IBJNews

Indiana environmental activists to push bipartisan agenda

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Environmentalists say the new era of Republican control of both chambers of the Legislature won't change their efforts to seek broad bipartisan support for initiatives they contend can also boost the state's economy.

The GOP reclaimed the Indiana House on Nov. 2 after four years of Democratic control, giving Republicans control of the House, Senate and governor's office. Lawmakers meet Tuesday for their annual organization day to begin planning their agendas.

Jesse Kharbanda, executive director of the Hoosier Environmental Council, said the new Legislature will make it more challenging to sell environmental initiatives mainly because there are more than two dozen freshmen lawmakers he and others will have to court.

He said environmental advocacy groups will be spending the next few weeks meeting with those new lawmakers and filling them in on environmental issues they support.

Kharbanda said that because Republicans have long controlled the state Senate, the Indianapolis-based not-for-profit council has always tried to champion issues likely to garner wide bipartisan support.

"We've always been sensitive to the ideological dominance in the Senate. We've never wanted to propose legislation we didn't think would eventually gain currency with the Senate Republicans," Kharbanda said.

Rep. Jeff Espich, the House Republican budget expert who sits on the State Budget Committee, said lawmakers' primary concerns in the coming session will be writing a new two-year state budget, working to stimulate job growth and funding education within the state's financial constraints.

Environmental legislation will simply take a back seat to those more pressing matters, said Espich, R-Uniondale. "Those issues are not likely to be on the same level," he said.

Kharbanda said he and other activists will closely follow expected state budget cuts they fear could weaken enforcement of the state's environmental programs even as they push favored initiatives such as a state renewable energy standard.

Such a standard would commit the state to drawing a set percentage of its electricity from renewable sources such as wind or solar by a specific timeframe — and supporters say it would also spur jobs in Indiana's renewable energy industry.

Another priority will be funding mechanisms for mass transit systems such as buses and commuter trains, Kharbanda said.

Rep. Ryan Dvorak, a South Bend Democrat who had chaired the House Environmental Committee, said he is worried that most of the issues important to environmental activists "are going to be dead" under Republican control of the Indiana House.

Dvorak expects the Legislature's environmental agenda to be dominated by initiatives that attract the most support among Republicans. But he said other measures such as efforts to reduce algae problems in the state's waterways may attract wider support.

"I've got a good relationship with people on both sides of the aisle and I think we're going to continue to work together — I just think it's going to be more difficult," he said.

Rep. Dick Dodge, a Pleasant Lake Republican who represents northeastern Indiana's lake-filled Steuben County, plans to sponsor a bill restricting the use of lawn fertilizers containing phosphorous that can fuel algae blooms in the state's lakes, rivers and streams.

Dodge said his legislation would allow those fertilizers to be used on new lawns where homeowners are trying establish their greens but ban their use on established lawns.

"My district contains a lot of lakes and the lake folks are pushing to have this done. They think it's bad for the water quality," he said.

Indiana is currently moving ahead on one issue long sought by activists, expanding rules allowing the owners of wind turbines and other renewable power systems to get credit for excess power they generate.

A rule proposed by the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission would allow all classes of utility customers to get such credit and raising the power capacity 100-fold to 1 megawatt. Currently only homeowners and K-12 schools benefit and there's a 10-kilowatt limit.

Steve Francis of the Hoosier Chapter of the Sierra Club said he and others hope to convince lawmakers to follow up on that regulatory change by adding Indiana to the list of about 20 states with bond financing or loan programs that help offset the formidable cost of installing renewable power systems.

"That's sort of the next step, helping people get over the hump of the very high cost of renewable technologies," he said. "That upfront cost is a big hurdle."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Bipartisian? That must be within the GOP
    The GOP ran on anything but bipartisian cooperation and working together. Now you wonder if there is going to be bipartisianship? Where have you been? The GOP made it clear that it will be their agenda or no agenda both nationally, state, and city. So if you get the GOP to agree within their ranks I guess you can spin it as bipartisian, but we all know that you lie as does the GOP
  • Bipartisan / ROI and Environmental Solutions
    Smart Growth via City, State, and Federal partnerships leveraging more Private Dollars creates the opportunity for Jobs in the community, where we need them, while paying back for the public reinvestment with 50 to 75 percent annual ROI. Imagine that Republicans create bipartisan ship, win wins, buy funding the 30% public dollars needed to have smart growth projects, which create Jobs, opportunities to have long term sustainability, large Return on public investment, and environmental solutions. All this not including the multiplier effects of savings, the other money not needed to be spent because problems are solved, the other compounding ROI from the current lost opportunities, or the jobs that create other jobs. This is what a government does when they are doing what is good for our country and people, when they want to create a platform to: have a 21st Century Economy that is easy to do business in, an environment of bipartisanship, win wins, saving the environment, while setting the financial foundation of our country. Smart Growth, rebuilding our corridors, in the center of the preferred quarter, is the most important fiscal, environmentally sound, responsible, sustainable thing for our City to do.


  • Environmental issues
    Really? What a shame that you can't just expect the new lawmakers to back environmental issues just because it's the right thing to do. So, lawmakers need to be "courted" to consider the environment? That's a pretty sad statement.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT