IBJNews

Indiana moving slowly on lake phosphorus rules

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A state effort to address phosphorous pollution that has fouled Indiana's waterways is moving forward slowly, but environmental groups' hopes for help from lawmakers is likely to be dashed this year.

The Indiana Department of Environmental Management is working on new rules to establish numeric standards for phosphorus in lakes. But a bill that would place restrictions on the application of lawn fertilizer containing phosphorous is unlikely to get a hearing in the House, according to Casey Arqawi, press secretary for state Rep. Dick Dodge, R-Pleasant Lake.

The Indiana Conservation Alliance, whose 30 members include the Indiana Wildlife Federation, The Nature Conservancy and the Indiana Lakes Management Society, had made passage of the bill a priority, but the boycott by House Democrats over divisive right-to-work legislation caused delays that could make it difficult for the bill to be heard, Arqawi told The Star Press.

Phosphorus has been blamed for algae blooms that have tainted waterways across the state in recent years.

In August 2011, state officials found high levels of blue-green algae at eight of 13 public swimming beaches sampled, including Potato Creek State Park, Chain O'Lakes State Park and Raccoon State Recreation Area. Sampling by IUPUI also found high levels of the algae, also known as cyanobacteria, in Geist, Morse, Eagle Creek and Patoka reservoirs.

A similar bloom in Prairie Creek Reservoir in 2010 affected about 700,000 drinking water customers in Muncie, Indianapolis and other communities, causing a horrible smell and taste that lasted for days.

Exposure to blue-green algae during swimming, wading and water-skiing can lead to rashes, skin and eye irritation and other issues, including nausea, stomach aches and tingling in fingers and toes.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in 1988 recommended that states accelerate the adoption of nutrient standards for water bodies. The EPA has continued to encourage states to adopt standards since that time.

Shivi Selvaratnam, a technical water quality specialist at IDEM, said the state is in the process of adopting standards for lakes and reservoirs. The pending phosphorus rule also would affect municipal wastewater treatment plants.

Selvaratnam said officials hope to draft rule language by the end of the summer.

If Indiana does not finish the rule-making, the EPA could apply national lakes nutrient criteria to Indiana lakes.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Phosphorus Bad/Legislature Worse!
    How can our legislature find time for "Right to Work" legislation, be so slow to enact meaningful non-smoking legislation and even have a member consider introducing legislation to regulate how the National Anthem is sung, and yet put off consideration of something that adversely affects the citizens they supposedly represent? This Republican controlled government continues to amaze me with their disdain for the needs of the people.
  • priorities
    glad to know we can push RTW, but the health of a basic need is tossed aside.....

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT