It's time to step up

November 21, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Letters To The Editor

Tough times. It’s a phrase that we’ve been hearing and using for so many months. I wonder if it’s lost some of its meaning?

To those of us fortunate to have a job, “tough times” can stir up associations like staff cutbacks, frozen salaries, slashed bonuses and perks, unpaid leave, uncertainty about our own careers.

But for someone without a job, tough times can be even more frightening: spending what little financial cushion you might have just to get by; worries about how you’ll pay the next housing, food and utility bills; foreclosures and evictions; escalating stress and conflicts; health problems you can’t afford to treat; child care costs you can’t afford if you do get hired; being put on waiting lists at agencies who themselves are tapped out.

Tough times are real and challenging to navigate. But, if we are honest, we have to admit that those of us fortunate to have jobs have an advantage in tough times.

How can we best use that advantage? By resisting the impulse to cut back or eliminate our charitable giving at a time when needs are off the charts. It’s not too late.

There are so many lives at stake—and the organizations that work with them are depending on United Way to be successful. When we finish this campaign, will you and your company’s name be on the honor roll of those who stepped up when your community needed you most?

To step up your personal gift or your company’s campaign, write community@uwci.org or call 921-1206. If you do not work for a company that runs a United Way campaign, you can still contribute personally. Every dollar will help. Go to LiveUnitedGiveUnited.org and give.

Be courageous. Ease tough times with a helping hand for our community! Answer United Way’s call to LIVE UNITED by giving, advocating and volunteering.


Gino Santini

2009 Annual campaign chairman

United Way of Central Indiana


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing