IBJNews

IEDC promotes exec to lead business development

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Kent Anderson, a military veteran who has overseen international business development for the Indiana Economic Development Corp. since January 2012, has been promoted to the influential position of vice president of business development, the IEDC said Friday.

In the role, Anderson  will work directly with chief executives in Indiana and around the world to help them expand their businesses or move them to the Hoosier State. In many cases, he will serve as the first point of contact for those CEOs.

Anderson immediately replaces Charlie Sparks, who had been with the IEDC in various positions since its founding in 2005. Sparks left to "pursue new endeavors," the IEDC said.

Anderson is a 1990 graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy and holds a master's of international business studies from the University of South Carolina’s Moore School of Business. He served tours of duty with the Indiana National Guard in Iraq and the U.S. Navy during the Gulf War.

In private sector life, Anderson planned and implemented logistics processes for German luxury carmaker Audi AG in Germany and served with Switzerland-based George Utz, Inc. as its first general manager of North American operations.

Most recently, Anderson led the Columbus Area Metropolitan Planning Organization.   

The IEDC secured deals with more than 110 international companies with Anderson leading international business development,

ADVERTISEMENT

  • great news
    I am glad to see the IEDC doing this, with his international experience, we can hope for a bright future in bringing foreign companies to Indiana.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

  2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

  3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

  4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

  5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.

ADVERTISEMENT