IBJNews

Indiana backs off defense of new immigration law

Associated Press
July 31, 2012
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The state attorney general's office said Tuesday that it no longer will defend most of the disputed portions of Indiana's new immigration law, as they were rendered invalid when the U.S. Supreme Court struck down similar parts of an Arizona law in June.

The state said in documents filed in in federal court in Indianapolis that it would recommend that Judge Sarah Evans Barker strike down most of the portions of the Indiana law that enable police to make warrantless arrests based on certain immigration documents, including common documents known as notices of action.

"The Attorney General will submit the issue to the Court with the recommendation that a warrantless arrest under those circumstances is unconstitutional. Warrantless arrests under those circumstances and justifications will not be defended and a ruling by this Court to that effect will be accepted," the court documents said.

The state said it would seek to keep the power to arrest immigrants for whom a 48-hour detention order has been issued.

Federal immigration officials said that applies only to people who already are in custody.

"A detainer notifies that law enforcement entity that we would like to take custody of that person when they are released from local custody," said Gail Montenegro, a spokeswoman for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Ken Falk, legal director for the American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana, which challenged the Indiana law along with the National Immigration Law Center, said the state's decision meant police would not able to arrest immigrants on the street or during traffic stops unless they had a warrant.

Linton Joaquin, general counsel for the law center, said Indiana's decision to back down was a "positive development."

"The attorney general's decision to drop the defense of parts of the law should serve as a warning to other state legislatures that may consider enacting similar state immigration laws in the future," he said.

The state also asked the judge to clarify the limits of its power to regulate immigrants' use of consular identification cards, which were not covered in the Supreme Court ruling. The Indiana law would have made it illegal for immigrants to use ID cards issued by foreign consulates as proof of identification.

The attorney general's office said it would recommend that Indiana should have the right to define what identification is acceptable for government purposes.

"We've never disputed that," Falk said.

The state said it would leave it up to the judge to determine if the law applied in other situations, such as acceptance of consular ID by private entities such as businesses.

Barker last year threw out both portions of the extensive law that was passed by the 2011 Legislature.

The attorney general's office said it would continue to contest a separate challenge to different sections of the law filed in federal court in northern Indiana. That case challenges a provision allowing the state to sue employers who employ illegal workers to recoup unemployment benefits and a requirement that those seeking day-labor jobs complete proof of employment forms.

Attorney General Greg Zoeller said the Supreme Court ruling on Arizona's law made it clear that enforcing immigration laws was up to the federal government, not states. But, he said, states were frustrated by lack of enforcement.

"Whatever its flaws, this Indiana legislation was not an 'anti-immigrant' bill, it was an anti-illegal-immigration bill," Zoeller said in a statement.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • white geNOcide
    Every White country, community, and institution on the planet is forced to become multicultural and multiracial. No one asks that of ANY non-White country, community, and institution. Immigration and assimilation is forced upon EVERY White country, community, and institution and ONLY White countries, communities, and institutions. Anti-whites call themselves “anti-racists”, but their actions lead to the elimination of one race and only one race, my race, the White race. The true purpose of illegal immigration, forced diversity, and "anti-racism" is to wipe out my race. It's genocide. Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The deductible is entirely paid by the POWER account. No one ever has to contribute more than $25/month into the POWER account and it is often less. The only cost not paid out of the POWER account is the ER copay ($8-25) for non-emergent use of the ER. And under HIP 2.0, if a member calls the toll-free, 24 hour nurse line, and the nurse tells them to go to the ER, the copay is waived. It's also waived if the member is admitted to the hospital. Honestly, although it is certainly not "free" - I think Indiana has created a decent plan for the currently uninsured. Also consider that if a member obtains preventive care, she can lower her monthly contribution for the next year. Non-profits may pay up to 75% of the contribution on behalf of the member, and the member's employer may pay up to 50% of the contribution.

  2. I wonder if the governor could multi-task and talk to CMS about helping Indiana get our state based exchange going so Hoosiers don't lose subsidy if the court decision holds. One option I've seen is for states to contract with healthcare.gov. Or maybe Indiana isn't really interested in healthcare insurance coverage for Hoosiers.

  3. So, how much did either of YOU contribute? HGH Thank you Mr. Ozdemir for your investments in this city and your contribution to the arts.

  4. So heres brilliant planning for you...build a $30 M sports complex with tax dollars, yet send all the hotel tax revenue to Carmel and Fishers. Westfield will unlikely never see a payback but the hotel "centers" of Carmel and Fishers will get rich. Lousy strategy Andy Cook!

  5. AlanB, this is how it works...A corporate welfare queen makes a tiny contribution to the arts and gets tons of positive media from outlets like the IBJ. In turn, they are more easily to get their 10s of millions of dollars of corporate welfare (ironically from the same people who are against welfare for humans).

ADVERTISEMENT