IBJNews

Indiana's wind power industry faces unclear future

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana's once-promising wind-power industry is facing an uncertain future as Congress debates whether to renew a tax credit that's set to expire by the end of the year.

A few years ago, Indiana had one of the nation's fastest-growing wind-energy industries with turbines along the rural horizon in north and central counties. In 2009, the state had the second highest power capacity for new wind of any state, according to the American Wind Energy Association.

But the recession slowed growth and a federal production tax credit that aids the industry's growth is set to expire Dec. 31 unless Congress acts to renew that credit in a heated election year.

"There's such uncertainty in the market right now, it just causes these people to go berserk," said Laura Arnold, who is on the board of directors of the Indiana Renewable Energy Association. "Uncertainty is not a positive stimulus for the growth of the industry."

Arnold told the Journal & Courier for a Monday story that if the tax credit abruptly ends then the wind energy sector will likely cool off, and that a gradual phasing out of the credit was preferable.

The credit is worth 2.2 cents per kilowatt hour produced or a payment of 30 percent of the project's eligible costs.

Arnold said one issue is certain to slow the decision-making process — the federal tax credit's expiration date falls during the upcoming lame duck session of Congress. She said she doubts the matter will be taken up before the election.

Indiana currently has 799 turbines producing 1,339.2 megawatts of power, according to the Indiana Office of Energy Development.

Expansions to the once rapidly growing 303-turbine, 500-megawatt capacity Meadow Lake Wind Farm in White County — and two smaller projects there — are stalled on the federal tax credit issue.

In Tipton and Madison counties, the first phase of a 200-megawatt and 125-turbine project is under construction and planned to be complete by the end of the year, but developer E-on Climate & Renewables said growth beyond that is uncertain.

Construction on the farm's first phase started this summer. But E-on Climate & Renewables product manager Andy Melka said the tax credit's expiration could hinder the wind farm's growth.

"The expiring tax credit does not affect Phase One, but it could affect the expansion phases we had planned," Melka said.

Indianapolis-based Performance Services, the developer on the wind farm project on land owned by Purdue University, said his project will move forward without a tax credit.

"That's clearly out of our control so if it happens, it happens," said Scott Zigmond, the company's vice president of sales and marketing. "We've invested a great amount of money and time. We're not going anywhere."

Wind farm projects usually contribute to economic growth in rural areas, typically bringing an influx of temporary construction jobs and millions or billions of dollars in capital investment.

Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., said Friday at the fourth annual Collegiate Energy Summit at Purdue University that he supports the extension of the credit but acknowledged that wind farms "are not everyone's cup of tea."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Whoops
    "failure" should have been "in favor"
  • Always Has Been Dependent on the Government
    The wind industry is a political animal. It never has made sense economically, that's why every time the tax credits go away the industry dies. If you want to be a failure renewables, have at it. However, don't ever try to make the case that it makes sense economically.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

    2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

    3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

    4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

    5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

    ADVERTISEMENT