched its first national advertising campaign last month using the tagline “We Help” and the Beatles song “Help!” as its soundtrack. The Fab Four’s tune is designed to drive home HHGregg’s marketing claim that its career salespeople are more knowledgeable and helpful than the lower-paid staffs at such competitors as Best Buy.

HHGregg isn’t saying what it’s spending on the specific campaign, but it spent $87 million in its most recent fiscal year to hawk its electronics and appliances.

HHGregg spokeswoman Sari Martin also declined to disclose how much the company spent to license rights to “Help!” from Sony/ATV Music Publishing.
Andy Reismeyer, director of music licensing for Indianapolis-based CMG Worldwide, estimated HHGregg would have paid $500,000 to $1 million for the rights to use “Help!” as the centerpiece of its campaign.

And it could have paid several times more if it had elected to use the actual Beatles recording of the 1965 tune. Instead, HHGregg’s advertising agency, Florida-based Zimmer Advertising, a division of Omnicom, hired a music production company to make the recording used in the commercials.

“It’s a pretty big deal,” said Reismeyer, who works out of CMG’s office in Los Angeles, brokering licensing deals for the songs of CMG’s clients. “I mean, who’s bigger than the Beatles?”

He said an iconic song like “Help!” can grab consumers’ attention—which is especially important for a retailer selling fairly emotionless products like appliances.

“That’s just so valuable, especially when you’re selling dishwashers or dryers,” Reismeyer said. “It’s not like you’re selling a car and you can rely on the sex appeal of the car. Or a fragrance.”

Help! was the first Beatles song licensed for use in an advertisement. In 1985, Ford Motor Co. paid a reported $100,000 for the rights to make a new recording of it for a Lincoln-Mercury campaign.

Two years later, Nike Corp. paid $500,000 to use the original Beatles recording of “Revolution” in an ad campaign. The Nike ads led then-remaining group members Paul McCartney, George Harrison and Ringo Starr to file a lawsuit, which ended in a settlement.

The original Beatles members still receive royalties on all songs they wrote. But the publishing rights to the songs, which typically claim about 50 percent of all royalties, were placed into a corporate entity, and the Beatles members eventually lost control of those rights.

The publishing rights to the Beatles’ songs were purchased by the late Michael Jackson in 1985 as part of a 4,000-song catalog. He later sold a 50-percent interest in the catalog to Japan-based Sony.

At the time of Jackson’s death in 2009, his half of the Sony/ATV catalog that includes the Beatles tunes was valued at $1 billion, according to Bloomberg News.

“I don’t think Sony/ATV has any trouble licensing these songs, although they don’t do it very often,” Reismeyer said.

HHGregg’s current ads will run until the end of the year, according to Martin, on television, in print, online, on social media, and through direct mail and e-mail. They are running in all 15 states where HHGregg’s 173 stores are located. Also, the ads will appear in Pittsburgh, Miami and Chicago, new markets HHGregg will enter later this year.

The company’s sales last year rose 35 percent, to more than $2 billion, thanks to rapid expansion. Profit rose 22 percent, to $48.2 million.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • You killed a classic
    Hate it
  • Never
    That is when I will shop at hhgregg as long as they use "Help," especially that truly insipid TV version. Gahhhhh!!!!
  • boooo
    I agree, it's totally offensive. I'll never shop there again, and I will spread my dissent!
  • I turn off the TV
    I turn off the TV whenever an hh gregg commercial plays. The poor rendition of "Help!" makes me grind my teeth. Whoever is singing it should have their vocal cords forcibly removed.
  • use of the Help! song
    Well, I'm sure they got permission to use the song. I understand you're disappointed because it's not a super-60's Beatles version. It's still pleasing to hear though. It sure beats using a rap song, where they just scream like an animal with no tune to it. It must have cost a fortune to use the song. I was watching a DVD with commentary on the movie Strangeland, and they wanted to use the obscure Beatles song Piggies, and it would have cost over $100,000 to use it. I shudder to think how much a well-known Beatles song like Help! cost.
    • HH Gregg
      I was absolutely appalled when I heard the song "Help" on an HH Gregg commercial. Truly, how dare them think that they are worthy enough to play cherished Beatles music to hawk appliances.

      And if that were not awful enough, they had a lounge-type band perform the song.

      Shame on HH Gregg. I will never shop there again--there are just some things that shouldn't be diluted.
    • Shame on HHGregg
      Shame on HHGregg – the licensing of the Beatles “Help!” and the subsequent cutesy, insipid jingle is offensive on multiple levels – and shame on Zimmerman/Omnicom for their stunning lack of creative vision.

      Never shopped there and never will
    • Emails Blocked!
      Yeah, it's true. A single middle-management type blocked my queries to their employees. Today, she suggested I contact the ad firm, Zimmerman in Ft Lauderdale, FLA.
      Since they don't have a "Contact Us" prompt, depending on what happens, I'll contact Jordan Zimmerman of Zimmer Advertising and we'll go from there.
      Funny, how most decisions made by middle-management are damaging to their own companies.
    • I fired off emails to them
      On their web page, they have a Commercial/Ad prompt. I hit it to find about 15 email addresses, so I wrote an email to each, telling them I would no longer shop there until they stopped using the song. It shows an Incredible Lack of Taste and Common Sense. This morning, I received a reply from one, with the message: "Is this a serious email?" I answered: "You betcher ass."
    • approval
      Who said it was approved by them? Stay tuned for the lawsuit.
    • approval
      That's interesting and perhaps even a little surprising. In our experience, Yoko, particularly, and Sir Paul have executional approval on commercial sync use of most of the back catalogue, and it's approved on both a musical execution and a "by-industry" basis for a national ad buy. Interesting to hear what the appliance store did to get them to approve.
      • Anything for a Buck
        Maybe a better song selection would be "Baby your a Rich Man"
      • HH Gregg
        Thank you HH Gregg and Sony for taking a song that had so much introspective depth and meaning and reducing it to a jingle for the sole purpose of selling dishwashers.
      • Booo!
        So very wrong. I blame Michael Jackson for this travesty!

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. liek the rest of America

      2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

      3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

      4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

      5. whoa!

      ADVERTISEMENT