Interactive Intelligence rallies as investments start to pay off

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The investments Interactive Intelligence Inc. made in cloud-based services started to pay off in 2013.

The company’s profits were still slim, at $9.5 million for the year and $3.5 million in the fourth quarter, the Indianapolis software firm reported Wednesday.

But that was up from just $906,000 in profit in 2012, despite growing sales that year. The company has been going through the pains of changing its business model to focus more on the cloud, which meant pumped-up budgets for research, development, sales and marketing.

Setting up on-site call centers historically produced most of Interactive’s sales. Shifting services onto the cloud meant collecting smaller, recurring revenue over longer periods of time instead of larger, upfront lump payments.

It also meant declining earnings -- the company reported nearly $15 million in profit in 2010 and 2011 as it came out of the recession. It hit an earnings peak of 17.5 million in 2007.

Interactive ended 2013 with $318.2 million in revenue, up 34 percent from $237.4 million in 2012.

Recurring revenue accounted for 46 percent of sales, and that's expected to top 50 percent in 2014, CEO Don Brown told investors during a conference call after markets closed Wednesday. Cloud-based orders are expected to reach up to 60 percent of orders in 2014.

Total revenue should be between $365 million and $370 million for the year, he said.

Stock prices for the company rocketed in 2013, even compared to a surge in the entire stock market.

Interactive shares almost doubled from $34.36 to $67.36 over the year. The stock jumped more than 10 percent in after-hours trading Wednesday, to $76 per share, after falling 2.4 percent during regular trading earlier in the day.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing