IBJNews

IU Health buying docs in hospital ventures

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indiana University Health is now quietly unwinding the physician ownership of its hospitals in Carmel and Avon—which sparked loud controversy when they opened in 2004 and 2005.

The move by IU Health, formerly known as Clarian, will remove two of the most recognizable examples of physician-owned hospitals, leaving the Indiana Orthopaedic Hospital as the only Indianapolis-area hospital that is majority-owned by physicians.

The culprit is the 2010 health care reform law, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. It stipulates that physician-owned hospitals cannot increase their total number of beds, operating rooms and procedure rooms—or if they do, they will no longer be eligible for payments under the federal Medicare program.

Since Medicare, which covers all Americans 65 and older, is the largest health plan in the nation, no health care provider can operate profitably without it.

Carmel and Avon are growing communities, and IU Health wanted to have the option of expanding its hospitals there as needs arise, said Ron Stiver, IU Health's senior vice president of engagement and external affairs.

“Nothing’s inevitable at this point, but we’d like to have that opportunity,” Stiver said. “It was a no-brainer.”

The hospital in Avon, IU Health West, was 20-percent owned by physicians. They will all be cashed out within a month, Stiver said, though he declined to disclose the details of the buyouts.

At IU Health North in Carmel, the process is just getting started to cash out the physicians, who own 36 percent of that hospital.

Both the Avon and Carmel hospitals will be converted to not-for-profit status, according to IU Health officials.

Also, IU Health had intended to sign up physician investors for its next hospital, IU Health Saxony in Fishers. But that option is now off the table.

Physicians surged into ownership of their surgery centers and even hospitals in the 1990s as a way to better control patient care—and to boost their incomes. In  Indianapolis, the Indiana Orthopaedic Hospital and the IU Health Hospital were joined by two physician-owned heart hospitals: The Indiana Heart Hospital in Castleton and the St. Vincent Heart Center in Carmel.

The physicians owners of the Indiana Heart Hospital were bought out in 2008 by Community Health Network. And St. Vincent Health, by acquiring The Care Group physician practice in 2010, has control of the St. Vincent Heart Center.

Physician-owned hospitals like the Indiana Orthopaedic Hospital have produced the best patient outcomes, but were criticized harshly for siphoning off the most lucrative patients from community hospitals, who claimed they were stuck with too many money-losing patients to turn a profit.

Those arguments finally gained traction during the 2009 debate over health care reform, and the growth restrictions made it into the final law.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Maintain Journalistic Quality
    In the interest of unbiased reporting, I suggest that the author use the word "impetus" rather than "culprit" in the paragraph three reference to the 2010 health care reform law. If avoidance of property tax was the real impetus, however, then that sentence becomes a misstatement of the facts, rather than just a biased statement.
  • Tax Exempt Yet Uninsured Sent To Governments Wishard To Keep Profits Up.
    JK,

    Whats going on between the city of Indianapolis and IU Health on converting everything to tax exempt status.

    How does that impact IU Health's expansion plans downtown and our tax base?
  • The Truth
    The reason IU Health is converting these hospitals to non-profit organization has more to due with avoiding paying property/income taxes than a obscure footnote in the healthcare bill.

    They calculated that it was far cheaper to buy these doctors out than to lose the tax exempt benefits on all the existing and new hospitals they are building or acquiring around the state.

    There tax exempt status has become an issue as they expand rapidly statewide playing a shell game with profits between their mix of for profit and tax exempt subsidiaries.

    In fact, Indianapolis is backing a $200 Million expansion of IU Health based upon the fact these new buildings would be taxed to pay back the taxpayer bonds.

    Appears IU Health had no intention of keeping its end of this deal.

    Life Sciences Project Could Mean 2,400 Jobs

    Mayor Ballard said â??This development also means remediation of brownfield sites and unsafe buildings, adding exempt properties back to the tax base, investment in public infrastructure, and investment in public safety.â??

    http://www.insideindianabusiness.com/newsitem.asp?id=44163
  • NOT just claims..
    Privately owned hospitals don't have to live up to the expectation of not for profit. They can turn away patients. AS such, the non insured are medicaid patients that don't pay the bills get siphoned to the not for profits. EMTALA law also requires NON-profits that take medicare to see ANYONE and provide stabilizing care, which makes essentially a non-funded government mandate. NO other profession or business is subject to so large a degree. As far as quality of care--when your patients can all afford their aftercare and follow up, they will have better results. Their educational levels also tend to be a higher level. So please look at all the facts before being critical of non-profit institutions.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The Fringe! Plus, the simple fact that there are so many local faves in such close proximity to each other.

  2. I remenber, watching the toll road, being built, through South Bend, when I was 10 years old. I believe, back then that it was estimated, that the toll road, would be paid for in 20 years and then it would be free. I am now 71, what happened? Since the power is in the people, by that, I mean that, we the people are in total control of everything. I, suggest that no one ever use the toll road again, let it go broke. We the people can control the price of everything, from groceries to gas, if we would just do it. If we don't pay the asking price, the sellers will lower the price and if we wait awhile, they will lower the price to what we accept as reasonable. I would like to know why a highway like interstate 94, is so well maintained, a much better highway, than the toll road, but has no tolls. I would also like to know why, a sitting governor, with a term limit, maximum of eight years, can lease, public property, for 75 years. Even though I have transponders in both of my trucks and will not be affected by the increase, I have been and will contine to avoid using the toll road. I make many trips from northern Indiana to Chicago, every year, and I prefer the better highway, I94!

  3. Coming from her background,she should be used to those kinds of advances! Menard probably figured it was ok to tuck a buck!

  4. I'm still waiting for the list of available, high quality apartments in the Village.

  5. This criminal masquerading as a lawyer obviously has serious issues. He’s been proven by his own testimony to be a pathological liar and probably has a personality disorder as he seems to be constructing a reality around himself. He places no value on truth, honesty or loyalty as evidenced by what he has done to his clients and his own family. And by the demands and lies he has made in court, it is evident he feels entitled to do and say whatever suits his purpose and everyone else is expected to nod obediently and believe him because he is, after all, Bill Super Lawyer; or BS lawyer for short. This millionaire wanna-be no longer owns anything of value; he squandered it and put everything he had into foreclosure. He has no money, house, car, boat or vacation home left to show for what he earned or what he stole. He’s just another loser without morals who will be doing time. I’m certain all of his courtroom shenanigans are antagonizing his poor victims. As Lamar said, his behavior and claims in court have been outrageous. The judge needs to be more than concerned; he needs to be judicial and end this nonsense.

ADVERTISEMENT