IBJNews

Indiana House votes to phase out inheritance tax

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The Indiana House on Tuesday approved a 10-year phase-out of the state's inheritance tax that now brings in about $160 million a year.

House members voted 80-17 in favor of the plan that would more than double the current inheritance tax exemption for children and grandchildren to $250,000 and reduce the tax rate each year until 2022.

Republican Rep. Eric Turner of Cicero, the bill's sponsor, said eliminating the tax would help families keep small businesses and farms. He said it the current system is unfair because it taxes assets that a person had accumulated from their taxed income.

"You've already paid taxes on this money," Turner said.

The phase-out period will help the state afford the revenue losses, estimated to be about $60 million the first year and then an additional $10 million each year until the tax is eliminated, Turner said. Inheritance taxes currently account for about 1 percent of state revenue.

Opponents of phasing out the tax argued is the wrong step to take when budget leaders previously have said the state can't afford the estimated $60 million annual cost to eliminate school textbook fees or allow less-expensive moves such as removing the state's 7 percent sales tax on college textbooks.

"Every year it's, 'Sorry, gee we just don't have the money, it'd really be nice to do that,'" said Rep. Matt Pierce, D-Bloomington.

The state now exempts inheritances of less than $100,000 to children and grandchildren and has a top rate of 10 percent for portions of estates topping $1.5 million. More distant family members and non-relatives face higher rates. Spouses pay no state inheritance taxes.

The new exemption level for close relatives under the House plan would be $250,000, with a $25,000 exemption for others. The plan starts phasing out the tax on estates for those who die after July 1.

Senate budget leaders largely support the House's inheritance tax elimination plan but agreement must be reached on a final version by the end of next week, when legislative leaders expect to adjourn this year's session.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Inheritance Tax
    It seems that we could have gone "cold turkey" on the inheritance tax, adding an offset tax to alcohol, tobacco, and firearms.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, the Athenaeum is going to have to get past the hurdle with the Lockerbie residents and the agreement that the parcel would be residential. Second, and in my opinion, this prime piece of property should include parking, PLUS, a black box theater(s), some market rate and affordable artist housing and a plan to renovate and reconfigure the second story theater. I would negotiate to add the DeHaan property surface parking lot into the development mix, place a one story surface parking garage on the DeHaan lot on the street level (for the Dehaan tenants use during the daytime) and add a second story to the garage that would become an addition to the current second story theater and then change the direction of the theater by moving the stage across the alley and on top of the DeHaan lot parking. You can add all the stage elements that are currently missing from the Athenaeum stage to make it more attractive for use by Ballet, Opera and traveling productions. Plus, the theater changes would probably help solve some of the soundproofing issues. Alas,it does not seem to be a part of the strategic plan to conduct a study to determine best use of the property. Seems like the current plan is a quick and easy move that ignores the property best use/potential and any strategic property planning for the effect on future generations.

  2. I recall that MSA's pilings are still in the ground and hard to remove. It’s not likely any proposal will include significant underground construction/parking because of this. Start adding 2 floors of retail, 8 floors of parking and 5-10 floors of possible hotel, and/or 10-20 floors of residential, and you are at 30 floors already with possible expansion of all the uses. But then again I could be wrong.

  3. Accoriding to their website there is no deadline to the Do Not Call list. What is this article referring to??

  4. On what planet are they entitled to this largesse from the stockholders? These people make multi-million dollar salaries: Pay for your own personal travel.

  5. It matters because they're already paid enormously fat salaries: Pay for your own personal travel. Being "taxed on it" isn't a valid excuse--so what? They're still being gifted a raft of luxury perks from somebody else's money on top of an enormous, lavish salary.

ADVERTISEMENT