IBJNews

Indiana lawmakers still hoping to adjourn Thursday

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana lawmakers moved closer Wednesday to reaching a compromise on a bill that would prevent companies from banning guns that employees keep in their locked cars while on company property.

But Democrats who control the House and Republicans who rule the Senate remained at odds over legislation involving unemployment insurance taxes, giving schools ways to offset $300 million in budget cuts and tax credits and other incentives designed to create jobs.

Legislative leaders had planned to adjourn Thursday, more than a week before a March 14 statutory deadline for doing so. Senate President Pro Tem David Long, R-Fort Wayne, said his chamber was willing to go beyond that date to resolve those major issues, and progress was being made in back-room negotiations.

But House Speaker Patrick Bauer, D-South Bend, suggested little progress was being made and it might be best to stick to a midnight Thursday deadline.

"If we haven't done this in two months, what hope is there that we could do it beyond tomorrow?" Bauer said late Wednesday afternoon.

The state could save about $100,000 if the General Assembly adjourned Thursday, he said.

"We're not getting any response, so it's better to go home," Bauer said. "It's better to say, 'We did our best and God bless you.'"

But negotiators were nearing an agreement on a bill that would give workers the right to keep weapons locked in their car trunks or out of sight in locked vehicles parked on their employers' property.

"We're getting very close," said Sen. Johnny Nugent, R-Lawrenceburg and a member of the board of the National Rifle Association.

A proposed draft by negotiators would exempt more employers from the legislation. They would include investor-own natural gas and electric utilities, certain chemical plants, and agencies whose drivers transport developmentally disabled people.

Earlier versions already had exemptions for school property, child care centers, domestic violence shelters and group homes.

Business lobbyists and advocates for domestic violence victims oppose the bill because of possible workplace violence. However, the NRA and other supporters argue the bill would only allow people with the legal right to carry a weapon to bring it to work — and then only as far as the parking lot, where it must remain locked in their car.

Meanwhile, Rep. Charlie Brown, D-Gary, and Rep. Eric Turner, R-Marion — sponsors of legislation that would impose a statewide smoking ban in most public places — said they were trying to revive it. They said it was possible they could do it by blocking other legislation backed by the Senate.

However, Long said the Senate would not discuss the smoking ban further this session.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT