IBJNews

Insurance mandate lacks teeth, WellPoint CFO says

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

As constitutional challenges to the health reform law’s mandate to buy insurance advance, WellPoint Inc.’s chief financial officer reiterated that the company does not object to the mandate, just to its modest penalties.

Wayne DeVeydt, speaking Friday at the Columbia Club downtown, praised the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 for its success at extending insurance coverage to more people, as well as acknowledging that his industry makes itself “an easy villain” for politicians.

But he also criticized the law for further hiking the cost of health care and health insurance.

The chief target of DeVeydt’s opprobrium was the law’s combination of requiring insurance companies to take all comers—regardless of health status—while fining individuals what he described as small amounts for failing to buy coverage.

“I would like to buy life insurance the moment I’m about to die,” said DeVeydt, who has been CFO for Indianapolis-based WellPoint since 2007.

That’s what he expects many Americans to do with health insurance once they are required to buy coverage in 2014. They will not buy it until they have a major illness for which they need treatment.

By 2016, the health reform law will ramp up fines on individuals without health insurance to $695 per year or $2,085 for families. However, the fines could run as high as $12,000 per year for those making between $100,000 and $500,000 per year, according to an analysis by the Congressional Research Service.

The average family policy costs $15,000, according to the California-based Kaiser Family Foundation.

Until fines get a lot closer to the price of health insurance, DeVeydt said, many people won’t buy coverage—especially the young and healthy, whose unused premiums offset the high cost of care for older patients.

“Would you ever feed the meter if feeding the meter costs more than the [parking] ticket?” DeVeydt said in another analogy. “People say that’s not going happen. It is going to happen.”

Still, DeVeydt said the individual mandate is necessary to achieve a goal of universal health insurance. Currently, about 84 percent of Americans are covered by some form of health insurance, either public or private.

“If you really want to cover everybody, you really have to have it,” he said.

In September, a federal appeals court in Atlanta ruled that the mandate was unconstitutional, differing from an earlier decision by an appeals court in Cincinnati that upheld the law.

The cases are likely to be considered by the U.S. Supreme Court, perhaps as early as next spring.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • fact checking
    "However, the fines could run as high as $12,000 per year for those making more than $100,000 per year, according to an analysis by the National Association of Health Underwriters."

    First, the analysis you cite was not done by the National Association of Health Underwriters. It was done by the Congressional Research Service.

    Second, you misinterpreted page 15 of the CRS report. A household making $100,000 only has to pay a fine of $2,085. A household making $500,000 would pay a fine up to $12,000.
    • Why Obamacare Is Wrong for America
      Obama and the Democratic party have taken a sledge hammer to solve a problem faced by only approximately 15M people (not 50M that Democrats claim). Obamacare will increase Indiana Medicaid rolls by 500K (Healthy Indiana Plan -HIP eliminated , it will create 159 new programs/agencies (with HHS the new national insurance rate reviewer/regulator unable to communicate/coordinate,51-80% of current insured Americans will LOSE coverage,another 80M will be forced to change coverage, child only policy have atopped being sold since Obamcare passed, and it will vastly reduce low wage job at a time of 9.1% unemployment for the past 3 years at a time of massive deficits, and stagflation, not to mention the political waiver favors passed out by Obama from his own law, not to mention 80/85% Medical Loss Ratio regs, but I can still see Mickey maurer standing at the Irsay Barn handing out Obama lit to voters in 11/08. Thanks Mickey Maurer, but we need the $35M you gave to IU-B-Law to pay for your beloved Obamacare to assuage your guilt for being super wealthy, problem is it has not, will not and will never work. We need to have a pro-market not a pro-regulation reform where everybody has "a lot of skin ($) in the game" (their own money) not "free care" (Medicare/Medicaid/Employer subsidized ). See Harvard Business School Prof. Christianson's www.innovatorsprescription.com for a solution.

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. Kent's done a good job of putting together some good guests, intelligence and irreverence without the inane chatter of the other two shows. JMV is unlistenable, mostly because he doesn't do his homework and depends on non-sports stuff to keep HIM interested. Query and Shultz is a bit better, but lack of prep in their show certainly is evident. Sterling obviously workes harder than the other shows. We shall see if there is any way for a third signal with very little successful recent history to make it. I always say you have to give a show two years to grow into what it will become...

      2. Lafayette Square, Washington Square should be turned into office parks with office buildings, conversion, no access to the public at all. They should not be shopping malls and should be under tight security and used for professional offices instead of havens for crime. Their only useage is to do this or tear them down and replace them with high rise office parks with secured parking lots so that the crime in the areas is not allowed in. These are prime properties, but must be reused for other uses, professional office conversions with no loitering and no shopping makes sense, otherwise they have become hangouts long ago for gangs, groups of people who have no intent of spending money, and are only there for trouble and possibly crime, shoplifting, etc. I worked summers at SuperX Drugs in Lafayette Square in the 1970s and even then the shrinkage from shoplifting was 10-15 percent. No sense having shopping malls in these areas, they earn no revenue, attract crime, and are a blight on the city. All malls that are not of use should be repurposed or torn down by the city, condemned. One possibility would be to repourpose them as inside college campuses or as community centers, but then again, if the community is high crime, why bother.

      3. Straight No Chaser

      4. Seems the biggest use of TIF is for pet projects that improve Quality Of Life, allegedly, but they ignore other QOL issues that are of a more important and urgent nature. Keep it transparent and try not to get in ready, fire, Aim! mode. You do realize that business the Mayor said might be interested is probably going to want TIF too?

      5. Gary, I'm in complete agreement. The private entity should be required to pay IPL, and, if City parking meters are involved, the parking meter company. I was just pointing out how the poorly-structured parking meter deal affected the car share deal.

      ADVERTISEMENT