Indy airport signs new eateries, considers nixing e-cigarettes

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indianapolis Airport Authority might broaden its smoking ban to include electronic cigarettes.

The airport banned smoking in 2007 as it prepared to open a new terminal. Authority members have stood firm on their restrictive ordinance, which prohibits smoking even outside the baggage claim doors and in parking areas.

At its meeting Friday morning, the authority discussed a proposal to ban e-cigarettes, also known as vapor pens. It will be the subject of a public hearing March 21.

The authority might add to the list of personnel authorized to issue citations for smoking and do away with a schedule of escalating fees, replacing it with a $75 fine for any offense.

If the authority adopts the smoking-ban changes, they would take effect April 1.

In other action at the meeting:

• Airport concessions operator Areas USA will unload three under-performing stands: Giorgio’s in the Civic Plaza and two Cold Stone Creamery stands on post-security concourses. A new operator, OHM Concession Group, plans to open Chic-fil-A in the Giorgio’s space, a Freshens frozen yogurt stand on Concourse A and Corona Beach House on Concourse B.

OHM will invest $1.2 million and has guaranteed the airport $295,000 a year in exchange for an extended lease agreement that runs until 2025. The airport could see revenue above the minimum guarantee if the new restaurants’ sales meet OHM projections.

Brian Shapiro, president of the firm that operates Shapiro's Delicatessan in the airport, attended the meeting and asked the board to populate retail spaces with more local vendors.

Authority President Mike Wells replied that the airport needed to strike a balance between local and outside options. Traffic at the airport isn't as robust as once projected, and local operators sometimes have cash-flow problems and other issues that make it difficult to stay in business.

"We also have to listen to our customers, to hear what they want," Wells said.

• The airport is looking to a public-private partnership to help lower the cost of storm-water management.

The authority agreed to hire a transaction adviser, Rain Street Advisors LLC.  Rain Street, the firm of public-private partnership consultant Ralph McGinley, will receive 1 percent of the deal’s value, which will be determined after the financial aspects and structure of a final transaction are known, according to a memo from Executive Director Bob Duncan.

If the airport doesn’t go forward with a storm water-management project, Rain Street will receive a $50,000 break-up fee.

The airport will immediately publish a “request for expressions of interest” on the project.

• The authority considered awarding a 10-year, $1.3 million annual contract to Indianapolis-based Johnson Melloh Solutions to manage the Indianapolis Maintenance Center, the former United Airlines repair base. Members authorized airport Executive Director Bob Duncan to sign the contract, pending a few extra questions from board members.

Johnson Melloh, which also operates the airport’s Central Energy Plant, beat out four other bidders. (The losing bidders were CH2M Hill of Colorado, Maintech Acquisition LLC of New York, DTM Real Estate Services LLC of Indianapolis and GRM Facilities Management of New Jersey.)

Johnson Melloh proposed to operate the 1.7 million-square-foot IMC for $300,000 less than the current contractor. Total savings could be $550,000 a year after rebidding sub-contracts and saving money on supplies, materials and energy consumption.

• The authority OK’d bid specifications for the rehabilitation of Taxiway D, which is most often used by FedEx cargo planes. The construction project is estimated to cost $1 million to $5 million. The bidding opportunity will be advertised in March.


  • overkill
    Indy used to have a lot more flights. Now that airport looks like a ghost town many parts of the day. Maybe the real need for concessions is at the FedEx terminal since they seem to be one of the few busy parts of the airport. The new terminal looks nice but the old one would have served the city just as well.
  • Cost to fly
    Maybe the reason that "Traffic at the airport isn't as robust as once projected, and local operators sometimes have cash-flow problems and other issues that make it difficult to stay in business local eateries" is because it is less expensive (most of the time) for me to drive to Cincy for any flight/airline than to fly directly our of Indianapolis. Why is that exactly?
  • Frenzy
    Airplane fumes are more dangerous to a person's health than a whiff of cigarette smoke coming through the vents. The hysteria over smoking is out of control and unreasonable. Banning water vapor too? Please.
  • Local business
    Good for Brian Shapiro for speaking up for local business. I am always so proud to suggest to travelers that they try our local selections at the airport and believe it's so important to support our local business owners. How about putting a SpiceBox, Elbow Room or Red Lion Grog House in one of the locations? Different food and it's local!
  • Cough
    I think that IAA needs to get their own people to shot smoking on the grounds. I work in one of the offices below the concourse and oftem smell cig smoke in the restroom that comes through the vents. it is either the maintenance people or someone outside on the tarmac. And I agree, give them somewhere to smoke, they are going to do it anyway. Who wants to be the "bad guy" who has to hand out tickets?
  • Personal Liberties
    This really surprises me. Indiana was listed as one of the top states for personal liberties, then there is our airport. I am not a smoker, but I do not understand why having a designated outside area for patrons that do smoke is such an issue. Let alone a vapor e-cig. Just makes no sense!

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Kent's done a good job of putting together some good guests, intelligence and irreverence without the inane chatter of the other two shows. JMV is unlistenable, mostly because he doesn't do his homework and depends on non-sports stuff to keep HIM interested. Query and Shultz is a bit better, but lack of prep in their show certainly is evident. Sterling obviously workes harder than the other shows. We shall see if there is any way for a third signal with very little successful recent history to make it. I always say you have to give a show two years to grow into what it will become...

  2. Lafayette Square, Washington Square should be turned into office parks with office buildings, conversion, no access to the public at all. They should not be shopping malls and should be under tight security and used for professional offices instead of havens for crime. Their only useage is to do this or tear them down and replace them with high rise office parks with secured parking lots so that the crime in the areas is not allowed in. These are prime properties, but must be reused for other uses, professional office conversions with no loitering and no shopping makes sense, otherwise they have become hangouts long ago for gangs, groups of people who have no intent of spending money, and are only there for trouble and possibly crime, shoplifting, etc. I worked summers at SuperX Drugs in Lafayette Square in the 1970s and even then the shrinkage from shoplifting was 10-15 percent. No sense having shopping malls in these areas, they earn no revenue, attract crime, and are a blight on the city. All malls that are not of use should be repurposed or torn down by the city, condemned. One possibility would be to repourpose them as inside college campuses or as community centers, but then again, if the community is high crime, why bother.

  3. Straight No Chaser

  4. Seems the biggest use of TIF is for pet projects that improve Quality Of Life, allegedly, but they ignore other QOL issues that are of a more important and urgent nature. Keep it transparent and try not to get in ready, fire, Aim! mode. You do realize that business the Mayor said might be interested is probably going to want TIF too?

  5. Gary, I'm in complete agreement. The private entity should be required to pay IPL, and, if City parking meters are involved, the parking meter company. I was just pointing out how the poorly-structured parking meter deal affected the car share deal.