IBJNews

Indiana lawmakers plan to float corporate tax cuts

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

State lawmakers plan to propose reducing Indiana’s corporate income tax rate next year in a move they say will make the state a more appealing place for businesses to locate.

But such a plan is likely to be controversial during a legislative session in which state legislators must craft a two-year budget already strained by lower-than-expected tax revenues. Some lawmakers are expressing doubts about the idea.

That won’t deter Sen. Brandt Hershman, R-Lafayette, from filing a bill that would lower a rate he says is high compared with that of other Midwestern states.

“As the economy recovers, we want to make Indiana the most attractive place to locate or grow a business in America,” Hershman said.

Indiana only weighs a single factor—a company’s sales—in the formula that determines the income taxes the company pays. But the state’s 8.5-percent rate exceeds that of neighbors such as Illinois, Ohio, Kentucky, Michigan and Wisconsin.

That can be a problem, economic leaders say, because even though other tax rates are competitive, the 8.5-percent figure causes sticker shock for some businesses early in the process of looking for places to locate.

“It’s kind of a resting (point) for people who look at the rest of our tax rates, which are pretty low,” said Indiana Secretary of Commerce Mitch Roob, one of several state officials and business leaders who met this fall to discuss the tax and other issues as part of an interim study committee on economic development. “When they see that number, they balk at it.”

The committee also heard testimony from Scott Hodge, president of the Tax Foundation, a nonpartisan tax research group. He recommended lowering the corporate income tax rate—possibly to the individual income tax rate of 3.4 percent of federal adjusted gross income—so the difference wouldn’t affect businesses’ decisions.

Hershman said he hasn't determined what rate he’ll propose, but it’s unlikely he’ll suggest eliminating the tax altogether, as states such as Texas and South Dakota have done.

Even so, the proposed reduction likely will be accompanied by concerns about how the state will fill the gap. A report released in the fall by the Indiana Fiscal Policy Institute projected a $1.3 billion budget gap as the state enters its next budget, which legislators will craft next session.

Money from corporate income taxes makes up about 5 percent of the state’s revenue, according to the fiscal policy institute.

John Ketzenberger, the group’s president, said bringing in additional jobs will take time, while the revenue loss will be instantaneous. That will leave policymakers to weigh whether it’s worth giving up the money in an effort to attract more investment.

“In the short erm, at least, it will be very difficult because the state already is looking at a deficit, and that’s on a flat-line budget basis,” Ketzenberger said. “Any dollar they give up anywhere else is going to have to be filled in or cuts made to offset that revenue loss. That’ll make it a tough political decision, no question about it.”

Rep. Win Moses, a Fort Wayne Democrat who sits on the Indiana House Ways and Means Committee, worried that any additional cuts in revenue would adversely impact Indiana’s schools.

Republican House Speaker Brian Bosma has said education would be the last item to be looked at in terms of cuts, but Moses said it could be “the only thing left to cut” if more trims are needed. That, he said, could put Indiana further behind in producing the well-educated workforce needed to draw employers in skilled sectors such as life sciences.

Moses said it’s not worth the tradeoff.

“If, in fact, they’re going to give money to businesses, they’re going to take it away from somebody, and the group that’s most exposed is the Indiana public schools,” Moses said. “It could cause far greater future problems than it solves.”

Hershman acknowledged the need to account for the revenue, but he said the income tax is a less valuable target than some other tax sources. That’s because larger multinational companies have the ability to shift profits overseas, allowing them to avoid paying income taxes in the U.S.

The lawmaker isn’t banking on more companies paying income taxes here if rates are lower, but he said it should help smaller companies that don’t have the ability to offshore their income.

“It most likely would be seen as a benefit to smaller corporations in Indiana,” Hershman said, “as well as a way to attract new business growth and job-related growth.” 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • GOP Plan
    To pay for this corporate welfare program, Indiana will further cut spending to eduction, seniors, the unemployed, and for children in need. Of course these legislatures all have incomes that allow them to send their kids to private schools, retire to resort communities, and live off of the kick backs they receive from the corporate special interests.

    Mitch and the GOP want to make Indiana the best state for "legalized" slave labor, child labor, and below minimum wage income
  • Paying the bills
    When will they learn that their is no free lunch?

    You either raise revenue or decrease expenses to get balance, not lower revenue and increase expenses and call it a balanced budget.
  • Hershman the Demogogue
    People should read the Tax Foundations State Business Tax Index.

    You will find Indiana in the top ten most favorable business tax climates in the nation.

    Most of the time you get exactly what you pay for.
  • Thinks about it
    Indiana has been slowly falling behind because we can not give the quality of life or services that other states can provide. Keep the tax or slightly lower it and use this money for the use of disruptive technologies in the future. What will Indiana do if it turns up the new high speed rails in other states are a giant economic boost and our leaders are sitting in Indianapolis with an empty checkbook?
  • LLC Tax Rate
    Isn't income from LLC's already taxed at the individual rate of 3.4%? If so, the LLCs already have the tax rate the state is talking about trying to take corps. to, so why would they get a further tax break? If that's right, they don't seem to need the relief from 8.5%
  • How About LLC ?
    Many small business are taxed as LLCs and not corporations so if they limit it to just corp. then no relief for LLCs ?

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

    2. Shouldn't this be a museum

    3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

    4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

    5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

    ADVERTISEMENT