IBJNews

  • Home

Judge: Anderson can lay off firefighters

Associated Press
October 24, 2012
Keywords
Anderson, Government, Law, Legal Issues, Legislation, Local Government, Madison County, Regional News
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A Madison County judge has thrown out parts of the city of Anderson's contract with its firefighters that bars layoffs and sets minimum staffing levels.

Circuit Judge Dennis Carroll said in a 27-page ruling Tuesday said that Indiana law gives municipalities the right to lay off employees because of economic conditions. Carroll says that's a core management right that can't be bargained away.

Anderson city attorney Jason Childers says he's happy with the decision.

The Herald Bulletin said the ruling set the stage for furloughing as many as 20 firefighters and seven police officer to close a budget deficit. The Anderson City Council was expected to take up the budget later Tuesday.

A message seeking comment was left for Anderson Professional Firefighters Local 1262.

A councilman offered a plan Tuesday night making $1.3 million in alternative cuts and using most of that money to keep the police and fire department positions. The council voted unanimously to delay decisions on the budget until Monday.

Anderson Mayor Kevin Smith said he'll look at any suggestions, but that years of declining property tax revenue have left the city with few options.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Anderson
    Mark CombsOctober 24, 2012 3:37 PM
    Mayor Smith has stated that he is willing to look at other options and suggestions. And, Anderson is not dying. Mayor Smith is doing an excellent job at bringing in jobs. Get your facts straight before you post.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • Anderson
    RonOctober 24, 2012 10:57 AM
    Why would a city that has high crime rate. No jobs. Basically has nothing to offer do this. Why not lay off lazy and non productive city employees. Why not lay off some wasted city job positions.? Cut pay in most positions esp. the Mayor. Anderson is ranked at the bottom. The city is dying and this is just gonna drive more citizens away decreasing the population even more. Anderson used to be a city of 70,000 now it's below 59,000. Bad move for Anderson if it lays off police and firefighters.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    ADVANCED SEARCH
    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ

    1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

    2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

    3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

    4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

    5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

    ADVERTISEMENT