IBJNews

Indiana Senate panel advances marijuana, meth bills

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A state Senate committee on Tuesday backed having the state crime policy panel study whether Indiana should legalize marijuana after hearing a legislator with multiple sclerosis say he wished he could legally try the drug to relieve his pain.

The committee also approved a bill requiring computerized tracking of cold medications used in making methamphetamine rather than mandating prescriptions, as some law enforcement groups urged.

The Senate's criminal law committee voted 5-3 to advance to the full Senate the bill directing the criminal law and sentencing study committee to examine Indiana's marijuana laws next summer and make recommendations.

Bill sponsor Sen. Karen Tallian, D-Portage, said she was concerned about the undetermined millions of dollars state and local governments were spending each year on police, prosecutors, courts and jails to enforce marijuana laws.

"We need to be able to say to the citizens of Indiana, 'This is how much it's costing us and is this where you want to spend your money and your tax dollars?'" Tallian said.

Rep. Tom Knollman, who has multiple sclerosis and uses a walker, told committee members he regarded himself one of the most conservative members of the Legislature but that he believed legalizing marijuana for medical uses should be considered.

He said he has spent up to $25,000 a year on pain medication that often is ineffective.

"I hear that one of God's plants is working to help ease the pain of multiple sclerosis," said Knollman, R-Liberty. "I know when my leg starts twitching and I hurt, I'm looking for any alternative."

Several law enforcement groups, meanwhile, said the ongoing fight against illegal methamphetamine production would be helped by requiring prescriptions to buy cold medicines with ephedrine or pseudoephedrine.

Former Vigo County Sheriff Jon Marvel testified that meth cookers have gotten around existing purchase limits on those medicines by paying others to buy for them.

"We're chasing our tails," Marvel said. "We've forced the bad guys to expand their criminal enterprise by bringing more people in buying their lawful amount of pseudoephedrine."

State police reported nearly 1,400 meth labs were seized in Indiana last year. That is up more than 70 percent since 2006 after lab seizures had declined following a new state law requiring those buying pseudoephedrine products to sign pharmacy logs and produce identification.

Supporters of electronic tracking argued requiring prescriptions would increase medicine costs and be inconvenient for sick people. They also said requiring prescriptions hasn't prevented the abuse of drugs such as the painkillers OxyContin and Vicodin.

"It doesn't seem to slow down anything else," said Sen. Michael Young, R-Indianapolis.

Some law enforcement groups don't agree on the best course of action. The Indiana Sheriffs Association favored electronic tracking, while the state police and the Indiana Prosecuting Attorneys Council support requiring prescriptions.

Under the bill, stores selling the cold medications would have to report by computer attempts to buy those cold medications and not complete the sale if the tracking system notifies them that the customer has already purchased their legal maximum.

The committee voted 9-0 to advance the electronic tracking bill, even though at least three senators on the panel said they favored tougher standards. The bill now goes to the full Senate for consideration.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • mixed messages
    Why do you mix the reporting on marijauna AND methamphetamine in the same story. They are two completely different issues. Legalizing something beneficial and natural has no place in a story on deadly, destructive methamphetamine and confuses busy readers. Don't you think?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT