IBJNews

Indiana consumer group backing planned wind farm

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A consumer advocacy group that backs a proposed central Indiana wind farm has accused the project's opponents of spreading misinformation about the electricity-generating turbines in an attempt to keep it from being built.

The Indianapolis-based Citizens Action Coalition sent a letter to the Tipton County Plan Commission last week calling the opponents' arguments off-the-wall and unsubstantiated, the Kokomo Tribune reported.

One wind farm developer last year finished building 125 turbines in Tipton County and neighboring Madison County, while some residents of Tipton and Howard counties are fighting plans by another company to put up nearly 100 more turbines.

Jeff Hoover of Tipton County Citizens for Responsible Development, a group that opposes the project, said it's time for county officials to realize how many people don't want industrial wind farms in the area about 40 miles north of Indianapolis.

"We have provided scientific and empirical data," Hoover said. "That data shows property value loss and health and safety concerns. Every group has the right to their own opinion."

Colorado-based juwi Wind is seeking approval to build about 90 turbines for the Prairie Breeze Wind Farm in a rural area northwest of Tipton. Its request includes a reduction in the county's required 1,500-foot distance between the wind farm's turbines and neighboring homes to 1,400 feet from homes on properties not involved with the project and 1,250 feet from homes on participating properties.

Construction finished late last year on 125 turbines in eastern Tipton County and northern Madison County for the Wildcat Wind Farm developed by E.ON Climate and Renewables of Chicago. Nearly 200 more turbines are planned in neighboring Howard and Grant counties in later phases.

Kerwin Olson, executive director of the Citizens Action Coalition, disputed claims that property values decrease around a wind farm and said data indicates that wind power is less expensive than electricity from a new coal-fired plant.

Olson said it isn't clear who is paying for the research cited by wind farm opponents.

"We don't doubt that there are concerns," he said. "But the claims should be backed up by scientific research and empirical data. We would question the motives of those opposed to wind energy."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Man, that sounded arrogant.
    I feel for the property owners in Tipton County who have a gentleman living in Indianapolis questioning their motives for opposing wind power. If Mr. Olson wants to criticize them, he should first move to the middle of a wind farm for a year and then report back -- with a straight face -- that the turbines in no way affected his quality of life.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT