IBJNews

Indiana environmental activists to push bipartisan agenda

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Environmentalists say the new era of Republican control of both chambers of the Legislature won't change their efforts to seek broad bipartisan support for initiatives they contend can also boost the state's economy.

The GOP reclaimed the Indiana House on Nov. 2 after four years of Democratic control, giving Republicans control of the House, Senate and governor's office. Lawmakers meet Tuesday for their annual organization day to begin planning their agendas.

Jesse Kharbanda, executive director of the Hoosier Environmental Council, said the new Legislature will make it more challenging to sell environmental initiatives mainly because there are more than two dozen freshmen lawmakers he and others will have to court.

He said environmental advocacy groups will be spending the next few weeks meeting with those new lawmakers and filling them in on environmental issues they support.

Kharbanda said that because Republicans have long controlled the state Senate, the Indianapolis-based not-for-profit council has always tried to champion issues likely to garner wide bipartisan support.

"We've always been sensitive to the ideological dominance in the Senate. We've never wanted to propose legislation we didn't think would eventually gain currency with the Senate Republicans," Kharbanda said.

Rep. Jeff Espich, the House Republican budget expert who sits on the State Budget Committee, said lawmakers' primary concerns in the coming session will be writing a new two-year state budget, working to stimulate job growth and funding education within the state's financial constraints.

Environmental legislation will simply take a back seat to those more pressing matters, said Espich, R-Uniondale. "Those issues are not likely to be on the same level," he said.

Kharbanda said he and other activists will closely follow expected state budget cuts they fear could weaken enforcement of the state's environmental programs even as they push favored initiatives such as a state renewable energy standard.

Such a standard would commit the state to drawing a set percentage of its electricity from renewable sources such as wind or solar by a specific timeframe — and supporters say it would also spur jobs in Indiana's renewable energy industry.

Another priority will be funding mechanisms for mass transit systems such as buses and commuter trains, Kharbanda said.

Rep. Ryan Dvorak, a South Bend Democrat who had chaired the House Environmental Committee, said he is worried that most of the issues important to environmental activists "are going to be dead" under Republican control of the Indiana House.

Dvorak expects the Legislature's environmental agenda to be dominated by initiatives that attract the most support among Republicans. But he said other measures such as efforts to reduce algae problems in the state's waterways may attract wider support.

"I've got a good relationship with people on both sides of the aisle and I think we're going to continue to work together — I just think it's going to be more difficult," he said.

Rep. Dick Dodge, a Pleasant Lake Republican who represents northeastern Indiana's lake-filled Steuben County, plans to sponsor a bill restricting the use of lawn fertilizers containing phosphorous that can fuel algae blooms in the state's lakes, rivers and streams.

Dodge said his legislation would allow those fertilizers to be used on new lawns where homeowners are trying establish their greens but ban their use on established lawns.

"My district contains a lot of lakes and the lake folks are pushing to have this done. They think it's bad for the water quality," he said.

Indiana is currently moving ahead on one issue long sought by activists, expanding rules allowing the owners of wind turbines and other renewable power systems to get credit for excess power they generate.

A rule proposed by the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission would allow all classes of utility customers to get such credit and raising the power capacity 100-fold to 1 megawatt. Currently only homeowners and K-12 schools benefit and there's a 10-kilowatt limit.

Steve Francis of the Hoosier Chapter of the Sierra Club said he and others hope to convince lawmakers to follow up on that regulatory change by adding Indiana to the list of about 20 states with bond financing or loan programs that help offset the formidable cost of installing renewable power systems.

"That's sort of the next step, helping people get over the hump of the very high cost of renewable technologies," he said. "That upfront cost is a big hurdle."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Bipartisian? That must be within the GOP
    The GOP ran on anything but bipartisian cooperation and working together. Now you wonder if there is going to be bipartisianship? Where have you been? The GOP made it clear that it will be their agenda or no agenda both nationally, state, and city. So if you get the GOP to agree within their ranks I guess you can spin it as bipartisian, but we all know that you lie as does the GOP
  • Bipartisan / ROI and Environmental Solutions
    Smart Growth via City, State, and Federal partnerships leveraging more Private Dollars creates the opportunity for Jobs in the community, where we need them, while paying back for the public reinvestment with 50 to 75 percent annual ROI. Imagine that Republicans create bipartisan ship, win wins, buy funding the 30% public dollars needed to have smart growth projects, which create Jobs, opportunities to have long term sustainability, large Return on public investment, and environmental solutions. All this not including the multiplier effects of savings, the other money not needed to be spent because problems are solved, the other compounding ROI from the current lost opportunities, or the jobs that create other jobs. This is what a government does when they are doing what is good for our country and people, when they want to create a platform to: have a 21st Century Economy that is easy to do business in, an environment of bipartisanship, win wins, saving the environment, while setting the financial foundation of our country. Smart Growth, rebuilding our corridors, in the center of the preferred quarter, is the most important fiscal, environmentally sound, responsible, sustainable thing for our City to do.


  • Environmental issues
    Really? What a shame that you can't just expect the new lawmakers to back environmental issues just because it's the right thing to do. So, lawmakers need to be "courted" to consider the environment? That's a pretty sad statement.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT