IBJNews

Indy firm to clean up tainted Terre Haute site

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The cleanup of a contaminated former industrial site in western Indiana is expected to begin after years of study.

Terre Haute officials this week awarded a $2.7 million contract to an Indianapolis company for the removal of soil to a depth of 10 feet on much of a 20-acre site where Terre Haute Coke and Carbon operated from 1926 until 1988.

"This is our first major step for redevelopment of the site and reclamation of the site," Pat Martin, city planner, told the Tribune-Star.

HIS Constructors Inc., which was hired for the first phase of the cleanup, had the second-lowest bid for the work, Martin said. The only lower bid did not include all the required documentation, he said.

The company's website says it is currently handling several remediation projects in Indiana and elsewhere in the Midwest.

Jim Nance, vice president of business development for HIS, said it wasn't yet clear when soil removal will begin at the Terre Haute site.

"This is our first major step for redevelopment of the site and reclamation of the site," Martin said.

City officials hope to eventually develop the site as an industrial park.

The cleanup is expected to involve the removal of at least 80,000 cubic yards of soil and to take about nine months to complete. The site is contaminated with arsenic, lead and other hazardous substances that officials said were byproducts from the production of coke, a hardened fuel formed by baking coal at high temperatures.

The city assumed ownership of the entire 52-acre property on the city's south side two years ago and officials hope it will become a commercial development area.
An additional 20-acre portion at the rear of the property, which also contains contaminants, will remain untouched until the city obtains money for future cleanup work, Martin said. Ten groundwater monitoring wells around the property have not found any of the pollutants moving from the site, he said.

The cleanup project will be paid as part of a $150 million bond issue by the city that includes money for a new $115 million wastewater treatment plant.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT