IBJNews

ITT Educational, for-profit peers reaped $521M from military

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Twenty for-profit colleges reaped $521 million in U.S. taxpayer funds in 2010—seven times more than in 2006—by recruiting armed-services members and veterans through misleading marketing, according to a Congressional report released Thursday.

Getting the money from military personnel helped the companies circumvent a cap on the aid they can receive from the Education Department, their main source of income, according to the report from Iowa Democrat Tom Harkin, chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions committee. Congress should protect veterans and taxpayers from documented abuses by those colleges, the report’s authors said.

The Post-9/11 GI Bill, which Congress passed in 2008, raised educational benefits for almost all military veterans, and in some cases allowed them to pass money for school to spouses and children, according to the report. The colleges made it a priority to recruit military members to exploit the surge in benefits, the authors said.

“Congress may have unintentionally subjected this new generation of veterans to the worst excesses of the for-profit industry: manipulative and misleading marketing campaigns, educational programs far more expensive than comparable public or non-profit programs, and a lack of needed services,” according to the report.

The total of $521 million encompasses both veterans’ benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs and tuition assistance from the Department of Defense.

Carmel-based ITT Educational Services Inc. scored the biggest windfall, with $79.2 million in Post-9/11 GI Bill revenue. Rounding out the top five were Apollo Group Inc., operator of the University of Phoenix, with $76.9 million; Pittsburgh-based Education Management Corp. with $60.5 million; Hoffman Estates, Ill.-based Career Education Corp. with $58.2 million; and Oakbrook Terrace, Ill.-based DeVry Inc. with $47.9 million, according to the report.

Senator Thomas Carper, a Democrat from Delaware, said he asked the Government Accountability Office to investigate the Defense Department’s ability to guard against waste in its tuition-assistance program. A GAO report in August documented misleading marketing at 15 for-profit colleges.

The Defense Department “has yet to increase oversight of this education program, leaving us with no indication of whether this increased cost to the taxpayers buys our military personnel the kind of high quality education they so richly deserve,” Carper said in an e-mail.

Statistics suggest that the for-profit colleges attended by military members have high dropout rates and poor educational results, according to the report. At four of the five for-profit colleges receiving the most in Post-9/11 GI Bill funding, loan repayment rates were below 37 percent, according to the report.

At the same four schools, 24 percent of the students defaulted on their loans, according to the report. The national rate of student default on government loans was 7 percent in the academic year ended in 2008, the most recent period for which data are available, according to the Education Department. The default rate at U.S. for-profit colleges was 11.6 percent that year, the department said Sept. 13.

Harris Miller, president of the Washington-based Association of Private Sector Colleges & Universities, which represents the industry, didn’t immediately return a call to his office seeking comment.

A 2009 program created by Congress to provide tuition assistance for military spouses cost the Defense Department $250 million in less than a year, according to the report. Forty-six percent of the 136,000 spouses enrolled in the program attend for-profit colleges, according to the report. The program was redesigned with a less-generous benefits package.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Free Market?
    Why again do we believe private enterprise is the answer to improving the education system?
  • They need our help!
    see article below about why both the schools and these adults need help.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So much for Eric Holder's conversation about race. If white people have got something to say, they get sued over it. Bottom line: white people have un-freer speech than others as a consequence of the misnamed "Civil rights laws."

  2. I agree, having seen three shows, that I was less than wowed. Disappointing!!

  3. Start drilling, start fracking, and start using our own energy. Other states have enriched their citizens and nearly elminated unemployment by using these resources that are on private land. If you are against the 'low prices' of discount stores, the best way to allow shoppers more choice is to empower them with better earnings. NOT through manipulated gov mandated min wage hikes, but better jobs and higher competitive pay. This would be direct result of using our own energy resources, yet Obama knows that Americans who arent dependent of gov welfare are much less likely to vote Dem, so he looks for ways to ensure America's decline and keep its citizens dependent of gov.

  4. Say It Loud, I'm Black and Ashamed: It's too bad that with certain "black" entertainment events, it seems violence and thuggery follows and the collateral damage that it leaves behinds continues to be a strain on the city in terms of people getting hurt, killed or becoming victims of crimes and/or stretching city resources. I remember shopping in the Meadows area years ago until violence and crime ended make most of the business pack you and leave as did with Lafayette Square and Washington Square. Over the past 10 to 12 years, I remember going to the Indiana Black Expo Soul Picnic in Washington Park. Violence, gang fights and homicides ended that. My great grandmother still bears the scares on her leg from when she was trampled by a group of thugs running from gun fire from a rival gang. With hundreds of police offices downtown still multiple shootings, people getting shot downtown during Black Expo. A number of people getting shots or murdered at black clubs around the city like Club Six on the west side, The Industry downtown, Jamal Tinsley's shot out in front of the Conrad, multiple fights and shootings at the skating rinks, shootings at Circle Center Mall and shooting and robberies and car jackings at Lafayette Mall. Shootings and gang violence and the State Fair. I can go on and on and on. Now Broad Ripple. (Shaking head side to side) Say It Loud, I'm Black and I'm Ashamed.

  5. Ballard Administration. Too funny. This is the least fiscally responsive administration I have ever seen. One thing this article failed to mention, is that the Hoosier State line delivers rail cars to the Amtrak Beech Grove maintenance facility for refurbishment. That's an economic development issue. And the jobs there are high-paying. That alone is worth the City's investment.

ADVERTISEMENT