Investors brace for ITT's plan to survive new regulations

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

How bad is it going to get?

That’s the question investors will be asking when ITT Educational Services Inc. announces its third-quarter financial results Thursday.

The Carmel-based for-profit educator stands to suffer a bigger impact than its peers from new regulations proposed by the U.S. Department of Education. Those new rules have already forced the industry’s largest player to slash its forecasts.

Phoenix-based Apollo Group Inc., operator of the University of Phoenix, said last week that new-student enrollment will drop 40 percent next quarter as the school takes steps to adjust to the government’s proposed rules, which are designed to slow down the growth of for-profit schools and boost their graduation rates.

Apollo’s Oct. 13 announcement hammered for-profit education stocks, with shares of ITT falling more than 20 percent the following day. ITT’s stock has lost one-third of its value since the federal government proposed its new rules on July 23.

Apollo’s answer to the rules has been to stop paying its admissions personnel bonuses for signing up large numbers of students and by offering a free, three-week orientation program to see if students are good prospects for graduating. Those measures will certainly lead to fewer students enrolling, the company predicted.

ITT would need to take even more drastic actions than Apollo, it would seem. That’s because Apollo is much closer to meeting the government’s proposed requirement that at least 45 percent of former students be actively paying down their loans four years after leaving a school.

If schools’ former students fail to achieve that threshold, the government would not allow a for-profit education program to get student-loan funding to raise its enrollment levels. And if repayment rates fall below 35 percent, the government would cut off student-loan funding entirely for any new students.

The Department of Education believes the repayment rates are an indication of whether students at for-profit schools graduate at all and whether the degrees they earn lead to “gainful employment.”

Apollo’s repayment rate, according to data released by the government in August, is more than 40 percent. ITT’s repayment rate is just 31 percent.

“There has been a shot across the bow of the entire industry,” said Alex Paris Jr., a for-profit education analyst at Barrington Research in Chicago. “ESI,” he added, referring to ITT by its stock ticker, “is going to be one of the most affected by proposed gainful employment regulations.”

Paris does not expect ITT managers to detail their plans for answering the government’s new rules, because they want to wait until the rules are final, which could be as early as next month. The company will release its third-quarter results before the markets open Thursday, and then hold a conference call at 11 a.m.

However, Paris said there is a chance ITT might not have to take steps quite as drastic as Apollo did. Because Apollo is the industry behemoth—needing to recruit hundreds of thousands of students each year just to sustain its enrollment of 470,000—it faces pressures that a small company like ITT does not, Paris said.

ITT currently enrolls about 80,000 students.

Paris and other analysts do expect ITT to slash its tuition costs by 25 percent to 50 percent. It will need to do this in order to comply with another part of the proposed regulations.

That part would calculate graduates’ annual payments on their student loans, then divide that figure by the annual income that gets reported to the Social Security Administration.

If that ratio is higher than 8 percent, a for-profit degree program would be restricted from growing its enrollment. If that ratio is above 12 percent, new students in that program would be ineligible for federal student loans.

Deutsche Bank analyst Paul Ginnochio estimates that ITT’s bachelor’s degree graduates are paying roughly 16 percent of their starting salaries in loan payments. ITT’s associate’s degree graduates are paying just under 12 percent of their incomes to repay student loans.

It’s expensive to earn a degree at ITT—about $56,000 for a bachelor’s and about $30,000 for an associate’s. On average, federal student loans cover 80 percent of those costs for ITT students. Federal loans are often the only source of financing available to ITT students, who on average are 29 years old with annual incomes of $17,000 when they enroll.

ITT has seen phenomenal growth, especially during the recent recession, as out-of-work adults flocked to its campuses to pick up new skills. That growth put ITT on a pace this year to turn a profit of $380 million, a spike of 27 percent from last year.

Paris predicts that 2011 will be a year of painful transition for ITT and its peers, with stock prices holding fairly steady at their depressed levels. But as the schools adjust to the new rules, he still expects them to be highly profitable—if slower growing—companies.

“Slower growth but more predictable growth and potentially higher margin growth because those students who persist generate higher lifetime revenue to the institution,” he said.

More coverage on the proposed rules and their impact on ITT can be found here.


  • Needed
    As a person who knows many individuals who have graduated with degrees from such institutions, I must say they are NOT diploma mills (which give you a piece of paper for literally no effort). While regulation is probably necessary to improving taxpayer benefits, successful students at these schools do work hard. Please don't discount the effort it takes to get a degree from an accredited school.
  • Bravo
    It is about time that these diploma mills had some oversite. We all know American needs more educated workers but presently the taxpayers are pumping money into these schools with LITTLE results.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

  2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

  3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

  4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

  5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.