IBJNews

Indiana farmers expected to enjoy near-record income

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Many Indiana farmers who had been worrying about a late summer drought are now looking forward to some extra spending money thanks to high grain prices, which a Purdue University farm analyst expects will boost the state's farm income about 25 percent this year.

Indiana's 2010 farm income should top $3 billion, about a half-billion dollars higher than last year and just below 2008's record of $3.2 billion, said Purdue agricultural economist Chris Hurt.

He said grain prices currently are "extraordinarily high" and being driven by strong global demand for American grains. Soybeans currently are priced at about $13 a bushel, with corn about $5.75 a bushel, Hurt said.

"The crop producers are excited. These are good times for crop incomes," he said.

U.S. Department of Agriculture crop production estimates released Tuesday show Indiana farmers are expected to harvest about 918.4 million bushels of corn and 266.5 million bushels of soybeans this year.

Indiana farmers are virtually done harvesting those crops following a drought that cut some yields but allowed producers to bring in crops at near-record prices this fall.

Hurt said the drought had a minimal impact on Indiana's crops because good weather allowed farmers to plant their fields early and then plentiful rain between May and July infused soils with moisture that sustained crops during the drought that followed.

Some farmers will spend part of the extra income they expect to get this year on big purchases such as farm equipment, reducing their debt or long-delayed projects, he said.

"When there's good income the barn gets painted that hasn't been painted in years. Or maybe they'll trade up their pickup truck," Hurt said.

But many farmers won't be able to fully capitalize on the current high grain prices because they sold part of their crop on advance contract at locked-in prices, said Mike Baise, strategic issue coordinator for Indiana Farm Bureau.

He said banks that loan farmers money to help plant crops in the spring typically encourage such contracts to increase the chances they'll be paid back.

"A lot of the farmers are using somebody else's money to put in the crop. It's placing a bet really, whether you want to gamble on the markets going up or down," Baise said.

Tom Gasper, who farms about 3,700 acres of corn and soybeans in south-central Indiana's Jennings County with two of his brothers, said they sold some of their crop on contract earlier this year before grain prices rose.

But they'll be able to sell the remainder at the current higher prices.

Gasper said the drought has cut his corn yields about 25 percent below average. He's expecting higher income this year, but said rising costs of fertilizer and of rented cropland will eat much of it up.

"Whatever extra money we get this year is going to go right back into the inflated fertilizer costs and the land costs for next year. The bulk of it will," he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, the Athenaeum is going to have to get past the hurdle with the Lockerbie residents and the agreement that the parcel would be residential. Second, and in my opinion, this prime piece of property should include parking, PLUS, a black box theater(s), some market rate and affordable artist housing and a plan to renovate and reconfigure the second story theater. I would negotiate to add the DeHaan property surface parking lot into the development mix, place a one story surface parking garage on the DeHaan lot on the street level (for the Dehaan tenants use during the daytime) and add a second story to the garage that would become an addition to the current second story theater and then change the direction of the theater by moving the stage across the alley and on top of the DeHaan lot parking. You can add all the stage elements that are currently missing from the Athenaeum stage to make it more attractive for use by Ballet, Opera and traveling productions. Plus, the theater changes would probably help solve some of the soundproofing issues. Alas,it does not seem to be a part of the strategic plan to conduct a study to determine best use of the property. Seems like the current plan is a quick and easy move that ignores the property best use/potential and any strategic property planning for the effect on future generations.

  2. I recall that MSA's pilings are still in the ground and hard to remove. It’s not likely any proposal will include significant underground construction/parking because of this. Start adding 2 floors of retail, 8 floors of parking and 5-10 floors of possible hotel, and/or 10-20 floors of residential, and you are at 30 floors already with possible expansion of all the uses. But then again I could be wrong.

  3. Accoriding to their website there is no deadline to the Do Not Call list. What is this article referring to??

  4. On what planet are they entitled to this largesse from the stockholders? These people make multi-million dollar salaries: Pay for your own personal travel.

  5. It matters because they're already paid enormously fat salaries: Pay for your own personal travel. Being "taxed on it" isn't a valid excuse--so what? They're still being gifted a raft of luxury perks from somebody else's money on top of an enormous, lavish salary.

ADVERTISEMENT