House passes measure fixing unemployment fund

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana House approved a bill Monday to help fix the state's bankrupt unemployment insurance fund by reducing jobless benefits for some people and softening tax increases on businesses.

After impassioned debate over the plan, the Republican-led House voted 61-38 mostly along party lines for the plan, which now goes to the Republican-led Senate for consideration. Supporters said the bill was a fair way to fix Indiana's unemployment fund, which currently pays out millions of dollars more in jobless benefits than it takes in through employer taxes.

Bill sponsor Rep. Dan Leonard, R-Huntington, said the bill will repair the fund without putting companies out of business or drastically cutting unemployment checks for most out-of-work Hoosiers. He said businesses make up about two-thirds of the solution with the remaining third on workers.

"It is a balanced approach," he said.

Opponents and labor unions say the benefit reductions would unfairly hurt workers and push the unemployed further into poverty by reducing benefits for seasonal workers and others who they said needed the help from unemployment checks.

Maximum jobless benefits would remain at $390 a week under the bill, but the method of calculating payments would change. Currently, benefits are based on a worker's highest-paid quarter of a 12-month period. The new bill bases benefits on a worker's total wages over a year — a change that would hurt some employees like construction workers who earn more money during summer months than in winter.

Anyone making about $43,000 a year would get the maximum $390 a week under the plan. But Democrats who opposed the bill said the changes would leave plenty of out-of-work residents with smaller checks than they would get under the current system.

"It's not just about formulas," said Rep. Scott Pelath, D-Michigan City. "It's about people who are getting the short end of the stick from this economic system that we have right now."

Union members wearing red shirts watched the debate from the House balcony and applauded and cheered when Democrats complained that the bill would hurt workers. Republicans argued that if businesses took all the responsibility for balancing the state's unemployment fund, it would put companies out of business and leave more workers without jobs.

Republican Rebecca Kubacki, R-Syracuse, addressed the union members, telling them lawmakers aren't asking them to take a huge cut.

"What we're trying to do is solve a problem we have created ourselves," she said. "We all have to pitch in. We all have to make that sacrifice."

In addition to changing benefit calculations to an annual basis, the bill would change some eligibility rules. Workers in plants that have planned shutdowns for retooling would no longer be able to draw unemployment during the shutdowns. Workers who take lump-sum severance pay packages would not be immediately able to file for unemployment, and those who take voluntary buyout packages to leave their jobs would no longer be allowed to collect benefits.

Republicans said that businesses would also share the pain as the state works to turn around its unemployment fund, which has borrowed about $2 billion from the federal government to continue paying jobless benefits.

The legislation reduces business tax increases approved in 2009 that were slated to take effect this year after being delayed by legislators last year. Lawmakers are trying to pass the bill soon so that revised first-quarter tax bills can be sent to businesses. Revised bills based on the current proposal would be lower than the bills already sent out.

The bill also charges businesses a 13-percent surcharge on their unemployment taxes to help pay the interest on the state's loan from the federal government. The state expects to owe about $80 million in interest this year.

The fund wasn't always in trouble. In 2000, the state's unemployment fund had a surplus of $1.6 billion. But lawmakers raised benefit payments for the unemployed and lowered employer premiums, draining the account, and the recession compounded the problem.

Democratic Rep. Steve Stemler of Jeffersonville joined all 60 Republicans in voting for the bill, with the rest of the Democrats opposing the legislation. The bill is expected to get a warm reception in the Republican-controlled Senate, where Senate President Pro Tem David Long, R-Fort Wayne, has said senators will start working on the plan quickly.


  • Sort of OK
    A couple of points - Some folks (me included) have an issue with seasonal layoffs not being eligible. Reducing the benefit would be OK, IF IF IF the shortfall can be made up elsewhere - say, by allowing UI recipients to get food stamps. Then there's the problem of benefit amounts not matching... Again, personal experience - my weekly benefit amount doesn't come out even with the maximum benefit amount. That needs fixed, as well..
  • Not sure what this means for us...
    Thought you'd like to see
  • Benifits Compensations
    What about testing everyone for drugs getting benefits too.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...