A Hamilton County judge plans to order mediation in a series of disputes surrounding the estate of the late mall billionaire
Melvin Simon.
Superior Court Judge William J. Hughes on Tuesday told attorneys for widow Bren Simon, stepdaughter Deborah Simon and Simon
Property Group Inc. that he plans to enter an order for mediation on Friday.
The parties will have 15 days to either agree on a mediator or file a motion objecting to the order. Hughes encouraged the
attorneys to look nationwide if necessary to find the best possible mediator, without any conflicts.
Deborah Simon is challenging her father’s will in court, saying Melvin was coerced into approving a new estate plan
that dramatically increased the amount of his fortune going to Bren. She also wants her stepmother removed as trustee of the
estate—estimated to be worth $2 billion—while the broader case is pending.
Hughes has not yet ruled on the trustee issue, but on July 30 he banned distributions from the estate without
the court's approval.
Simon Property Group, meanwhile, joined the dispute to determine whether it must honor Bren Simon’s request to convert
$500 million of her late husband's ownership stake in the publicly traded company into common shares or cash.
On Tuesday, the judge said he expects all the parties—Bren, Deborah and representatives of the company, with the board’s
authority—and their attorneys to attend mediation talks.
Attorneys for both sides asked the judge to clarify whether the mediation order applied only to the question of whether Simon
Property must convert part of its co-founder’s ownership stake into common shares.
He shot back that it’s time to discuss “all of it, every bit of it … It’s clear we need to mediate
now.”
“You don’t have to resolve everything or agree to anything,” he said, but the parties need to sit across
the table from each other and try to work things out.
Hughes did not rule Tuesday on Bren Simon’s motion to dismiss the will contest, taking the matter under advisement.
The courtroom battle has provided a public glimpse into a long-simmering feud
among members of one of the city's wealthiest and most prominent families.

















First, the Athenaeum is going to have to get past the hurdle with the Lockerbie residents and the agreement that the parcel would be residential. Second, and in my opinion, this prime piece of property should include parking, PLUS, a black box theater(s), some market rate and affordable artist housing and a plan to renovate and reconfigure the second story theater. I would negotiate to add the DeHaan property surface parking lot into the development mix, place a one story surface parking garage on the DeHaan lot on the street level (for the Dehaan tenants use during the daytime) and add a second story to the garage that would become an addition to the current second story theater and then change the direction of the theater by moving the stage across the alley and on top of the DeHaan lot parking. You can add all the stage elements that are currently missing from the Athenaeum stage to make it more attractive for use by Ballet, Opera and traveling productions. Plus, the theater changes would probably help solve some of the soundproofing issues. Alas,it does not seem to be a part of the strategic plan to conduct a study to determine best use of the property. Seems like the current plan is a quick and easy move that ignores the property best use/potential and any strategic property planning for the effect on future generations.
I recall that MSA's pilings are still in the ground and hard to remove. It’s not likely any proposal will include significant underground construction/parking because of this. Start adding 2 floors of retail, 8 floors of parking and 5-10 floors of possible hotel, and/or 10-20 floors of residential, and you are at 30 floors already with possible expansion of all the uses. But then again I could be wrong.
Accoriding to their website there is no deadline to the Do Not Call list. What is this article referring to??
On what planet are they entitled to this largesse from the stockholders? These people make multi-million dollar salaries: Pay for your own personal travel.
It matters because they're already paid enormously fat salaries: Pay for your own personal travel. Being "taxed on it" isn't a valid excuse--so what? They're still being gifted a raft of luxury perks from somebody else's money on top of an enormous, lavish salary.