Indiana takes over third place in gambling revenue

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Mississippi, which has built much of its marketing for more than a decade around being the third largest gambling destination in the country, lost that title in 2009 to Indiana.

The state slipped to fourth place in terms of adjusted gross revenues from commercial gambling. In 2009, Mississippi reported $2.46 billion to Indiana's $2.58 billion. The numbers exclude charitable gambling and Native American casinos.

Mississippi casinos got roughly the same number of visitors in 2009 as they did the previous year, but people are spending less, said Beverly Martin, executive director of the Mississippi Casino Operators Association.

"The main thing was being the third largest destination gave us a great marketing tool—bragging rights, if you will," Martin said.

Convention and visitors bureaus are likely to continue touting Mississippi casinos as a reason to visit, but it won't have the same ring as being in the top three, Martin said.

Though Indiana has far fewer state-licensed casinos—13 to Mississippi's 30—it has a much larger demographic base to pull from with cities like Chicago and Indianapolis within driving distance of its properties.

Indiana had two new casinos open in 2008. And, in 2009, Penn National Gaming replaced the Argosy Casino, which opened in 1996, with a new $335 million Hollywood Casino. However, Mississippi officials believe the real reason Indiana moved up in the rankings had little to do with new casinos and more to do with outside factors affecting their competition, particularly a statewide smoking ban in Illinois.

"There's a lot more population in that part of the country," said Rep. Bobby Moak, D-Bogue Chitto, chairman of the House Gaming Committee. "I was a little bit concerned about it; looking at it, wondering what we did wrong. There was nothing in our control. There was nothing in the control of Indiana."

Indiana's reign may not last more than a year—it faces new competition from Ohio and possibly Kentucky—but industry watchers think other states, particularly Pennsylvania, may be poised to move up in the rankings.

Nevada and New Jersey continued to hold the top spots in 2009, reporting $9.76 billion and $3.9 billion, respectively. However, even their long-entrenched dominance, may be on shaky ground.

"What we're seeing is a changing of the guard now," said David Schwartz, director of the Center for Gaming Research in Las Vegas.

For about the last 10 to 15 years, there has been the Nevada, New Jersey, Mississippi hierarchy, Schwartz said. However, as the economy has gotten worse, more states have turned to gambling to fill budget gaps. The proliferation of casinos has affected the dominance of the old guard.

"People are gambling less, but they're doing it in more places," Schwartz said. "So that's why places like Las Vegas, Atlantic City and Mississippi have really been hit hard."

Every state in the country, except for Utah and Hawaii, has some sort of gambling—casinos, lotteries, pari-mutuel wagering or charitable gambling, according to the American Gaming Association.

Everyone has gambling now, said Roger Gros, publisher of Global Gaming Business Magazine.

Atlantic City has seen its market shrink by 25 percent in the last few years, Gros said. It stands to lose even more of its share now that Pennsylvania is poised to add table games to its slot-based casinos. Tunica, meanwhile, has been hurt by the Oklahoma market, which has taken people out of Texas who otherwise might have gone to northwest Mississippi.

Gambling itself is not the draw it once was to get people to these markets, Gros said.

"They're going to need a lot more than that," he said. "Non-gaming amenities has been a buzz word in the industry for the last five years, but now it's crucial."

Mississippi, particularly the Gulf Coast, needs to recreate itself now, rather than later, Gros said. That means adding the types of attractions people look for in any travel destination—restaurants, retail shops, outdoor recreation, non-casino entertainment.

Florida is looking to add commercial casinos to the Native American gambling that already exists, and that could create huge problems for the coast casinos, Gros said.

"Atlantic City didn't think about it in advance, and is now struggling to stay on top," he said. "Mississippi still has time."

Even with its fall to fourth, Mississippi remains focused on knocking the Jersey Shore from its number two spot, Moak said.

The state has a steady tax rate, a stable casino market and no restrictions on the number of casino licenses it can issue, which gives Mississippi a pro-business approach to gambling, he said.

"Mississippi says, if you have the money and you want to take a shot, come to Mississippi," Moak said. "I think that's why we'll see, even in the bad times, a little bit of growth in our market. Because the industry believes in our market."


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If what you stated is true, then this article is entirely inaccurate. "State sells bonds" is same as "State borrows money". Supposedly the company will "pay for them". But since we are paying the company, we are still paying for this road with borrowed money, even though the state has $2 billion in the bank.

  2. Andrew hit the nail on the head. AMTRAK provides terrible service and that is why the state has found a contractor to improve the service. More trips, on-time performance, better times, cleanliness and adequate or better restrooms. WI-FI and food service will also be provided. Transit from outlying areas will also be provided. I wouldn't take it the way it is but with the above services and marketing of the service,ridership will improve and more folks will explore Indy and may even want to move here.

  3. They could take the property using eminent domain and save money by not paying the church or building a soccer field and a new driveway. Ctrwd has monthly meetings open to all customers of the district. The meetings are listed and if the customers really cared that much they would show. Ctrwd works hard in every way they can to make sure the customer is put first. Overflows damage the surrounding environment and cost a lot of money every year. There have been many upgrades done through the years to help not send flow to Carmel. Even with the upgrades ctrwd cannot always keep up. I understand how a storage tank could be an eye sore, but has anyone thought to look at other lift stations or storage tanks. Most lift stations are right in the middle of neighborhoods. Some close to schools and soccer fields, and some right in back yards, or at least next to a back yard. We all have to work together to come up with a proper solution. The proposed solution by ctrwd is the best one offered so far.

  4. Fox has comments from several people that seem to have some inside information. I would refer to their website. Changed my whole opionion of this story.

  5. This place is great! I'm piggy backing and saying the Cobb salad is great. But the ribs are awesome. $6.49 for ribs and 2 sides?! They're delicious. If you work downtown, head over there.