Indiana business tax changes still worry some mayors

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Some local-government officials around the state remain worried about changes Indiana lawmakers are considering to the state's property tax on business equipment.

That tax now brings in about $1 billion a year for local governments and schools. Legislators have scaled back Republican Gov. Mike Pence's proposal to eliminate the tax, countering with plans to exempt small businesses or give counties an option to waive the tax on new investments.

Terre Haute Mayor Duke Bennett, a Republican, said even those proposals concerned him because they could leave local governments with less money. Many are still struggling five years after the enactment of statewide property-tax caps.

"I've not heard anything about replacement revenue," Bennett told the Tribune-Star.

The state Senate's tax committee this week approved a package of business tax cuts that includes eliminating the equipment tax for small businesses. Republicans in the House, meanwhile, are working on a proposal that would let counties eliminate the tax on new equipment purchases.

Supporters of eliminating the tax say such a move would spur business investment in the state, creating more tax revenue overall.

Bill Waltz, a vice president the Indiana Chamber of Commerce, said the group doesn't believe all the tax revenue lost from scaling back the equipment tax needed to be replaced.

"This tax is actually more detrimental than others," he said.

Evansville Mayor Lloyd Winnecke, a Republican, is among the city leaders who've testified before legislative committees against eliminating the tax.

Winnecke said the city governments need the money to provide services and amenities in order to attract business investment, the Evansville Courier & Press reported.

"Communities who invest in their selves and residents are the ones who will ultimately thrive," Winnecke said.

Some counties with numerous factories have high levels of property tax revenue coming from the equipment tax, such as more than 40 percent in southwestern Indiana's Gibson County and about 35 percent in central Indiana's Howard County. Largely rural Brown County in southern Indiana, however, has a level of about 3 percent.

The Indiana Association of Cities and Towns will oppose both the House and Senate proposals as long as replacement revenues aren't included, said Matt Greller, the group's executive director

The association is not opposed to reducing the equipment tax, but "on the flip side, we've got to keep local government whole," he said.


  • Tax Tax Tax
    I don't see the problem. Get rid of business taxes and TAX THE LITTLE GUY. It's the Hoosier way.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Can your dog sign a marriage license or personally state that he wishes to join you in a legal union? If not then no, you cannot marry him. When you teach him to read, write, and speak a discernible language, then maybe you'll have a reasonable argument. Thanks for playing!

  2. Look no further than Mike Rowe, the former host of dirty jobs, who was also a classically trained singer.

  3. Current law states income taxes are paid to the county of residence not county of income source. The most likely scenario would be some alteration of the income tax distribution formula so money earned in Marion co. would go to Marion Co by residents of other counties would partially be distributed to Marion co. as opposed to now where the entirety is held by the resident's county.

  4. This is more same-old, same-old from a new generation of non-progressive 'progressives and fear mongers. One only needs to look at the economic havoc being experienced in California to understand the effect of drought on economies and people's lives. The same mindset in California turned a blind eye to the growth of population and water needs in California, defeating proposal after proposal to build reservoirs, improve water storage and delivery infrastructure...and the price now being paid for putting the demands of a raucous minority ahead of the needs of many. Some people never, never learn..

  5. I wonder if I can marry him too? Considering we are both males, wouldn't that be a same sex marriage as well? If they don't honor it, I'll scream discrimination just like all these people have....