IBJNews

INSIDE DISH: Great Divide bridges Lockerbie past, present

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Inside Dish

Welcome back to IBJ’s video feature “Inside Dish: The Business of Running Restaurants.”

Our subject this week is Ralph’s Great Divide, which in its way is just as much a mainstay of downtown’s Lockerbie neighborhood as the pristinely restored mid-19th century homes in the historic district. The structure has roots in pre-Civil War Indianapolis, and the Great Divide carved out a niche for itself as a neighborhood watering hole in the 1980s while the area around it transformed from blighted to beautiful.



“The liquor license has been here since prohibition was repealed, and my family are the third owners since approximately 1930,” said David Brooks, 55, who shares a majority stake in the business with siblings Lee Anne Brooks, 55, and Roger Brooks, 59.

Ralph’s consists of two attached buildings with differing histories. The easternmost half with the gabled roof is believed to have been constructed around 1860, using lumber milled on site. It likely was a carriage service shop, and later became an auto repair station. The west end of the building was attached about the turn of the 1900s, and following prohibition became a neighborhood pub called Shifferdecker & Shifferdecker, after the two brothers who owned and operated it. It later was purchased by Bob Condon, who ran the watering hole as Condon’s Corner.

In the early 1980s, former pharmaceutical salesman Ralph Brooks found himself looking for work near retirement age after a corporate merger scuttled his latest job in the restaurant-supply industry. So, he gathered his family and started looking for a suitable restaurant property to buy.

After scoping some 30 spaces, they decided on Condon’s Corner. The family paid about $70,000 for the business and real estate, which included the mostly unused auto-repair section of the combined building. The Great Divide opened in 1983 as a tavern of sorts, incorporating both structures.

“We did a little bit of food business, but it by and large was still bar-driven,” said David Brooks, who started working full time there in 1986. “We had an oven and a crock pot when my father was alive.”

Ralph Brooks died at the age of 69 after a massive heart attack in late 1994. With full-time managerial duties passing to David, he took the opportunity to renovate the space and beef up the menu offerings to include steak, chops, chicken, fish and an array of appetizers. Creating and outfitting a larger kitchen ran about $15,000.

The family also took on a handful of minority shareholders who essentially supplied sweat equity and needed expertise.

“David had many visions for the business and what it could do, but it was going to take inertia and energy,” said Lee Anne Brooks, who runs her own contract sales business and handles payroll for the Great Divide. “We added a nice complement of folks who helped move the restaurant into a whole new generation.”

Annual sales jumped from $140,000 in 1994 to a range of $450,000 to $500,000 in the early 2000s, according to the family. The owners saw the recession coming in the mid-2000s, as regular customers dropped by less frequently. Gross sales in 2009 totaled $278,000, and grew to $300,000 in 2010.

The restaurant remains profitable, thanks in part to extreme penny-pinching, discounted specials and the owners’ do-it-yourself attitude. But the black ink is regularly threatened by the cost of maintenance to equipment and the historic structure.

For example, reshingling the flat roof of the building’s western section earlier this year ran about $5,000, and replacing the water-damaged ceiling of the interior (work the family essentially did itself) cost $1,000.

Making matters more complicated, any exterior work to the Great Divide must be weighed and approved by the Indianapolis Historic Preservation Commission to make sure changes harmonize with the historic character of the neighborhood and are appropriate for the structure. The owners are bracing for the approval process next spring, when they’re planning a renovation project to shore up the northern face of the building, which is noticeably bowing out.

In the video at top, Lee Anne and David Brooks recount the history of the Great Divide and its conversion from bar to a restaurant with an identity crisis. In the video below, they discuss the decision to take on minority shareholders and why they have chosen to remain closed on weekends when other eateries in the area have embraced downtown's burgeoning nightlife. 

.
 

x
x
x
Ralph's Great Divide
x
743 E. New York St.
x
(317) 637-2192
x
x
www.ralphsgreatdivide.com
x
x
x
Concept: Lockerbie neighborhood bar and grill in a building with one section constructed before the Civil War, and the other around 1900.
x
Founded: 1983
x
Owners: Siblings Lee Anne Brooks, David Brooks and Roger Brooks, plus several minority owners.
x
Purchase price: About $70,000 in 1983 for the business and real estate.
x
Gross sales: $278,000 (2009); $300,000 (2010).
x
Employees: 10
x
Seating: 50 at tables; 12 at bar; and 12 in outside beergarden.
x
Goals: To renovate the northern face of the building, which is bowing out slightly; to market the restaurant's homemade salad dressings, ham products and desserts.
x
Good to know: The restaurant is only open to the public Monday through Friday, although it is available for special events on weekends and temporarily opens during Colts games. It also has integrated music into its offerings with live piano karaoke on Monday and Friday evenings.
x
x
x


 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Divide
    Ok Mayor Ballard, You are just bitter because they wouldn't comp your lunch!
  • GREAT PLACE
    This is one of my favorite restaurants in town. You have to try the pea salad and the coconut cream pie!!!
  • It's Not JUST The Economy...
    I am no longer a customer at Ralph's Great Divide and the reason is not at all [solely] due to a poor economy and this consumer's reduced disposable income. I venture to guess that my sentiments would be echoed by many of the non-returning diners. The truth is that consistently offered high value for the price charged will bring returning business every time. My last several visits to Ralph's were distressing in that the place was clearly trading on a reputation that was no longer deserved. From my uncomfortable seat, I would wait for my food order and peer around the place. It needs a complete, thorough cleaning from the ceiling to the floor. Light fixtures included. Wash your front door window glass- it is always dirty every time I have visited and even now when I drive on by. The menu additions often do not taste "fresh" [if they have taste] and some of the food features a mysterious "frozen" flavor. During my final few visits even the food servers seemed highly disinterested in the entire event. I don't say this to be mean or nasty but when I read that the owners blame their serious business downturn on the economy I must speak up. It's just not "the economy"; too many past-their-prime enterprises too often employ that tired and easy excuse instead of being honest about their own part in a value decline. Owners and/or managers are often the culprits as to why their enterprises are past-their-prime. I am no longer there because an aged, unkept, dirty, smelly restaurant offers me and my dining dollars little reason to return. Maybe "Kitchen Nightmares" and Chef Ramsey should be called upon to help save the place...it could again be a great jewel for Lockerbie and the Near East End.
  • Create an Identity
    I could identify with a bowl of Hot Pot Aug and a bourbon ham sandwich right now! Love the Great Divide!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT