IBJNews

IU Foundation buys Indiana Landmarks' canalside offices

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indiana Landmarks announced Monday that it has sold its building on the Central Canal downtown to Indiana University Foundation.

The price for the 15,734-square-foot building at 340 W. Michigan St., also known as the Williamson Center, was not disclosed. The building is actually an 1874 house, which Indiana Landmarks moved in 1984 to save it from demolition. The house was later restored and enlarged to serve as the not-for-profit preservation group's headquarters.

“Indiana Landmarks wouldn’t sell to just anyone, and we’ll retain protective covenants to ensure its preservation,” President Marsh Davis said. “We’re pleased it will be in the good hands of the Indiana University Foundation.“  Proceeds from the sale will go into a restricted endowment to fund operations of the new Indiana Landmarks Center.

Indiana Landmarks Center is the former Central Avenue Methodist Church, which is undergoing a $13 million renovation that includes two theaters, reception halls, meeting rooms and offices. Indiana Landmarks will move to the location in late May, when the offices are expected to be finished.

The IU Foundation will move its Indianapolis staff from an office on North Meridian Street.

“We had been looking for a location closer to campus,” foundation President Gene Tempel said.  “This building is on the edge of campus and connected to downtown Indianapolis and the community.  It is the perfect place for the foundation as we work with the campus to raise funds for its $1.25 billion IUPUI IMPACT campaign.” Tempel said the building may eventually house university partners as well as foundation offices.  


 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. these guys only skill was to steal from other's hard earned savings.

  2. I voted for him last time and it WAS the LAST time. He needed to to quit running around the world on useless trips, and giving our $$ away to sports teams. I'll vote for anyone but Ballard next time. BTW...we gave $40M to the Pacers and cannot even watch the games on TV.

  3. For the people concerned about traffic, you should know that mixed-use projects (like the one being proposed), actually allows for and encourages more people to walk and bike, thereby mitigating additional automobile traffic. If we continue to design and build suburban-type projects in the City (i.e. automobile-oriented projects), we are not offering anything different from what the suburbs offer, which means we will continue to lose jobs/people to the suburbs. The reason Broad Ripple is somewhat successful today is that people want to live in a place that offers the convenience of being able to walk/bike to restaurants, retail, nightlife, the Monon, etc. Why would you not want to support a project that is complimentary to what already makes the area desirable? The real argument with this project should be its lack-luster design and layout, not the density.

  4. It is unfortunate that there is a perception that celebrities validate an event. The Indy 500 stands on its own, especially for those coming in from out of town. It was always so disturbing to read the gushing descriptions of Ashley Judd threaded throughout the local coverage. Very happy that era is at an end.

  5. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

ADVERTISEMENT