IBJNews

Indianapolis-area homes sales decline 10 percent

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

June home sales in the nine-county Indianapolis area dropped 10 percent when compared to June 2009, while average home prices shot up 7 percent.

According to data compiled by RE/MAX of Indiana, 2,253 homes sold in central Indiana in June 2010, a decline of 237 when compared with 2,490 in June 2009. The average home price in June 2010 was $159,142, roughly 7 percent higher than the $149,373 recorded a year earlier.

"The gain in home prices is a hopeful sign that the market is in a good position for people on the sidelines," said Dan Breault, regional director of RE/MAX of Indiana. "The stabilizing home prices, an improving economy and mortgage interest rates that remain historically low will help the housing market avoid disruptive and painful bubble-bust cycles."

The decline in home sales was attributed in part to the expiration of a sizable federal tax incentive, which required homebuyers to enter escrow by April 30.

Marion County remained the most active county in the area, despite a 6-percent drop in home sales. The county recorded 1,050 homes sold in June 2010, down 72 from 1,122 in June 2009. The average home price increased 11 percent, from $113,557 TO $125,790.

Hamilton County logged the highest average home price in the area: $253,308 for June 2010, a 7-percent increase from $236,949 a year earlier. The number of homes sold went in the opposite direction, dropping 17 percent from 529 in June 2009 to 439 in the same month this year.

Of the nine counties, only three had positive sales gains in June: Hancock (4 percent), Morgan (25 percent), and Shelby (35 percent). Boone County saw the highest average price appreciation, climbing from $228,821 in June 2009 to $264,778 in June 2010 for a 16-percent hike.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • My math must be bad
    Hamilton county's avge price was $253K and Boone county's was $264K but the story says Hamilton county had an avge higher price?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT