Indiana lawmakers still hoping to adjourn Thursday

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana lawmakers moved closer Wednesday to reaching a compromise on a bill that would prevent companies from banning guns that employees keep in their locked cars while on company property.

But Democrats who control the House and Republicans who rule the Senate remained at odds over legislation involving unemployment insurance taxes, giving schools ways to offset $300 million in budget cuts and tax credits and other incentives designed to create jobs.

Legislative leaders had planned to adjourn Thursday, more than a week before a March 14 statutory deadline for doing so. Senate President Pro Tem David Long, R-Fort Wayne, said his chamber was willing to go beyond that date to resolve those major issues, and progress was being made in back-room negotiations.

But House Speaker Patrick Bauer, D-South Bend, suggested little progress was being made and it might be best to stick to a midnight Thursday deadline.

"If we haven't done this in two months, what hope is there that we could do it beyond tomorrow?" Bauer said late Wednesday afternoon.

The state could save about $100,000 if the General Assembly adjourned Thursday, he said.

"We're not getting any response, so it's better to go home," Bauer said. "It's better to say, 'We did our best and God bless you.'"

But negotiators were nearing an agreement on a bill that would give workers the right to keep weapons locked in their car trunks or out of sight in locked vehicles parked on their employers' property.

"We're getting very close," said Sen. Johnny Nugent, R-Lawrenceburg and a member of the board of the National Rifle Association.

A proposed draft by negotiators would exempt more employers from the legislation. They would include investor-own natural gas and electric utilities, certain chemical plants, and agencies whose drivers transport developmentally disabled people.

Earlier versions already had exemptions for school property, child care centers, domestic violence shelters and group homes.

Business lobbyists and advocates for domestic violence victims oppose the bill because of possible workplace violence. However, the NRA and other supporters argue the bill would only allow people with the legal right to carry a weapon to bring it to work — and then only as far as the parking lot, where it must remain locked in their car.

Meanwhile, Rep. Charlie Brown, D-Gary, and Rep. Eric Turner, R-Marion — sponsors of legislation that would impose a statewide smoking ban in most public places — said they were trying to revive it. They said it was possible they could do it by blocking other legislation backed by the Senate.

However, Long said the Senate would not discuss the smoking ban further this session.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!