IBJNews

Indiana littered with 2,100 leaking underground tanks

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The state environmental agency is using $4 million in federal money to clean up 28 sites with leaking underground storage tanks, although that will barely make a dent in Indiana's problem.

The Indiana Department of Environmental Management is tracking about 2,100 sites with leaking tanks, many of which contain gasoline and diesel fuel that can damage soil and contaminate groundwater. Property owners are responsible for most of those cleanups, which the state agency estimates that would cost $400 million to complete.

Many of the 28 sites being cleaned up using federal stimulus money have been abandoned.

"Typically, those are sites where the responsible party is no longer around or is bankrupt," said Bruce Palin, IDEM's assistant commissioner for the office of land quality, told The Journal Gazette of Fort Wayne for a story Monday.

In one such case, the agency is planning a $130,000 cleanup for the former Jerry's Marathon in the Allen County town of Monroeville. The building is dilapidated and the lot is littered with debris that the property owner hasn't addressed despite warnings going back to 2006.

An inspector with IDEM visited the site Sept. 12 and found not much had changed since the previous inspection months earlier — cans and boxes in the building, piles of wood and a rusting car in the gravel.

"Facility abandoned — tanks still exist," the inspection report said.

Laws passed in the 1980s required that property owners notify the federal government if they had underground tanks. If they did, the tank also had to meet, by 1998, new regulations designed to help prevent leaks.

While this caused many property owners to replace their tanks with improved models, some also simply walked away, abandoning their property. New property owners would take over and often not know it had a tank until a leak occurred.

"A lot of times, you end up dealing with people who just didn't know and are trying to correct a problem they never knew existed," said Cheryl Ryan, the director of business development at SES Environmental, a company with a Fort Wayne office that repairs and addresses damage done by underground storage tanks.

State environmental officials have spent $2.6 million of the federal grant the agency received in 2009.

The agency says some 200 to 300 cleanups area completed each year around Indiana, while it receives 150 to 170 new confirmed reports of leaking tanks during the same time.

The state's current list of about 2,150 leaking tanks simply covers those that IDEM know about, with an unknown number of others that have yet to be detected.

"It's a continual moving target," agency spokesman Barry Sneed said. "The number is always changing."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • HOMEOWNERS BEWARE
    This LAW is NOT JUST for businesses ohh no it isnt now lets look at all the home opwners that have buried fuel oil tanks WAY past A 25 yr life ? all homeowners need to look at their own problems with their storage tankls !! Imagine how many are in fact rotted leaking an out dated MANY MANY MANY more than a lousy 2500 although most are 500 to 1000 gallon holding and that MY dear freinds can Contaminate a LOT OF LAND !and cost you a fortune !
  • Just a thought...
    $4 million to clean up 28 sites extrapolates to $300 million to clean up 2100 sites, which is roughly equal to .02% of $1.437 trillion - the combined 2010 revenue of ExxonMobil, Royal Dutch Shell, BP, Chevron and ConocoPhillips.
  • Clean up fund
    Apparently this is an age old problem which seems pretty easy to correct. Place a fee per gallon on all gasoling sales (fee to be paid by either the station owner, or oil distributor, or both, but not customers). Then when the property is vacated, funds will be available to fix the ongoing problems. It is hard to believe that our politicians have not acted to protect the public in this regard for so many years; that's what happens when their campaigns are paid for by the corporations they should be protecting us from.
  • It isn't legal.
    It isn't legal to sell a property with a known defect without full disclosure, but it's a civil matter for the new owner to collect damages from the old owner- who undoubtedly skipped the state years ago.
  • Underground tanks
    Just because there is a law against something doesn't mean the regulator (government) will actually enforce the law. That's why IDEM is such a joke and EPA has to threaten to take over things IDEM is supposed to take care of according to not just state but federal laws. Anti-environmentalists cry they are over-regulated, but the truth is there's little real enforcement going on and the damage grows to be found by future generations who will curse ours for being too shortsighted and weak to stop the crimes and criminals when it isn't too late.
  • Warning: Underground Tank
    How can it be legal to sell property and not disclose that there is an out dated underground tank? If the property owner walked away from it, how is he making a living now? Put a lien against his income and any other property he has.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

    2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

    3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

    4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

    5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?

    ADVERTISEMENT