IURC clears ex-judge in Duke Energy ethics scandal

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission has concluded an internal investigation into Duke Energy Corp. cases heard by a former administrative law judge for the agency who was simultaneously seeking a job with the utility.

Scott Storms “did not deviate in his rulings or decisions from commission procedure or standard practice,” the state agency said Tuesday afternoon in a prepared statement.

The scandal-plagued IURC recently reopened Storms’ cases for review after Gov. Mitch Daniels fired IURC chairman David Lott Hardy this fall for failing to pull Storms from Duke cases after learning Storms applied for a job at Duke.

Storms presided over a number of cases related to Duke’s controversial Edwardsport coal-gasification generating plant, a $3 billion project that is running more than $1 billion over original cost estimates.

While the IURC appeared to find no irregularities with Storms’ work surrounding Edwardsport, it said Tuesday it has reopened a case Storms handled in July that the Indiana Office of Utility Consumer Counselor appealed Aug. 12 before the Indiana Court of Appeals.

Storms wrote a decision last July that gave Duke the ability to seek $11.6 million in cost recovery in a future rate case for storm damages incurred during a January 2009 ice storm in southern Indiana.

As IBJ reported Oct. 16, the OUCC appealed the decision, saying such “retroactive” ratemaking to recover past, rather than future costs, is forbidden except under extraordinary circumstances.

The IURC said Tuesday that its technical staff issued a “more neutral” report than the storm damage decision written by Storms. “Although the audit of the case showed no anomalies with regard to procedure, this was the only order in the internal audit to be recently appealed to the Indiana Court of Appeals,” the commission said.

“If we find the Duke storm damage case was flawed in any way, we will not hesitate to reverse the commission’s decision,” said IURC Chairman David Atterholt, whom Daniels named to replace Hardy.

Critics of the commission for decades have complained of a revolving door between the commission and the state’s utility companies.

Disclosure of e-mails between Hardy and Storms emerged recently that raised new concerns. Hardy and Storms, in e-mails the agency recently disclosed, made light of the Indiana Ethics Commission procedures required to clear him for employment with Duke, which he accepted in September. Storms also traded e-mails with then-Duke Indiana president Mike Reed about his potential employment with the utility.

Duke put Storms and Reed on administrative leave after media disclosure of the e-mails, obtained through public records requests. Duke later fired both.  Another Duke executive, who enjoyed a chummy relationship with Hardy, stepped down or was fired from his job this week.

Meanwhile, the agency’s conduct is still being reviewed by the state’s Office of Inspector General.  The IURC acknowledged previously it had been contacted by the FBI as part of a possible federal investigation.





Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...