IBJNews

HHGregg shares sink on disappointing earnings

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Appliance and electronics retailer HHGregg Inc. said Tuesday that it expects its fiscal third-quarter earnings to decline, hurt by lower-than-expected profit margins in the video-product category and higher spending ad .

Its shares fell more than 15 percent in Tuesday trading.

The Indianapolis-based company expects earnings of $22.5 million, or 60 cents per share, for the three months that ended on Dec. 31. That's down from $26.9 million, or 66 cents per share, in the same period a year ago.

HHGregg expects revenue of $829.5 million, up 27 percent from $653.7 million.

Analysts, on average, were expecting earnings of 77 cents per share on revenue of $811.8 million, according to a poll by FactSet.

Dennis May, HHGregg president and CEO, attributed the disappointing earnings partly to falling prices and tighter profit margins for flat-screen televisions.

“The video industry experienced heavier than expected promotional activity across all screen sizes, which negatively impacted industry average selling prices and margins,” May said.

HHGregg estimated that its sales at stores open at least a year grew 3.9 percent in the third quarter. This is a key measure of a retailer's health because it excludes stores that opened or closed during the year.

For the full year, the company now expects earnings of $1.05 to $1.15 per share, down from its earlier outlook of $1.26 to $1.41 per share.

It expects revenue to grow by 22 to 24 percent, compared with its previous guidance of a 20 percent to 25 percent increase.

Analysts are expecting earnings of $1.34 per share on revenue of $2.5 billion for the year ending in March.

HHGregg plans to officially report its full quarterly financial results on Feb. 8.

The company's stock was down $2.05, or 15.6 percent, to $11.08 per share just before closing on Tuesday.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. From the story: "The city of Indianapolis also will consider tax incentives and funding for infrastructure required for the project, according to IEDC." Why would the City need to consider additional tax incentives when Lowe's has already bought the land and reached an agreement with IEDC to bring the jobs? What that tells me is that the City has already pledged the incentives, unofficially, and they just haven't had time to push it through the MDC yet. Either way, subsidizing $10/hour jobs is going to do nothing toward furthering the Mayor's stated goal of attracting middle and upper-middle class residents to Marion County.

  2. Ron Spencer and the entire staff of Theater on the Square embraced IndyFringe when it came to Mass Ave in 2005. TOTS was not only a venue but Ron and his friends created, presented and appeared in shows which embraced the 'spirit of the fringe'. He's weathered all the storms and kept smiling ... bon voyage and thank you.

  3. Not sure how many sushi restaurants are enough, but there are three that I know of in various parts of downtown proper and all are pretty good.

  4. First off, it's "moron," not "moran." 2nd, YOU don't get to vote on someone else's rights and freedoms that are guaranteed by the US Constitution. That's why this is not a state's rights issue...putting something like this to vote by, well, people like you who are quite clearly intellectually challenged isn't necessary since the 14th amendment has already decided the issue. Which is why Indiana's effort is a wasted one and a waste of money...and will be overturned just like this has in every other state.

  5. Rick, how does granting theright to marry to people choosing to marry same-sex partners harm the lives of those who choose not to? I cannot for the life of me see any harm to people who choose not to marry someone of the same sex. We understand your choice to take the parts of the bible literally in your life. That is fine but why force your religious beliefs on others? I'm hoping the judges do the right thing and declare the ban unconstitutional so all citizens of Wisconsin and Indiana have the same marriage rights and that those who chose someone of the same sex do not have less rights than others.

ADVERTISEMENT