IBJNews

Hilbert in-law's life insurance dispute takes odd turn

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Local businessman J.B. Carlson contends the $15 million life insurance policy he took out on Stephen Hilbert’s mother-in-law was legitimate, because she served on his firm’s board and was a key decision-maker.

The mother-in-law, Germaine “Suzy” Tomlinson, died at age 74 last September—just 32 months after the policy was issued. As a result, Carmel-based Carlson Media Group says it’s entitled to cash in the so-called “key man” insurance policy for a hefty payday.

But the firm is a long way from receiving a check. The issuer of the policy, Houston-based American General Insurance Co., filed a federal lawsuit in December charging the coverage is invalid because J.B. Carlson misled the firm on the insurance application.

Meanwhile, the Indiana Department of Insurance confirms it’s investigating, and Hilbert’s wife, Tomisue, is preparing her own legal assault, arguing that she and her siblings are entitled to the insurance windfall.

The brouhaha surrounds what American General contends was not a “key man” policy at all, but rather a controversial form of coverage known as “Stranger Originated Life Insurance,” or STOLI, that effectively allows outside investors to wager on when an insured person will die.

In a typical transaction, an investor entices someone, usually a senior citizen, to take out a multimillion-dollar life insurance policy. Investors pay the premium and purchase the policy, making them beneficiaries. In return, the insured person receives an upfront cut of the eventual death payout.

Under the arrangement, the sooner the insured person dies, the better the return for investors. Because of that perverse incentive, states have moved to ban new policies. Indiana did so last year.

But that’s not the kind of insurance at issue in Tomlinson’s case, according to Kevin Toner, a Baker & Daniels partner representing Carlson Media Group, a privately owned marketing firm with about a dozen employees.

In a counterclaim filed in May, the firm said Tomlinson began attending the company’s board meetings in November 2002 and eventually served as vice chairwoman. The policy is straightforward key-man coverage that American General should stand behind, Toner said.

“If executives in this town find out insurers aren’t going to honor key-man insurance, I think they’re going to be quite distressed,” he said.

Tomlinson’s paid obituary printed in The Indianapolis Star made no mention of her involvement with Carlson Media Group. It said she was born in Paris and worked as a model before marrying an American soldier and moving to the United States in 1960.

During the 1970s and 1980s, the obituary said, she operated furniture and antique stores. Tomisue is one of her six children.

Steve Hilbert, a Conseco Inc. co-founder who now runs MH Equity Investors, told IBJ in January that he knew nothing of his mother-in-law’s $15 million policy before the newspaper told him about the lawsuit. He said the policy’s existence had fanned his and his wife’s suspicions that there was foul play in Tomlinson’s death.

Shortly after Tomlinson’s death, the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department ruled it an accidental bathtub drowning. The department has not reopened the investigation.

The Hilberts did not respond to requests for comment this month.

Probate court records show that Tomisue, who was named personal representative of the estate last month, is preparing to fight Carlson for the insurance money.

Because Tomlinson died without a will, her biological heirs would be entitled to any remaining assets in her estate. Tomisue last month filed to intervene in the American General case, arguing the insurer issued the coverage for the purposes of estate planning. She contends that even though she and her siblings weren’t involved in creating the policy or paying its premiums, they’re entitled to the proceeds.

In a written statement, Judy Woods, a Bose McKinney & Evans partner representing Tomisue, said: “As personal representative of her deceased mother’s estate, Mrs. Hilbert has a duty to investigate and collect any possible estate assets and make sure all assets are distributed appropriately.

“Mrs. Hilbert sought leave to intervene in the litigation involving the American General Life Insurance policy on her mother for that reason, and because there is evidence that Mrs. Hilbert was among the intended beneficiaries.”

Purchasing policy

J.B. Carlson did not respond to requests for comment.

Marion Circuit Court records show that in August 2007 he legally changed his name from Jason Carl Bolf. The reason for the change is unclear. His attorney, Toner, said: “I don’t think it has anything to do with the case, frankly.”

In court records, Carlson Media Group said its purchase of the Tomlinson policy was a board decision reached in late 2005. The policy’s annual premiums were $387,274. The company’s court filings also note that Tomlinson occasionally borrowed funds from Carlson Media Group from 2004 to 2008, although they don’t specify how much.

American General contends the court should void the policy because Carlson committed fraud in the insurance application by making it appear the coverage was solely for the benefit of Tomlinson and her family.

In fact, according to the lawsuit, the policy was a STOLI. It alleges Carlson and other defendants induced Tomlinson to take out the policy with the intention of selling it to other investors. The other defendants are Nevada-based insurance broker Geoffrey A. Vanderpal, and Michele Harra of Delaware and Delaware-based Wilmington Trust Co.

The Indiana Department of Insurance is investigating “all aspects” of the complex transaction, said Nikolas P. Mann, chief of investigations in its enforcement division and consumer protection unit. He would not comment in detail.

Legal tangle

Tomlinson’s biological heirs don’t appear to have a clear path to collecting the $15 million, said Marty Wood, vice president of the Insurance Institute of Indiana. He said that if the court finds the policy valid, American General would have to pay Carlson. But if it voids the coverage, no one would get anything.

Still, it’s impossible to be certain, Wood said, because this area of the law has rarely been explored.

“Life insurance is fairly simple,” Wood said. “But STOLI obviously makes it much more complicated.”

Carlson’s assertion that the policy is key-man coverage may be a stretch, said Joseph Belth, a retired Indiana University insurance professor who publishes The Insurance Forum, a watchdog newsletter.

Insurers typically make potential life insurance payouts commensurate with the financial value of the person they insure. He said board service usually wouldn’t be enough to prove an employee was worth $15 million to the company.

The sum is whopping compared with what directors typically earn, even at publicly traded Hoosier firms. Average compensation for a public company director in Indiana last year was $100,016, according to IBJ research.

“That’s nonsense that there would be a justification for $15 million,” Belth said. “And what’s estate planning got to do with insurable [business] interest? It’s a very confusing situation.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT