IBJNews

Indiana furniture maker to exit stock exchange

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The board of directors of Chromcraft Revington Inc., a West Lafayette-based designer and manufacturer of furniture, has decided to delist the firm’s common stock from the New York Stock Exchange, in a move to reduce costs related to being a public company.

The company intends to file the delisting request with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 18, according to a release from the firm on Monday. Later in the month, it will file to suspend reporting obligations.

Shares in Chromcraft are thinly traded, as the firm has fewer than 300 shareholders of record. The stock’s average daily trading volume is just over 7,000 shares, and its market capitalization was about $3.2 million as of Tuesday morning.

“These actions are designed to reduce our operating costs,” said Ronald Butler, the company’s chairman and CEO. “The consequences of remaining an SEC-reporting company, which includes significant costs and management time associated with regulatory compliance, outweighed the current benefits of being a [New York Stock Exchange] company.”

The firm’s most recent annual report has been delayed due to the workload shouldered by the firm’s financial staff. On April 1, the company explained the delay to the SEC by noting that negotiations with a lender “have been ongoing and extensive, and have required [the company] to devote key personnel and administrative resources to these matters.”

The announcement to delist appeared to spark a flurry of trading on Tuesday. Shares had declined nearly 25 percent in value to 49 cents per share in early trading.

The firm still intends to provide quarterly and annual information about its financial performance through press releases and postings to its website, according to company officials.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...

  2. It's good to hear that the festival is continuing to move forward beyond some of the narrow views that seemed to characterize the festival and that I and others had to deal with during our time there.

  3. Corner Bakery announced in March that it had signed agreements to open its first restaurants in Indianapolis by the end of the year. I have not heard anything since but will do some checking.

  4. "The project still is awaiting approval of a waiver filed with the Federal Aviation Administration that would authorize the use of the land for revenue-producing and non-aeronautical purposes." I wonder if the airport will still try to keep from paying taxes on these land tracts, even though they are designated as "non aeronatical?"

  5. How is this frivolous? All they are asking for is medical screenings to test the effects of their exposure. Sounds like the most reasonable lawsuit I've read about in a while. "may not have commited it" which is probably why they're suing to find out the truth. Otherwise they could just ask Walmart, were you negligent? No? OK, thanks for being honest.

ADVERTISEMENT