IBJNews

Insurers warn of problems with federal regulator

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

President Obama's latest push for a health care overhaul could drive health plans around the country into insolvency, according to an insurance trade group.

A plan released Monday by the White House would give the federal government the power to regulate health insurers like a public utility. The Health and Human Services Department — in conjunction with state authorities — would be able to deny substantial premium increases, limit them or demand rebates for consumers.

But the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association warned against separating premium reviews from the responsibility of state regulators to make certain that health insurers have enough money to pay claims. A separation like that could lead to "multi-plan insolvencies," the association said in a statement.

"The risks of such a proposal — namely undermining the security and stability of Americans' health insurance — must not be ignored," the statement said.

Indianapolis-based health insurance giant WellPoint Inc. also warned about "significant solvency risks" from a federal rate-approval system. The insurer said in a separate statement that additional regulation also would do nothing to address "soaring medical costs," which are the main reason behind rate increases.

Insurers have endured waves of criticism over big premium hikes in individual insurance markets since WellPoint's Anthem Blue Cross said earlier this month it needed to raise rates in California by as much as 39 percent.

Large premium hikes or requests for them also have been reported in Maine, Oregon and Michigan, among other states. The Obama administration has pointed to these hikes — and billion-dollar profits the industry collected last year — as proof of the need for health care reform.

WellPoint said it lost millions last year on individual insurance in California. The insurer said a tough economy is forcing more healthy people to drop their individual insurance. That leaves a higher concentration of sick people who generate medical claims in their risk pools.

Insurers say these problems — not a push for profit — are the main reasons behind cost increases. Insurers and analysts say companies cannot subsidize their money-losing segments with premiums from other parts of their business.

Federal regulation of rate increases could hamper health insurers, said Edward Jones analyst Steve Shubitz. He noted that WellPoint already has said it lost millions and could be hurt if forced to lower premium increases.

"You can't run a business losing money year after year," he said.

But BMO Capital Markets analyst Dave Shove noted that a federal rate review would include an actuary who monitors insurer financial health. He doubts the proposed regulation would push any health plans into insolvency.

But he also said many details remain to be resolved, and a federal regulator might motivate insurers to stop selling individual policies in some markets.

"That is a a very real possibility," he said. "You probably will reduce choice for consumers."

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT