IBJNews

Indiana Medicaid cuts likely to be followed by more

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana's Medicaid program will reduce dental and vision benefits for adults and cut payments to some providers beginning Saturday, and more cuts are likely in the coming months as the state struggles to control the burgeoning costs of the public health insurance plan.

The Office of Medicaid Policy and Planning has approved without comment a series of emergency rules that it expects to save a total of $4.1 million over the next six months, spokesman Marcus Barlow said.

But that will make up for only a small portion of the $31.4 million shortfall the agency anticipates for the fiscal year that ends June 30.

"This is just one round. We expect more changes in the future," Barlow said. Advocates said the rule changes, including prior authorizations for non-emergency hospital stays and lower reimbursements to podiatrists, chiropractors and home care attendants, will affect elderly and disabled people the most. Services for those groups account for about two-thirds of Medicaid spending in Indiana and provide the biggest targets as lawmakers and the administration of Gov. Mitch Daniels seek to rein in a state Medicaid bill expected to increase by about 25 percent during the current fiscal year and the next one.

Public health insurance advocate David Roos of Covering Kids & Families of Indiana said the rule changes taking effect Saturday were the least controversial and easiest for Indiana Medicaid to make.

"The remaining cuts will be much, much tougher. They will be down to the bone," Roos said Thursday.

The emergency rules were instituted without the usual public notice and comment procedures, but they expire in 90 days. They can be extended once for another 90 days. Barlow said the Medicaid office will aim to make the cuts permanent.

They are expected to save the state $12.3 million during the full 12 months of fiscal year 2012 and $13.3 million in 2013, Barlow said.

Spokeswoman Sally Morris of The Arc of Indiana, which represents developmentally disabled people, said the cuts caused concern but there's more worry about the unspecified ones still to come.

"It is a huge concern what will happen with the Medicaid program," she said. Capping dental services at $1,000 per year for Medicaid members over age 21 will save about $1.5 million over the next six months, Barlow said. The cap is expected to affect fewer than 7,000 of Indiana's roughly 400,000 adults on Medicaid, he said.

However, the cap could have the unintended effect of driving some Medicaid recipients with severe toothaches, infections and other dental emergencies to hospital emergency rooms, thus shifting costs to hospitals, since hospitals are barred by law from turning away patients, said Doug Bush, executive director of the Indiana Dental Association.

"We don't think this is going to result in a net cost savings to the state," Bush said.

Barlow said the dental association was painting "a doomsday scenario."

The Indiana Hospital Association issued a statement noting "the harsh, fiscal realities the state faces and that tough decisions must be made."

"At the same time, it is true that in the absence of routine care, all roads lead to the emergency room," the statement said.

Dr. Bernard Emkes, past president of the Indiana State Medical Association and one of the group's Medicaid experts, said the cuts were fair given the drop in state tax revenues. He noted that all health care providers absorbed an earlier across-the-board cut in Medicaid reimbursements.

"The dilemma is we're caught between a rock and a hard place. The state has no money right now," said Emkes, an Indianapolis family physician.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

  2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

  3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

  4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

  5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.

ADVERTISEMENT