IBJNews

INDOT: I-69's first 65 miles may open in November

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The first 65 miles of Indiana's Interstate 69 extension from Evansville to Indianapolis are expected to open to traffic in November once contractors finish up the project's first leg, state highway officials said.

No specific opening date has been set, but contractors are working toward opening the $3 billion highway's section that will run from Evansville to the Crane Naval Surface Warfare Center south of Bloomington.

Indiana Department of Transportation project manager Brian Malone said Wednesday that some crews are working six days a week to make sure the section's bridges and interchanges are completed on schedule.

Although the highway hasn't opened yet, it's already gotten some use, The Princeton Daily Clarion reported Thursday.

Last week, a storm in eastern Gibson County downed trees and blocked portions of Indiana 57, prompting state police to travel north on I-69 to Indiana 64 to get to Oakland City. And in mid-July, a plane made an emergency landing on a portion of the highway near Washington.

INDOT officials led reporters Wednesday on a tour of a 10-mile stretch of the interstate through eastern Gibson County from Indiana 68 to the Patoka River.

INDOT spokesman Cher Elliott said a bridge in that section will be about 200 feet longer than the Golden Gate Bridge's 4,200-foot main span. She said the long bridge span is needed to protect the Patoka Wildlife Refuge.

Malone said one section of the highway north of Indiana 64 is near a former mine pit, and that site prep work there included dropping 17 tons of weight from 60 feet, seven times, to compact the soil.

Elliott said INDOT is inviting communities to plan a potential celebration in mid-October along the interstate, entertaining ideas ranging from festivals to bike rides or camp-outs.

In all, the entire project from Evansville to Indianapolis will cover 142 miles.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Viewpoint.....
    can you say the same about the property values of people's land that have lost their homes and forrests?
  • I-69
    If you need me, I'll be camping out next to the Crane off ramp celebrating the fact that Crane will be more likely to remain open and my home will not lose most if not all of it's value. Thanks Mitch Daniels, Richard Lugar, etc. for all of your hardwork and foresight on keeping Crane open and expanding.
    • What a joke!
      How soon will we see the payback from a project that was overpriced and underconstructed? Did I mention that roads don't make money? Do any of you have them on your payroll? Celebrating this is like telling someone their cancer is back and smiling.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

    2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

    3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

    4. If you only knew....

    5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

    ADVERTISEMENT