Bowl bid focuses on football safety, with Saturday at center of pitch

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

ATLANTA—Indianapolis is betting that an ambitious project to study safety issues at all levels of football, plus a plan to expand and further snazz up the Super Bowl Village, will help convince NFL owners to award the city the 2018 Super Bowl.

And organizers hope that former Indianapolis Colt Jeff Saturday and Indiana Sports Corp. CEO Allison Melangton will help deliver the final push during the city's oral presentation to get the city's bid across the goal line.

In Atlanta for the NFL team owners' meeting this week, an entourage of local sports officials revealed details late Monday morning from the city's bid for the 2018 game. An oral presentation will be delivered to owners Tuesday afternoon, along with proposals from fellow contenders Minneapolis and New Orleans.

In 2008, Indianapolis won the right to host the 2012 Super Bowl, partially on the strength of its proposed legacy project, designed to improve and leave a lasting mark on the city. The proposed legacy project in the 2018 bid would bring together several locally based sports groups to study safety in football.

The Indianapolis bid committee proposes partnering with USA Football, the NCAA, National Federation of High School Athletic Associations and the American College of Sports Medicine, all based in Indianapolis, to study and address safety issues in football at all levels. The local host committee plans to point out that concerns about safety are leading to a decline in football participation and threatening the future of the sport.

Studying and addressing concussion issues is likely to be a part of the project. The potential for permanent brain damage as a result of concussions is one of the biggest issues facing the NFL and football leagues at all levels.

"The Indiana legacy initiative is a commitment to a better and safer game of football by maximizing the sports resources only located in Indiana," said a synopsis of the bid presentation handed out to reporters Monday. "The legacy initiative answers these challenges through a partnership with USA Football and its Heads Up Football program through collaboration, innovation, funding, teaching, intellectual resources, research and facilities."

NFL insiders who asked not to be named because they were not allowed to comment on such matters said the safety study is arguably the most genius part of Indianapolis' bid.

Indianapolis' oral bid synopsis went on to say: "Our legacy project will not be a single concept, as the initiative also focuses on the important needs of the community and will support neighborhood development and residents, as well as programs that will serve our youth and others for generations to come."

In 2012, Indianapolis' Super Bowl legacy project revitalized portions of the city's near east side. Melangton promised that the 2018 project would be just as impactful, and could affect a wider array of people.

Another major element that could sway some owners' votes Tuesday is the plan to expand on Indianapolis' innovative Super Bowl Village concept.

The synopsis of the local bid handed to reporters said the Village concept in 2018 would be expanded to include Monument Circle and feature a multimedia show using advanced digital technology, laser building projections, fireworks and even more concerts than the city had for the 2012 Super Bowl.

Indianapolis' bid promises to "provide a progressive and dynamic interactive experience" that "elevates the standard for fan entertainment" at a Super Bowl.

The entourage hoping to win the 2018 Super Bowl bid for Indianapolis arrived in Atlanta in two waves, with a large chunk coming in Sunday night, and the two leaders of the effort, Melangton and Indianapolis Colts Chief Operating Officer Pete Ward, flying in Monday morning.

Many of the 32 NFL team owners, including Colts owner Jim Irsay, on Monday morning began filtering in to the Ritz-Carton in the ritzy Buckhead district of Atlanta, where they will vote Tuesday on which of three bidding cities will host the 2018 Super Bowl.

Minneapolis is building a $975 million stadium, which is considered a compelling argument for its bid. New Orleans has hosted more Super Bowls, 10, than any other city.

Unlike 2008, when Indianapolis last bid on the Super Bowl, the Circle City is not coming in as a favorite. After narrowly missing out on the 2011 Super Bowl to Dallas, many league insiders correctly predicted Indianapolis would win the 2012 game.

"This time around, Indianapolis has a steep hill to climb," said Marc Ganis, a Chicago-based sports business consultant who counts several NFL teams as clients.

Ganis thinks the owners will favor New Orleans, because the city has a solid track record of hosting the Super Bowl and the city is celebrating its tricentennial in 2018. Ganis thinks Minneapolis will be awarded the 2019 Super Bowl due to the city's commitment to build a new stadium. It's not clear, he said, where that leaves Indianapolis.

Ward isn't buying the predictions. "That's all speculation," he said.

If Indianapolis loses, it won't be because the local bid committee is not prepared. Its 900-page written bid dwarfed that of the other two cities. It was more than 700 pages thicker than Minneapolis' bid.

Although the written bids were complete, there still was some gamesmanship between the cities on Monday. While Minneapolis and New Orleans have been upfront about which two people will give their 15-minute oral presentations before the 32 team owners on Tuesday, Melangton had refused to reveal who would do so for Indianapolis until Monday.

"It's very competitive," Melangton said, explaining that she didn't want to reveal too much too early about Indianapolis' bid, giving the other bidding cities an opportunity to counter the moves.

But late morning Monday, the city revealed that Melangton, who captained the city's hosting effort in 2012, and former Colt Jeff Saturday will do the honors.

Saturday, who will go last, has become an influential figure in football, and was considered a key mover as a player representative in collective bargaining talks with owners in 2011. In addition to her work on the 2012 Super Bowl, Melangton is a respected organizer of international events, including as an associate producer for NBC during the 2012 Summer Olympics.

They will be emphasizing four key points: The committee has already raised the $30 million needed to host the 2018 Super Bowl from central Indiana's corporate community and can begin immediately focusing on hosting duties as opposed to fundraising; that Lucas Oil Stadium is one of the highest-rated NFL venues; that the Super Bowl Village concept will be greatly expanded; and that the legacy projects meet one of the league's pressing needs as well as serve the central Indiana community.

Clearly, said two NFL team executives, Melangton's experience with international events, and especially the Olympic Games, shines through in Indianapolis' bid.

After meeting with the media, Indianapolis' bid committee planned to do at least one more rehearsal of its bid. Meanwhile, Irsay and Ward no doubt will be busy with last-minute lobbying of the other 31 team owners.

After the three oral presentations Tuesday afternoon, the voting is expected to take up to two hours. On the first vote, the lowest vote-getter of the three cities will be eliminated. The other two cities will then square off in a second vote. If one of those cities doesn't get the votes of three-fourths of the owners, a third vote is taken and a simple majority rules.

Only the 32 team owners and a handful of each team's highest lieutenants are allowed in the room at the time of the voting. The voting for Super Bowl sites is the only one taken by NFL owners on a secret ballot, and lobbying and deal-making among the owners goes on until the last vote is cast.

"A lot of owners are deceptive about their voting," said Jim Steeg, a California-based sports event consultant and former NFL vice president who planned 26 Super Bowls. "It's real cloak-and-dagger stuff."

The bidding host cities, and the team owners from those cities, also have been known to sweeten the financial pot for the league at the 11th hour, as Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones did to wrestle the 2011 Super Bowl away from Indianapolis by a 17-15 vote. During the voting for that game, Jones added $23 million to his bid at the last minute and promised the venue would seat 100,000.

In addition to Melangton and Ward, Indianapolis' bid committee in Atlanta includes Eli Lilly and Co. Vice President Dave Lewis, Langham Logistics President Cathy Langham, Ernst & Young Managing Partner Derrick Burks, Innovative Edit owner Conrad Piccirillo, Visit Indy CEO Leonard Hoops, Browning Investments Chairman Michael Browning, the mayor's chief of staff Ryan Vaughn, Exact Target CEO Scott Dorsey, Lucas Oil Stadium Director Mike Fox, ISC Senior Vice President Susan Baughman, Bingham Greenebaum Doll partner Rafael Sanchez, and Lingner Production Group owner Terry Lingner.


  • Not gonna happen
    New Orleans has never lost a bid. Minneapolis is in the same position as Indy was the last go around: brand new stadium plus it has mass transit and other downtown amenities we lack. We should rest on our laurels and the success of 2012. The weather gods are very unlikely to favor us like that again even if we were to somehow be selected.
  • LOS Was First
    Must correct iuhoosier1992..... Lucas Oil opened a year ahead of that thing in Arlington, which was the scandal of it all: Jerry Jones influencing the other owners to move him ahead of Indy even tho his stadium was a year behind Lucas. His hurry to host cost him dearly, tho, given the freakish winter weather Dallas 'enjoyed' that year.
  • NOLA
    Why would the NFL choose New Orleans? The Super Bowl does not want to take "second billing" to the city's tri-centennial and they have proven true lack of attention to detail with the "black out" during the game in 2013. Minneapolis is the front runner. With a new stadium they will get the 2018 Super Bowl. That's why their presentation is 700 pages lighter than the Indy booklet.
  • I'm just saying...
    It's the 13th paragraph.I'm just saying...
  • No More Disasters
    New Orleans has hosted too many times and has a serious crime and dilapidated areas problem. Minneapolis is a great area with a new stadium and a good possibility of -20 temperatures. With Indianapolis, the NFL gets a top notch locale to host with a proven record. Go for it.
  • New Orleans
    I believe NOLA has the inside track with it being their tri-centennial. That is a big deal. Also, if Minnesota doesn't get it, I think they will get the 2019 due to the NFL traditionally giving a new stadium a SB soon after completion. That is what happen with the 2012 Super Bowl. If you remember, Indy was going after the 2011 SB, but was given to Dallas because their stadium opened prior to LOS. The owners pretty much voted right away to give Indy the 2012.
    • Clearly Italiano does not understand how much the City, the neighborhoods and the State got out of the 2012 Superbowl. It was a great success for all involved. This could be an incredible week for Indiana sports.
    • Ca-Ching
      And the tax dollars will pour out of the city to help the rich. Shame the people don't have a say in this. We lost money last time, but hopefully the other owners will reject a bid the _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Irsay
    • So Exciting..but
      Loved the article and this is a very exciting time for Indianapolis! Fingers crossed we get the bid! However, there is a typo in the 12th paragraph; you are missing the "p" in experience, just trying to help!

      Post a comment to this story

      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. So as I read this the one question that continues to come to me to ask is. Didn't Indiana only have a couple of exchanges for people to opt into which were very high because we really didn't want to expect the plan. So was this study done during that time and if so then I can understand these numbers. I also understand that we have now opened up for more options for hoosiers to choose from. Please correct if I'm wrong and if I'm not why was this not part of the story so that true overview could be taken away and not just parts of it to continue this negative tone against the ACA. I look forward to the clarity.

      2. It's really very simple. All forms of transportation are subsidized. All of them. Your tax money already goes toward every single form of transportation in the state. It is not a bad thing to put tax money toward mass transit. The state spends over 1,000,000,000 (yes billion) on roadway expansions and maintenance every single year. If you want to cry foul over anything cry foul over the overbuilding of highways which only serve people who can afford their own automobile.

      3. So instead of subsidizing a project with a market-driven scope, you suggest we subsidize a project that is way out of line with anything that can be economically sustainable just so we can have a better-looking skyline?

      4. Downtowner, if Cummins isn't getting expedited permitting and tax breaks to "do what they do", then I'd be happy with letting the market decide. But that isn't the case, is it?

      5. Patty, this commuter line provides a way for workers (willing to work lower wages) to get from Marion county to Hamilton county. These people are running your restaurants, hotels, hospitals, and retail stores. I don't see a lot of residents of Carmel working these jobs.