IBJNews

Indiana State Museum hopes for new start

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The Indiana State Museum starts a new fiscal year Friday with a different governance structure and a $1.1 million surplus.

A new state law created the Indiana State Museum Board, which will merge operations of the museum and 11 historic sites around the state with the existing private Indiana State Museum Foundation.

CEO Tom King pushed for the new, quasi-governmental structure as a way to address high turnover in the CEO's office and a lack of fundraising, which has plagued the museum as state funding continues to decline.

The museum's 128 employees will retain state-employee benefits, but they will no longer be on the payroll of the Department of Natural Resources. The new board will have 13 members appointed by the governor and 12 appointed by the board. Bill Browne, founder of Indianapolis-based Ratio Architects Inc., will remain as board chairman.

Most of the financial surplus, about $600,000, comes from last holiday season's Titanic exhibit, which was a late addition to the museum's exhibition schedule, but drew large crowds.

"Even if most of it was due to luck, you feel like you're making progress," King said.

Most of the money will be spent paying down previous deficits, about $500,000 in 2009 and $100,000 last year, King said. The remainder will go toward a new exhibit-acquisition fund. That way, the museum can take advantage of opportunities like the Titanic exhibit as they arise, he said.

Gov. Mitch Daniels recruited King, a former president of the Eli Lilly and Co. Foundation, out of semi-retirement in January 2010 to lead a turnaround. Barry Dressel, the museum's fifth CEO since 2000, resigned abruptly in October of 2009.

King, who is no longer considered interim, said he'll stay in the post at least through the 2012 Super Bowl. "I'd like to leave here with at least a $5 million surplus," he said.

The museum has no endowment, and state funding continues to decline. In the fiscal year just ended, the state provided $8.2 million for the museum and historic sites, while the foundation earned about $3 million.

In the new fiscal year, King said state funding is about $7.6 million.

King expects to take in $1.5 million to $2 million through museum admissions, events and other "earned" revenue and another $1.5 million to $2 million in gifts and grants.

This year's exhibition schedule includes "The Endurance: Shackleton's Legendary Antarctic Expedition," which opens in October, and "Amazing Maize: The Science, History and Culture of Corn," opening in September. Shackleton is a traveling show, while museum staff created Amazing Maize.

Much of the museum's broad collection is in natural history, and that work continues. King said the museum is trying to acquire land in Posey County around the "Mann" site, a rich source of American Indian artifacts from the Hopewell era.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Doug Henning!

  2. These guy were thugs — they grew up in freaking Haughville! Smh, sigh. If the mayor needs/wants "quality" Black Hoosiers who are NOT corrupt, give me a call — I know plenty. Land bank info here - http://www.kubepharm.com/indylandbank/IndyLandBank.html

  3. Magician and illusionist!

  4. The basic idea of nice apartments with parking and retail is a good one, but this design seems overwhelmingly big/tall for Broad Ripple. The size could be disguised a bit with lots of big trees/landscaping, but the complex is too massive to blend in easily. That section of canal between College and Westfield will also need to be upgraded on both sides. Nice apartments facing onto a nice promenade with shade trees/plantings could bring together the canal towpath/Monon recreation, the outdoor seating at existing restaurants, and this project into something that upgrades the whole area. A plan for the whole stretch makes more sense than facing nice new housing onto what looks like a ditch. Is there a plan? Does the public have input? Who pays? The apartment idea seems to be reasonable, but Whole Foods is not a good idea for appropriate retail. Besides the store being physically too big, there are already Fresh Market at 54xCollege and Whole Foods in Nora for fancy groceries. Good Earth and Kroger are within walking distance of the Shell site. There are at least 7 grocery stores within a safe bike ride. Whole Foods would add nothing but traffic congestion. This design is on the right track, but there needs to be more work done to ensure that it blends in with and enhances the existing community. A project that large will set a tone for that whole part of town. It could be a real asset, but only if done right.

  5. I did not move to Zionsville to live in Carmel. This and the subsequent developments to follow will ensure a vanilla uniformity of strip malls and apartment buildings as we seek to bring our town down to the least common denominator. We were warned before recent elections that pro-development council members would make sure their friends (landowners and developers) would be able to make their millions off of the exploitation of Zionsville. Why in God's name would we sell out the best preserved small town in the State of Indiana?

ADVERTISEMENT