Indiana GOP probes if campaign used data improperly

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Republican leaders met Wednesday to discuss how to handle allegations that a U.S. Senate campaign improperly tried to access a critical database of voter information.

Party chairman Eric Holcomb declined to comment on the matter, saying he wants to keep the discussion in-house. But the spat has added fuel to an already heated Republican primary between Sen. Richard Lugar and his tea party-backed challenger, Indiana Treasurer Richard Mourdock.

The Republican Party's voter files are incredibly important for any campaign, although especially so for Lugar and Mourdock as they enter the last few weeks before the election. Republicans use the data to determine who to target with phone calls, door knocks, direct mail and other tactics designed to bring their supporters to the polls.

At issue is a March 14 email obtained by The Associated Press in which Mourdock campaign manager Jim Holden writes that Mourdock staffers should "start pillaging email addresses" from a voter database known as Salesforce, which is used by all Indiana Republicans.

"We have a Salesforce login again. Can one of you guys login immediately and start pillaging email addresses like a Viking raider attacking a monestary full of unarmed monks?" Holden wrote. In the email, he also instructed them to take the information, "download into our house file" and remove duplicate entries.

A Republican official familiar with the problem told The Associated Press the Mourdock campaign's access to Salesforce was revoked shortly after the email was discovered. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because the investigation is ongoing.

The Lugar campaign quickly chastised Mourdock after learning about the investigation Wednesday.

"Mr. Mourdock must come clean and answer serious questions if he wishes to represent Hoosiers in the United States Senate," Lugar campaign manager Emily Krueger said in a statement.

But Mourdock spokesman Chris Conner denied that the campaign had accessed the software. He called the email a "joke" that was "taken out of context." He said he doesn't believe there was any wrongdoing.

Indiana Republicans rely on two voter databases. The first database, Voter Vault, is a national database maintained by the national Republican Party and mined for raw voter data by state parties. National Democrats use a similar system to bring voters to the polls who will vote for their candidates. Salesforce is the software used by the Indiana Republican Party and individually licensed to candidates for use.

If the Mourdock campaign did a mass download of the voter files as indicated in Holden's March 14 email, it may have violated its licensing agreement.

Mourdock presents a major challenge to the six-term incumbent Lugar in the May 8 Republican primary, relying largely on help from such national conservative groups as the Club for Growth and the National Rifle Association.


  • Another reason not to vote for Mourdock
    Oh let's see, a Republican cndidate getting some names from a list of Republican voters compiled for the Republican party. The Democratic party would never do anything like...uh wait, didn't some Democratic party members commit forgery to get Hilary Clinton and Barack Obama on the ballot in Indiana for the 2008 election? And nobody said anything when the signatures of Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck and even Adolph Hitler appeared on the petition?

    Either way, any unethical behavior by any operative of a candidate of any political party is a good reason not to vote for that candidate.

    As voters, we need to keep the dirtbags out of elected office in the first place.
  • No surpise here.
    Another Republican campaign cheating to try to win. That's no longer news.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am so impressed that the smoking ban FAILED in Kokomo! I might just move to your Awesome city!

  2. way to much breweries being built in indianapolis. its going to be saturated market, if not already. when is enough, enough??

  3. This house is a reminder of Hamilton County history. Its position near the interstate is significant to remember what Hamilton County was before the SUPERBROKERs, Navients, commercial parks, sprawling vinyl villages, and acres of concrete retail showed up. What's truly Wasteful is not reusing a structure that could still be useful. History isn't confined to parks and books.

  4. To compare Connor Prairie or the Zoo to a random old house is a big ridiculous. If it were any where near the level of significance there wouldn't be a major funding gap. Put a big billboard on I-69 funded by the tourism board for people to come visit this old house, and I doubt there would be any takers, since other than age there is no significance whatsoever. Clearly the tax payers of Fishers don't have a significant interest in this project, so PLEASE DON'T USE OUR VALUABLE MONEY. Government money is finite and needs to be utilized for the most efficient and productive purposes. This is far from that.

  5. I only tried it 2x and didn't think much of it both times. With the new apts plus a couple other of new developments on Guilford, I am surprised it didn't get more business. Plus you have a couple of subdivisions across the street from it. I hope Upland can keep it going. Good beer and food plus a neat environment and outdoor seating.