IBJNews

Indiana Democrats to seek Medicaid expansion

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Democratic leaders in the Indiana General Assembly are seeking expanded Medicaid coverage with the argument that it will lower health care costs statewide.

House Minority Leader Scott Pelath and Senate Minority Leader Tim Lanane said Friday that Indiana risks becoming an "island of the uninsured" as other Republican-led states approve the federal expansion.

Gov. Mike Pence, a Republican, announced this week he will oppose an expansion unless the state's health savings accounts plan is approved as an alternative.

Opponents of the Medicaid expansion have said it would cost the state too much money. An actuary hired by former Gov. Mitch Daniels determined the expansion would cost $95 million next year and jump to $525 million by 2020.

Democrats say that analysis ignores cost savings as residents stop relying on emergency-room care.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • not a new cost
    The "cost" to the State is not a new cost. Uninsured Hoosiers are getting care today at hospitals and providers and not paying for it, so the cost is passed to insureds and employers. Or they are NOT getting care early, and eventually racking up a expensive health care bill. What is the cost of those people declaring medical bankruptcy? If Indiana does not expand Medicaid, what is the alternative for our fellow citizens? Continue to use the ER after the problem becomes cost prohibited. If every person against expansion would examine their own personal life and how much better they are because they have insurance, this would not be an issue. Why are you against this? Because you have a job that offers insurance? Ha, what happens when that goes away? If ever the phrase "But there for the grace of God, go I" applies in a situation, it is this one. Except for giving the Dems a "victory" tell me one good reason why not? It's too costly to pass up! Not too costly to do.
  • Wow- big numbers
    There are all these "scare tactics" that the Republicans use to fend off the expense of making health care available to a larger group of citizens. It's sad that these cheap shots get publicity and the facts what are the costs/ what are the benefits get lost in all the carping and moaning about spending tax dollars that might benefit the middle class. The Fed is paying for the expansion of Medicare-- but Hoosier Repubs won't allow that cause they might have to give some credit to the Democrats who passed a health care bill that many from both parties have tried to do for decades. It would be commendable if some facts (not just the skewed, partisan ones) would be put before the public to see what is the best course-- and stop the scare tactics. It sounds like this new Governor reports to Wellpoint, not the citizens of Indiana.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT