IBJNews

Judge: Anderson can lay off firefighters

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A Madison County judge has thrown out parts of the city of Anderson's contract with its firefighters that bars layoffs and sets minimum staffing levels.

Circuit Judge Dennis Carroll said in a 27-page ruling Tuesday said that Indiana law gives municipalities the right to lay off employees because of economic conditions. Carroll says that's a core management right that can't be bargained away.

Anderson city attorney Jason Childers says he's happy with the decision.

The Herald Bulletin said the ruling set the stage for furloughing as many as 20 firefighters and seven police officer to close a budget deficit. The Anderson City Council was expected to take up the budget later Tuesday.

A message seeking comment was left for Anderson Professional Firefighters Local 1262.

A councilman offered a plan Tuesday night making $1.3 million in alternative cuts and using most of that money to keep the police and fire department positions. The council voted unanimously to delay decisions on the budget until Monday.

Anderson Mayor Kevin Smith said he'll look at any suggestions, but that years of declining property tax revenue have left the city with few options.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Anderson
    Mayor Smith has stated that he is willing to look at other options and suggestions. And, Anderson is not dying. Mayor Smith is doing an excellent job at bringing in jobs. Get your facts straight before you post.
  • Anderson
    Why would a city that has high crime rate. No jobs. Basically has nothing to offer do this. Why not lay off lazy and non productive city employees. Why not lay off some wasted city job positions.? Cut pay in most positions esp. the Mayor. Anderson is ranked at the bottom. The city is dying and this is just gonna drive more citizens away decreasing the population even more. Anderson used to be a city of 70,000 now it's below 59,000. Bad move for Anderson if it lays off police and firefighters.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Looking at the two companies - in spite of their relative size to one another -- Ricker's image is (by all accounts) pretty solid and reputable. Their locations are clean, employees are friendly and the products they offer are reasonably priced. By contrast, BP locations are all over the place and their reputation is poor, especially when you consider this is the same "company" whose disastrous oil spill and their response was nothing short of irresponsible should tell you a lot. The fact you also have people who are experienced in franchising saying their system/strategy is flawed is a good indication that another "spill" has occurred and it's the AM-PM/Ricker's customers/company that are having to deal with it.

    2. Daniel Lilly - Glad to hear about your points and miles. Enjoy Wisconsin and Illinois. You don't care one whit about financial discipline, which is why you will blast the "GOP". Classic liberalism.

    3. Isn't the real reason the terrain? The planners under-estimated the undulating terrain, sink holes, karst features, etc. This portion of the route was flawed from the beginning.

    4. You thought no Indy was bad, how's no fans working out for you? THe IRl No direct competition and still no fans. Hey George Family, spend another billion dollars, that will fix it.

    5. I live downtown Indy and had to be in downtown Chicago for a meeting. In other words, I am the target demographic for this train. It leaves at 6:00-- early but doable. Then I saw it takes 5+ hours. No way. I drove. I'm sure I paid 3 to 5 times as much once you factor in gas, parking, and tolls, but it was reimbursed so not a factor for me. Any business traveler is going to take the option that gets there quickly and reliably... and leisure travelers are going to take the option that has a good schedule and promotional prices (i.e., Megabus). Indy to Chicago is the right distance (too short to fly but takes several hours to drive) that this train could be extremely successful even without subsidies, if they could figure out how to have several frequencies (at least 3x/day) and make the trip in a reasonable amount of time. For those who have never lived on the east coast-- Amtrak is the #1 choice for NY-DC and NY-Boston. They have the Acela service, it runs almost every hour, and it takes you from downtown to downtown. It beats driving and flying hands down. It is too bad that we cannot build something like this in the midwest, at least to connect the bigger cities.

    ADVERTISEMENT