IBJNews

Indiana agency sued over cuts to program for disabled

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A federal lawsuit says Indiana's social services agency has made changes to Medicaid waiver programs that threaten to deprive thousands of developmentally disabled people of income they need to survive outside of institutions.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana filed the lawsuit against the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration on behalf of 27-year-old Karla Steimel in U.S. District Court in Indianapolis. The ACLU is asking for class-action status.

Steimel, who has cerebral palsy and requires assistance with daily tasks such as bathing and eating, works at an office but depends on state assistance to live outside of an institution, the lawsuit says. FSSA recently changed the criteria for one program to require applicants to need skilled nursing care such as ventilation or help taking medication. Steimel had been on the waiting list for another program for 15 years when the FSSA eliminated the waiting list and said only certain "priority" applicants would be accepted, court documents say.

"The bottom line is the state operates two significant waiver programs. And for various reasons, she's been told she can't reenroll in either one," ACLU attorney Gavin Rose said.

The state has offered Steimel, who lives in southwest Indiana's Knox County, the option of signing up for a third program, but without the others her income would be greatly reduced, the lawsuit filed Friday contends.

FSSA spokeswoman Marni Lemons said Monday that the agency hadn't received a copy of the lawsuit and couldn't comment.

For the first time in her life, the lawsuit says, Steimel faces the prospect of being forced into an institution.

The ACLU suit contends that the FSSA's new policies violate the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and asks a judge to order the agency to reinstate former requirements.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Deception
    As usual fraud and deception is all that can be expected with this state run agency. I only wish the federal government knew the truth about this state run agency It would be great if it did go class action, there would be thousands and this is why the judge would prob deny it. Hope she wins her case:))
  • Missing the point as usual
    Shouldn't the goal here be that this woman be able to live independently?? As usual, the state will let the lazy freeload off the system, but someone makes an effort and no help is available. Makes no sense. FSSA is run by a bunch of bureaucrats with no common sense and no compassion.
  • 47%
    Damn TAKERS!!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?

ADVERTISEMENT