IBJNews

Museum of Art expects boost from fall Warhol show

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indianapolis Museum of Art expects an Andy Warhol exhibit this fall will draw 40,000 people, helping it offset a predicted $2 million drop in revenue from its endowment in the next fiscal year.

The Warhol show opens Oct. 10 and runs through Jan. 2. It will feature more than 100 works in a wide range of media and cover his career from the 1950s to the 1980s. Much of the work will be on loan from the Andy Warhol Museum in Pittsburgh. The PNC Foundation, the corporate foundation of Pittsburgh-based PNC Financial Services, is a major sponsor.

IMA CEO Max Anderson has said a successful fall exhibit would be one way to help the museum balance its budget in fiscal year 2011, which begins July 1.

Museum spokeswoman Katie Zarich said the museum staff hasn't completed its revenue projections for "Andy Warhol Enterprises." The general admission price will be $14, but IMA members will be admitted free. The museum has about 9,300 members.

The IMA's last fall exhibit, Sacred Spain, featured free admission and drew 69,218 people. The last exhibit that charged admission, Power and Glory in 2008, drew 29,696. Attendance for the Warhol exhibit is predicted to exceed that exhibit by 25 percent.

The endowment is decreasing its payout to IMA due to investment losses in 2008 that forced the museum to reduce its annual "draw rate."

IMA expects to get about $16.4 million from the endowment in the 2011 fiscal year, accounting for 69 percent of the museum's total revenue.

The endowment was valued at $324.3 million on March 31.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

  2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

  3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  4. If you only knew....

  5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

ADVERTISEMENT