IBJNews

City struggles to close gap on $30M in budget cuts

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis leaders made a pact to cut 5 percent from the already-adopted 2013 budget, but the reality might prove too difficult to stomach.

After weeks of presentations, city and county agencies so far have come up with $16.8 million in potential cuts, or about 60 percent of the target. Even that level of cuts would include some potentially controversial moves, such as laying off prosecutors and offering furloughs—unpaid time off—to police officers.

Ryan Vaughn, chief of staff for Indianapolis Mayor Greg Ballard, said almost every agency presented cuts that would affect personnel.

“People provide services, so you have to be very strategic about what you focus on and what you can find to outsource or eliminate," Vaughn said.

The review was part of a multi-part compromise between Ballard and the Democratic City-County Council on the $1.1 billion 2013 budget. Ballard agreed to undo a line-item veto of $32 million destined for county agencies if the council would approve tax increases and participate in the 5-percent budget cuts.

The next step is for Ballard and Council President Maggie Lewis to decide what’s acceptable. Ballard, who did not attend the presentations, hasn’t seen all the details yet, Vaughn said.

Lewis could not be reached for comment Monday morning.

Vaughn doesn’t think Ballard and Lewis will accept all of the $16.8 million in cuts that have been presented. He added, “I can’t imagine a scenario in which the council or the mayor is willing to lay off police officers.”

Not meeting the budget-cut target this year leaves the city with less cash to cover future deficits. City Controller Jeff Spalding has pegged the ongoing gap between revenue and expenses at $50 million.

Part of that has been addressed with tax hikes on car rentals and tickets to downtown sports venues. Ballard also wants the council to eliminate the homestead property-tax credit, which would free up $8 million in income-tax revenue. (The credit, which is separate from the more lucrative homestead deduction, is subsidized by income taxes.)

Other city-county councilors who sat in on the budget presentations are at a loss for answers.

“I do know this much. The public safety agencies are not going to be able to make up this budget gap,” said Councilor Mary Moriarty-Adams, chairwoman of the council’s Public Safety Committee. There’s so much interaction among the agencies that cuts in one area tend to shift burdens to others, she said.

The city has the option of raising a public-safety tax, Adams said, but she doubted there would be much support for it.

“A tax increase would be the absolute last resort,” Republican Councilor Marilyn Pfisterer said. “I keep praying that the economy will begin to rebound and next year won’t be as difficult as we fear that it might be.”

Pfisterer said she supports leaving cuts to the agencies.

“They know if they can reduce staff and still provide the services they’re required to provide,” she said.

Each year for the past five years, most mayor-controlled agencies have been required to trim 5 percent from their budgets. The exception was the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department, which is budgeted for $187 million this year.

IMPD’s presentation included furloughing civilian staff; reducing officer overtime; ending finger-printing and gun-permit services; offering sworn officers seven furlough days a year; and not allowing reserve officers to take home patrol cars.

There are hidden consequences in some of those cuts, Vaughn said. Take-home cars are a perk for reserve officers, who work 20 hours per month unpaid doing jobs like downtown patrol and managing event traffic. Taking away that perk might prompt reservists to quit, leaving the city to fill the gap with regular police, he said.

Vaughn hopes to have a spending-reduction ordinance introduced to the council in May.

The review isn’t quite finished, Vaughn said. The Marion County Sheriff’s Office and a few other agencies that didn’t approach the 5-percent mark will be asked to take a second look at their budgets.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. A Tilted Kilt at a water park themed hotel? Who planned that one? I guess the Dad's need something to do while the kids are on the water slides.

  2. Don't come down on the fair for offering drinks. This is a craft and certainly one that belongs in agriculture due to ingredients. And for those worrying about how much you can drink. I'm sure it's more to do with liability than anything else. They don't want people suing for being over served. If you want a buzz, do a little pre-drinking before you go.

  3. I don't drink but go into this "controlled area" so my friend can drink. They have their 3 drink limit and then I give my friend my 3 drink limit. How is the fair going to control this very likely situation????

  4. I feel the conditions of the alcohol sales are a bit heavy handed, but you need to realize this is the first year in quite some time that beer & wine will be sold at the fair. They're starting off slowly to get a gauge on how it will perform this year - I would assume if everything goes fine that they relax some of the limits in the next year or couple of years. That said, I think requiring the consumption of alcohol to only occur in the beer tent is a bit much. That is going to be an awkward situation for those with minors - "Honey, I'm getting a beer... Ok, sure go ahead... Alright see you in just a min- half an hour."

  5. This might be an effort on the part of the State Fair Board to manage the risk until they get a better feel for it. However, the blanket notion that alcohol should not be served at "family oriented" events is perhaps an oversimplification. and not too realistic. For 15 years, I was a volunteer at the Indianapolis Air Show, which was as family oriented an event as it gets. We sold beer donated by Monarch Beverage Company and served by licensed and trained employees of United Package Liquors who were unpaid volunteers. And where did that money go? To central Indiana children's charities, including Riley Hospital for Children! It's all about managing the risk.

ADVERTISEMENT