Indiana Medicaid cuts likely to be followed by more

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana's Medicaid program will reduce dental and vision benefits for adults and cut payments to some providers beginning Saturday, and more cuts are likely in the coming months as the state struggles to control the burgeoning costs of the public health insurance plan.

The Office of Medicaid Policy and Planning has approved without comment a series of emergency rules that it expects to save a total of $4.1 million over the next six months, spokesman Marcus Barlow said.

But that will make up for only a small portion of the $31.4 million shortfall the agency anticipates for the fiscal year that ends June 30.

"This is just one round. We expect more changes in the future," Barlow said. Advocates said the rule changes, including prior authorizations for non-emergency hospital stays and lower reimbursements to podiatrists, chiropractors and home care attendants, will affect elderly and disabled people the most. Services for those groups account for about two-thirds of Medicaid spending in Indiana and provide the biggest targets as lawmakers and the administration of Gov. Mitch Daniels seek to rein in a state Medicaid bill expected to increase by about 25 percent during the current fiscal year and the next one.

Public health insurance advocate David Roos of Covering Kids & Families of Indiana said the rule changes taking effect Saturday were the least controversial and easiest for Indiana Medicaid to make.

"The remaining cuts will be much, much tougher. They will be down to the bone," Roos said Thursday.

The emergency rules were instituted without the usual public notice and comment procedures, but they expire in 90 days. They can be extended once for another 90 days. Barlow said the Medicaid office will aim to make the cuts permanent.

They are expected to save the state $12.3 million during the full 12 months of fiscal year 2012 and $13.3 million in 2013, Barlow said.

Spokeswoman Sally Morris of The Arc of Indiana, which represents developmentally disabled people, said the cuts caused concern but there's more worry about the unspecified ones still to come.

"It is a huge concern what will happen with the Medicaid program," she said. Capping dental services at $1,000 per year for Medicaid members over age 21 will save about $1.5 million over the next six months, Barlow said. The cap is expected to affect fewer than 7,000 of Indiana's roughly 400,000 adults on Medicaid, he said.

However, the cap could have the unintended effect of driving some Medicaid recipients with severe toothaches, infections and other dental emergencies to hospital emergency rooms, thus shifting costs to hospitals, since hospitals are barred by law from turning away patients, said Doug Bush, executive director of the Indiana Dental Association.

"We don't think this is going to result in a net cost savings to the state," Bush said.

Barlow said the dental association was painting "a doomsday scenario."

The Indiana Hospital Association issued a statement noting "the harsh, fiscal realities the state faces and that tough decisions must be made."

"At the same time, it is true that in the absence of routine care, all roads lead to the emergency room," the statement said.

Dr. Bernard Emkes, past president of the Indiana State Medical Association and one of the group's Medicaid experts, said the cuts were fair given the drop in state tax revenues. He noted that all health care providers absorbed an earlier across-the-board cut in Medicaid reimbursements.

"The dilemma is we're caught between a rock and a hard place. The state has no money right now," said Emkes, an Indianapolis family physician.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?