IBJNews

Indiana bans DuPont’s Imprelis herbicide

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana has banned the sale, distribution and use of DuPont’s Imprelis herbicide after finding that it damaged scores of trees and ornamental plants.

The Office of Indiana State Chemist at Purdue University, which administers state law involving pesticides, said Monday that it is notifying lawn-care companies and other professional users that the herbicide’s registration in Indiana has been canceled.

In July, IBJ reported that Indianapolis-based golf course manager R.N. Thompson Golf LLC was leading a class-action lawsuit against DuPont because it suffered "catastrophic tree loss” after applying Imprelis.

Indiana’s actions follow a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency order in August requiring DuPont to stop selling and distributing Imprelis. The step Indiana took was necessary to prohibit other parties from selling and using it in the state, the office said.

The herbicide was intended to control a variety of broadleaf weeds such as ground ivy and wild violet on lawns, golf courses, parks, cemeteries, athletic field and sod farms.

But Imprelis became the target of complaints in Indiana in the spring from lawn care providers and customers who suspected it was damaging trees—mainly evergreens—and ornamental plants near where it was applied.

The state chemist’s office said it has investigated about 400 complaints since June.


 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • RN is top notch
    This speaks to the best of class management that RN Thompson incorporates on the courses that they manage. I am happy to have them manage our city courses.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Looking at the two companies - in spite of their relative size to one another -- Ricker's image is (by all accounts) pretty solid and reputable. Their locations are clean, employees are friendly and the products they offer are reasonably priced. By contrast, BP locations are all over the place and their reputation is poor, especially when you consider this is the same "company" whose disastrous oil spill and their response was nothing short of irresponsible should tell you a lot. The fact you also have people who are experienced in franchising saying their system/strategy is flawed is a good indication that another "spill" has occurred and it's the AM-PM/Ricker's customers/company that are having to deal with it.

  2. Daniel Lilly - Glad to hear about your points and miles. Enjoy Wisconsin and Illinois. You don't care one whit about financial discipline, which is why you will blast the "GOP". Classic liberalism.

  3. Isn't the real reason the terrain? The planners under-estimated the undulating terrain, sink holes, karst features, etc. This portion of the route was flawed from the beginning.

  4. You thought no Indy was bad, how's no fans working out for you? THe IRl No direct competition and still no fans. Hey George Family, spend another billion dollars, that will fix it.

  5. I live downtown Indy and had to be in downtown Chicago for a meeting. In other words, I am the target demographic for this train. It leaves at 6:00-- early but doable. Then I saw it takes 5+ hours. No way. I drove. I'm sure I paid 3 to 5 times as much once you factor in gas, parking, and tolls, but it was reimbursed so not a factor for me. Any business traveler is going to take the option that gets there quickly and reliably... and leisure travelers are going to take the option that has a good schedule and promotional prices (i.e., Megabus). Indy to Chicago is the right distance (too short to fly but takes several hours to drive) that this train could be extremely successful even without subsidies, if they could figure out how to have several frequencies (at least 3x/day) and make the trip in a reasonable amount of time. For those who have never lived on the east coast-- Amtrak is the #1 choice for NY-DC and NY-Boston. They have the Acela service, it runs almost every hour, and it takes you from downtown to downtown. It beats driving and flying hands down. It is too bad that we cannot build something like this in the midwest, at least to connect the bigger cities.

ADVERTISEMENT