IBJOpinion

JONES: Hoosiers still processing change with wary eye

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

DEBATE QAre Hoosiers becoming more politically conservative or liberal?

 

Jones
AA casual glimpse of recent developments in Indiana politics might suggest Hoosiers are in the throes of an identity crisis. As a traditional dead-red state, Indiana produced few surprises. Republicans, for the most part, rule the roost, even with the occasional presence of Democratic governors or slight majority of Dems in the state’s House of Representatives.

So what are we to make of Obama’s 2008 victory in the presidential race in Indiana? Or Joe Donnelly’s capture of what should have been a safe Republican U.S. Senate seat in 2012? Or, perhaps more startling, the failure of social conservatives to obtain their coveted constitutional ban on same-sex marriage this year because of the drift in attitudes among once-reliable supporters in the Legislature?

Early in my career, a wise political mentor taught me about cycles and pendulums, and how the electorate balanced itself periodically by making adjustments at the ballot box. He said the only sure thing in politics was that the pendulum would continue to swing, and when things go badly, corrections would likely arrive with the next election.

While more pronounced on the national level, similar cycles occur in Indiana. The pendulum swings, but not far.

The shocking Obama victory in Indiana in 2008—the first time since 1964 that a Democrat had carried the state in a presidential race—is understandable if viewed in the proper light. Ditto for Donnelly’s unexpected Senate win. Even the failure of the marriage amendment reflects Hoosiers being Hoosiers rather than an impending change in attitude or ideology.

The presidential election of 2008 occurred during an economic meltdown the likes of which America had not experienced since the Great Depression. The Republican Party was largely blamed for that recession. Even traditional red states found themselves tilting—temporarily—toward the Democrats. Being a neighbor of Obama’s home state of Illinois undoubtedly contributed to Indiana’s narrow entry into the winner’s column.

In 2012, Indiana voters also re-established their independence from the red-state tag by electing Donnelly. Hoosiers almost always favor Republicans in these races, but will draw the line if they view a candidate as too extreme.

Such was the case with GOP nominee Richard Mourdock, who defeated six-term incumbent Sen. Richard Lugar in a Tea Party-fueled primary. The more moderate base of the Indiana Republican Party teamed with Democrats to opt for Donnelly, who by no stretch can be called a liberal.

Social conservatives have influence, but they don’t control the Republican Party. That was never more true than in the debate over the same-sex marriage ban amendment. The proposed amendment was changed, thereby delaying its path to implementation, because some conservative Republicans rebelled at the original language.

Society’s views toward same-sex relationships have changed. Republicans are part of this evolution in attitude.

Are Hoosiers becoming more conservative or liberal? Neither. Hoosiers are marching in place, reacting to events and trends with a wary eye, but willing to bend in the wind when the time is right.•

__________

Jones is editor of the Tribune-Star in Terre Haute and president of the Indiana Debate Commission. Send comments to ibjedit@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT