IU professors top Purdue's in pay after freeze ends

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana University’s men’s basketball players weren’t the only Hoosiers that had Purdue University’s number this year. So, too, did IU’s full professors, according to results of an annual faculty salary survey released Monday.

After the recession forced a freeze in its professors' pay, IU’s flagship Bloomington campus boosted its faculty salaries roughly 6 percent this year, which vaulted its top professors’ pay past Purdue’s professors after the West Lafayette campus had moved ahead in compensation the previous year.

Full professors at IU-Bloomington are pulling down average salaries of $128,400, nearly 3 percent higher than Purdue’s full professor average of $125,100.

The highest-paid full professors in the state are in South Bend, at the University of Notre Dame. The state’s only private research campus pays its top academics $150,200 per year on average.

Growth in professor pay at universities across Indiana and the nation has moderated since the 2008 financial meltdown and the slow economic recovery that has followed. But faculty salaries have still grown faster than inflation and average wages since 2000—during a time tuition costs have skyrocketed.

That has put college pay in the spotlight. Even U.S. Vice President Joe Biden noted in January that “salaries for college professors have escalated significantly. They should be good, but they have escalated significantly.”

The American Association of University Professors, which released the faculty salary data Monday, sought to counter the notion that professor pay was linked to high tuition in its report that accompanied the data, culled from 1,251 colleges and universities nationwide.

“AAUP survey data demonstrate that, contrary to a persistent myth, full-time faculty salaries are not the cause of rising tuition prices over the last three decades,” stated authors Saranna Thornton and John Curtis. They noted that faculty salaries have not kept pace with inflation the past three years and for six of the eight years before that.

That trend has also proved true at such schools as Butler University, the University of Indianapolis, Ball State University and even IUPUI, the Indianapolis campus of IU and Purdue.

But at the state’s research hubs—IU-Bloomington, Purdue-West Lafayette and Notre Dame—professor pay has galloped ahead of inflation and average wage growth.

From 200 to 2012, IU-Bloomington raised professor pay—including for lower-ranking associate and assistant professors—by a range of 48 percent to 60 percent, according to the AAUP data.

At Purdue-West Lafayette, the pay increases since 2000 have ranged from 44 percent to 54 percent.

At Notre Dame, faculty pay has leaped 43 percent to 63 percent since 2000.

All three schools have been more aggressive in recruiting top-notch researchers—often trying to poach them from other universities by outbidding other schools. Such researchers often bring with them existing streams of grant funding and a team of student researchers to go with them.

"Indiana University is committed to its mission of being a leading public research university, and to do that the university must attract and retain the best and brightest faculty," IU spokesman Mark Land said Monday in an e-mail. "Even during challenging economic times such as those we have experienced over the past few years, the university's commitment to offering competitive salaries to its faculty has not wavered and will continue to be a priority in the future."

IU and Purdue have not received significant criticism for their faculty salaries specifically. But state legislators have vocally criticized the state’s top public institutions for rapidly increasing tuition over the past 20 years.

Sen. Luke Kenley, R-Noblesville, has said that IU and Purdue—in their admirable quest to increase their national and global standings—have forgotten that they’re also supposed to be affordable for Indiana citizens. And he thinks they’re missing opportunities—created by new technologies—to dramatically lower their costs.

“So that means that they just intend to keep raising tuition at such an incredible rate? I think they’re going to do it on the backs of the citizens,” Kenley said in an interview last year. “If that’s their plan, then we have a fundamental disagreement about what their mission is."


  • Fairness
    Econ professors are welcome to go pursue those options if they want. Most, if not all of them prefer the academic life for many reasons, and I'm not convinced that they could all be even richer in the private sector. The point is, those who do the same kind of work in the same organization should make similar salaries. Do I really have to go to Cuba to find fairness? Is that what the US stands for: just take your lumps and don't complain, because it could be worse somewhere else?
  • Econ Professors
    Not to knock English professors, but I remember taking a graduate level econ course and the professor made a lot of money trading currency. Point: good econ professors have income options that English professors don't. You want the good ones, you have to pay for them. Didnt say it was fair. You want fairness go to Cuba.
    • There's more to this than meets the eye
      Had IBJ really done its homework for this article, it would have broken down faculty compensation by department and campus. Economics full professors, for example, make roughly twice the salaries of English full professors--and that is without spending the 10 to 20 hours per week grading papers that English instructors do.
    • IUPUI
      Amen, Gary. Our faculty raises at IUPUI--at least in Liberal Arts--have ranged from zero to 3% over the past decade, but IUPUI is a major research and teaching and service university serving the capital city. We also have many full-time lecturers who make in the $30,000-$40,000 range, and many adjunct (part-time) faculty who make about $2200 per course with no benefits.
      • IUPUI
        IUPUI is NOT a satellite campus, as this article states. IUPUI is a full fledged research campus with over 30,000 students that generates more external funding and research than either the IU Bloomington or Purdue West Lafayette campuses.

        Post a comment to this story

        We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
        You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
        Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
        No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
        We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

        Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

        Sponsored by

        facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

        Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
        Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
        Subscribe to IBJ
        1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

        2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

        3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

        4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

        5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.