Boycotting Indiana House Democrats say they'll stay in Illinois until Republicans back off a handful of bills they consider
an assault on the middle class — even though some of those sticking points may not have much of a future anyway.
For example, one of the Republican proposals Democrats consider most onerous is a voucher bill that would use taxpayer money
to help parents send their children to private school. But House Speaker Brian Bosma, R-Indianapolis, said that bill is likely
headed for major changes regardless of the Democrats' ongoing boycott of the House, where Republicans hold a 60-40 majority.
To win solid support for the bill from his own caucus, Bosma said Republicans are considering limiting the number of students
who could receive vouchers and may further restrict qualifying income levels so that vouchers are directed to more needy students.
Currently the bill includes no cap on the number of students who can participate, and families of four making up to $81,000
a year could receive a scholarship to a private school. That income limit is lower than the original proposal, which would
have allowed families of four making more than $100,000 to receive vouchers.
Bosma predicted the voucher bill could pass the House with about 55 votes, but only after amendments are adopted.
"It's going to take some changes," he said.
Nearly 50 amendments have been filed on the voucher bill, most by Democrats, and Bosma said the House would likely adopt
some Democratic amendments that make sense. However, adopting amendments — or conducting any House business —
requires a quorum, and the Democrats' boycott has prevented that from happening.
House Democrats don't like the voucher bill and want it dropped from the Republican agenda altogether, although they
haven't made that an explicit condition of their return from Urbana, Ill., where they have been staying in a hotel since
beginning their boycott last Tuesday.
House Minority Leader Patrick Bauer, D-South Bend, said his caucus is "absolutely against vouchers, period." But
he didn't rule out a compromise if Republicans would be willing to negotiate.
"That's a tough one," Bauer told reporters Monday by phone from Illinois, saying there is room for compromise.
Bosma has urged Democrats to return and said Monday that he'd talk to Bauer if he came back to Indianapolis. But talking
isn't the same as negotiating. Bosma insists that he won't negotiate any items of the agenda outright, and says he
won't make any "back room deals" with Bauer to change bills. Bosma said amendments should be dealt with in public
on the House floor.
"If they're holding the process hostage, I'm not responding in a positive way to that," Bosma said of Democrats.
"I'm just not going to reward the behavior."
Republicans could easily defeat any Democratic amendments, so Bauer said he wants to negotiate with Bosma to get some assurance
that changes to "take away some of the pain" of the bills will be accepted before bringing his caucus back to the
Statehouse.
"If they would say they'd accept some amendments, it's a whole different story," Bauer said.
The Democrats' boycott has already killed a so-called "right-to-work" bill that would have prohibited union
membership from being a condition of employment. Republicans say they won't try to resurrect that proposal. But Bosma
said he will not allow the boycott to kill other bills and plans to extend legislative deadlines to keep the other proposals
on the House calendar alive as long as necessary.
Democrats, who haven't outlined specifics of changes they want before they'll return, say they simply want Republicans
to negotiate.
"The other side has to be willing to talk," said Rep. Scott Pelath, D-Michigan City. "When you begin to talk,
then you can begin to identify the specifics that are very important to both sides. But we haven't gotten to that point
yet."

















IBJ Conversations
19 Comments
Add Comment
What happens to the tax dollars that singles and childless parents (and parents who kids have finished school) pay?? Perhaps if the GOP were serious about this -- they'd pass a bill mandating that ONLY PARENTS pay for schools!
In addition to that, what is this going to do the the waiting lists at private schools? So, deserving kids will be turned away because tax payers are footing the bill for other kids? On top of that, how can we try to keep the "riff raff" out of the private schools if just anyone can go there?? This is a bad idea all the way around. I am opposed to this and will let my lawmakers know it in no uncertain terms. If your schools aren't up to your standards, do something about it! Or move! PAY YOUR OWN WAY PEOPLE!!!!
People who wanted a public option and could move, did. People who couldn't or wouldn't move pushed and got magnet and charters. People who did and said nothing, are going to still do nothing. Vouchers are a hollow solution to a serious problem. Teachers and school are only part of the issue; parents that care is a separate and distinct issue that can not be legislated. Vouchers are likely not the boon that private schools hoped as the bill as proposed excludes those who already could afford the change and made it. Sadly, "afford" is not necessarily the case as there are those who care so much about their children's education that they've made serious sacrifices to pay for private options. This bill is bad because it doesn't help those who care. Those who don't are already lost.
Also the taxpayers fund scholarships and loans for college age kids and they can use those at the school of their choice, including religious schools.
While many private schools are affiliated with faiths, that is not universally the case. So my question is are you against a private schools in general or just religious ones? And, even though it is repeating "ItsMyMoney" it is not inherently the government's money. It is first and foremost the parent's money. Only an act of law transforms it into tax money. So essentially this law simply exempts that money from taxation if earmarked for private education.
How come there isn't more press about the charges they are racking up while "protesting"?
Beyond that, if someone making $81K per year wants to send their child to a religious school, let them do it with their own money. I make far less than that and managed to send both of my kids to private school using the school's financial aid process and my own funds--plus paid into the public school system that I wasn't even using. I never expected the good people of Indiana to pay for what was a personal choice.