IBJNews

Indiana lawmakers to face more tough budget decisions

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Lawmakers who watched Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels slash millions of dollars in state spending over the last two fiscal years will face tough decisions of their own starting in a few days as they meet to create a new two-year state spending plan.

"It's a new role for us," said Senate Appropriations Chairman Luke Kenley, a Republican from Noblesville. "The governor has carried the ball for the last couple years in terms of making the hard decisions, making the cuts, forcing discipline. Now the Legislature is going to have to do its share."

When lawmakers open their new session Wednesday, they won't have some of the advantages they had during the last budget-writing debate in 2009. This time around, there will be no $1 billion in federal stimulus money to keep the budget afloat. The state's reserves are nearly drained. And Daniels has already made cuts to state agencies, public schools and colleges — leaving some lawmakers wondering where there's fat left to be cut.

"They're having to deal with the reality that a lot of other states have had to deal with," said John Ketzenberger, president of the Indiana Fiscal Policy Institute.

Indiana has faced similar problems as other states during the recession, Ketzenberger said, but had the advantage of a surplus and a governor willing to make cuts.

Since the last two-year, $27 billion budget was approved by lawmakers in 2009, Daniels cut $300 million from public schools and $150 million from higher education as state tax revenues dropped below budgeted projections. More than 400 state employees have been laid off. The state's largest teachers union estimates that 3,000 teachers lost their jobs because of the cuts, and class sizes have increased while programs have been cut.

But Daniels and state budget director Adam Horst say the state should be able to have balanced budget for the next two years without tax increases or more funding cuts to public schools.

"It won't be easy, but it will be manageable," Daniels said. "If we just maintain some discipline and think more or less in terms of holding the line on spending, I think we'll be fine."

Daniels' fellow Republicans will largely control the budget-writing process in the General Assembly after the GOP won control of the House away from Democrats in the November election by capturing a 60-40 majority and adding to their strong Senate majority.

The state is currently spending more money than it takes in and has been using cash reserves and federal stimulus money to balance the budget.

The revenue forecast released in December shows that Indiana is expected to take in $13.4 billion in fiscal year 2012 and $13.9 billion in 2013. Those are increases over current revenues, but current spending is about $13.9 billion — so even if the state didn't increase its spending, Indiana would likely spend about $500 million more in the first year of the budget than it brought in.

And because some areas of the budget will grow — such as Medicaid — lawmakers say the structural deficit will likely be larger than $500 million.

Kenley, the Senate appropriations chairman, estimates that the General Assembly will have to cut about $1 billion from current spending to cover the gap and leave a healthy amount in reserve. He said it's possible to do that without cutting education, but lawmakers will have to hold tight on spending and make tough decisions about cuts elsewhere.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Someone Needs to Get the Facts Straight
    Wait a minute! How cna you report a cash surplus of $2.1B in one article and then cite concerns over next year's budget due to the State's reserves being nearly depleted. Really?
  • Republican Hypocrisy
    Jim, Absolutely right on. I was thinking the same thing as I read this article. And for the record folks, I voted for Mitch AND Obama in 2008, and still support them both.
    But I detest the hypocrisy.
  • Mitch needs to give credit to Obama for last year's keeping the state afloat
    Mitch in all his rant about the stimulus money as bad for everyone, sure used it and put a spin on it as being his fiscal management. The truth is, he had no policy, and without Obama and the Stimulus money, he would have let this state go down the drain. Let see how he comes up with a plan that keeps services going to those in need, government functioning, and our kids educateed, health care given to those in need, police and fire, and teachers employed. Of course his business stimulus is all about uneducated, untrained labor that will be forced to work for a buck an hour.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Great article and post scripts by Mike L (Great addition to IBJ BTW). Bobby's stubborn as a mule, and doubt if he ever comes back to IU. But the love he would receive would be enormous. Hope he shows some time, but not counting on it.

  2. When the Indiana GOP was going around the State selling the Voucher bill they were promising people that the vouchers would only be for public charter schools. They lied. As usual.

  3. I am Mr. Morris Ray, a Legitimate And a Reputable money Lender. We lend funds out to individuals in need of financial assistance, we give loan to people that have a bad credit or in need of money to pay bills, to invest on business. Have you been looking for loan? you have not to worry, because you are in the right place i offer loan at low interest rate of 2% so if you are in need of a loan i want you to just contact me via this email Address: morris_ray123@outlook.com

  4. Jim, your "misleading" numbers comment is spot on. This is the spin these posers are putting on it. News flash, fans: these guys lie. They are not publicly traded so no one holds them accountable for anything they say. The TV numbers are so miniscule to begin with any "increase" produces double digit "growth" numbers. It's ridiculous to think that anything these guys have done has awakened the marketplace. What have they done? Consolidate the season so they run more races on consecutive weekends? And this creates "momentum." Is that the same momentum you enjoy when you don't race between August and March? Keep in mind that you are running teams who barely make ends meet ragged over the summer to accomplish this brilliant strategy of avoiding the NFL while you run your season finale at midnight on the East Coast. But I should not obfuscate my own point: any "ratings increase" is exactly what Jim points to - the increased availability of NBC Sports in households. Look fans, I love the sport to but these posers are running it off a cliff. Miles wants to declare victory and then run for Mayor. I could go on and on but bottom line for God's sake don't believe a word they say. Note to Anthony - try doing just a little research instead of reporting what these pretenders say and then offering an "opinion" no more informed than the average fan.

  5. If he's finally planning to do the right thing and resign, why not do it before the election? Waiting until after means what - s special election at tax payer expense? Appointment (by whom?) thus robbing the voters of their chance to choose? Does he accrue some additional financial advantage to waiting, like extra pension payments? What's in it for him? That's the question that needs to be asked.

ADVERTISEMENT