IBJNews

Hoosiers like parts of health reform law

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

As it is in the rest of the country, the 2010 health reform in Indiana continues to be unpopular, unlikely to be repealed and uncertain to put a dent in health spending, according to a poll of Hoosiers released last week by Ball State University.

The Muncie-based university’s annual poll found 51 percent of Hoosiers view the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act unfavorably, while 35 percent view it favorably and 13 percent don’t know how they feel about it.

National surveys by organizations such as the Kaiser Family Foundation, CBS News and Rasmussen Reports have found similar results.

Still, key elements of the law remain overwhelmingly popular, making any repeal effort (which many Congressional Republicans have promised) difficult. Among Hoosiers, 93 percent said it is important to prevent health insurance companies from denying coverage based on preexisting conditions, something the 2010 legislation outlawed. Also, 84 percent of Hoosiers said “ensuring coverage for everyone” is important.

Nearly identical percentages of Hoosiers said those provisions were important in the same survey a year ago.

The most popular idea about health reform is “making coverage affordable,” and 96 percent of Hoosiers say that is important. But whether the 2010 health overhaul will make good on that promise is uncertain.

The law will raise various taxes in order to expand health insurance coverage to an additional 32 million Americans.

One of the main arguments for doing so was that uninsured Americans are forced to seek care at hospital emergency rooms, which is the most expensive place to do so. Often, these patients cannot pay their ER bills, so hospitals shift those costs onto those who can pay—patients with insurance.

If more Americans had health insurance, the argument went, ER usage and overall health care spending would decline.

But Ball State’s survey found that Hoosiers with health insurance go to the emergency room as often—and perhaps a bit more often—than those without coverage. Thirty-one percent of insured Hoosiers used the ER in the past 12 months, Ball State found, compared with 29 percent of uninsured Hoosiers.

Advocates of the health law say wider insurance coverage will lead more patients to see a physician, hopefully catching expensive medical conditions before they require hospitalization.

On that front, the expansion of insurance coverage may help. Ball State found that only 56 percent of uninsured Hoosiers had seen a physician in the previous year, compared with 87 percent of insured Hoosiers.

Ball State's survey was conducted by phone between Nov. 14 and 17. Its results, based on the answers of 607 respondents, have a margin of error of 4.4 percent.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. With Pence running the ship good luck with a new government building on the site. He does everything on the cheap except unnecessary roads line a new beltway( like we need that). Things like state of the art office buildings and light rail will never be seen as an asset to these types. They don't get that these are the things that help a city prosper.

  2. Does the $100,000,000,000 include salaries for members of Congress?

  3. "But that doesn't change how the piece plays to most of the people who will see it." If it stands out so little during the day as you seem to suggest maybe most of the people who actually see it will be those present when it is dark enough to experience its full effects.

  4. That's the mentality of most retail marketers. In this case Leo was asked to build the brand. HHG then had a bad sales quarter and rather than stay the course, now want to go back to the schlock that Zimmerman provides (at a considerable cut in price.) And while HHG salesmen are, by far, the pushiest salesmen I have ever experienced, I believe they are NOT paid on commission. But that doesn't mean they aren't trained to be aggressive.

  5. The reason HHG's sales team hits you from the moment you walk through the door is the same reason car salesmen do the same thing: Commission. HHG's folks are paid by commission they and need to hit sales targets or get cut, while BB does not. The sales figures are aggressive, so turnover rate is high. Electronics are the largest commission earners along with non-needed warranties, service plans etc, known in the industry as 'cheese'. The wholesale base price is listed on the cryptic price tag in the string of numbers near the bar code. Know how to decipher it and you get things at cost, with little to no commission to the sales persons. Whether or not this is fair, is more of a moral question than a financial one.

ADVERTISEMENT