IBJNews

Insurance mandate lacks teeth, WellPoint CFO says

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

As constitutional challenges to the health reform law’s mandate to buy insurance advance, WellPoint Inc.’s chief financial officer reiterated that the company does not object to the mandate, just to its modest penalties.

Wayne DeVeydt, speaking Friday at the Columbia Club downtown, praised the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 for its success at extending insurance coverage to more people, as well as acknowledging that his industry makes itself “an easy villain” for politicians.

But he also criticized the law for further hiking the cost of health care and health insurance.

The chief target of DeVeydt’s opprobrium was the law’s combination of requiring insurance companies to take all comers—regardless of health status—while fining individuals what he described as small amounts for failing to buy coverage.

“I would like to buy life insurance the moment I’m about to die,” said DeVeydt, who has been CFO for Indianapolis-based WellPoint since 2007.

That’s what he expects many Americans to do with health insurance once they are required to buy coverage in 2014. They will not buy it until they have a major illness for which they need treatment.

By 2016, the health reform law will ramp up fines on individuals without health insurance to $695 per year or $2,085 for families. However, the fines could run as high as $12,000 per year for those making between $100,000 and $500,000 per year, according to an analysis by the Congressional Research Service.

The average family policy costs $15,000, according to the California-based Kaiser Family Foundation.

Until fines get a lot closer to the price of health insurance, DeVeydt said, many people won’t buy coverage—especially the young and healthy, whose unused premiums offset the high cost of care for older patients.

“Would you ever feed the meter if feeding the meter costs more than the [parking] ticket?” DeVeydt said in another analogy. “People say that’s not going happen. It is going to happen.”

Still, DeVeydt said the individual mandate is necessary to achieve a goal of universal health insurance. Currently, about 84 percent of Americans are covered by some form of health insurance, either public or private.

“If you really want to cover everybody, you really have to have it,” he said.

In September, a federal appeals court in Atlanta ruled that the mandate was unconstitutional, differing from an earlier decision by an appeals court in Cincinnati that upheld the law.

The cases are likely to be considered by the U.S. Supreme Court, perhaps as early as next spring.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • fact checking
    "However, the fines could run as high as $12,000 per year for those making more than $100,000 per year, according to an analysis by the National Association of Health Underwriters."

    First, the analysis you cite was not done by the National Association of Health Underwriters. It was done by the Congressional Research Service.

    Second, you misinterpreted page 15 of the CRS report. A household making $100,000 only has to pay a fine of $2,085. A household making $500,000 would pay a fine up to $12,000.
    • Why Obamacare Is Wrong for America
      Obama and the Democratic party have taken a sledge hammer to solve a problem faced by only approximately 15M people (not 50M that Democrats claim). Obamacare will increase Indiana Medicaid rolls by 500K (Healthy Indiana Plan -HIP eliminated , it will create 159 new programs/agencies (with HHS the new national insurance rate reviewer/regulator unable to communicate/coordinate,51-80% of current insured Americans will LOSE coverage,another 80M will be forced to change coverage, child only policy have atopped being sold since Obamcare passed, and it will vastly reduce low wage job at a time of 9.1% unemployment for the past 3 years at a time of massive deficits, and stagflation, not to mention the political waiver favors passed out by Obama from his own law, not to mention 80/85% Medical Loss Ratio regs, but I can still see Mickey maurer standing at the Irsay Barn handing out Obama lit to voters in 11/08. Thanks Mickey Maurer, but we need the $35M you gave to IU-B-Law to pay for your beloved Obamacare to assuage your guilt for being super wealthy, problem is it has not, will not and will never work. We need to have a pro-market not a pro-regulation reform where everybody has "a lot of skin ($) in the game" (their own money) not "free care" (Medicare/Medicaid/Employer subsidized ). See Harvard Business School Prof. Christianson's www.innovatorsprescription.com for a solution.

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

      2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

      3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

      4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

      5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.

      ADVERTISEMENT